they're clearly not the only ones lacking in expertise or understanding
and you are entirely missing the point of his post.
nospam wrote:
they're clearly not the only ones lacking in expertise or understanding
and you are entirely missing the point of his post.
It's Apple who can't even _design_ something as small as a modem, nospam.
And it's Apple who can't even _integrate_ a modem they bought outright.
It's Apple who lacks the expertise in design. But Apple makes up for
that lack of design expertise with stellar MARKETING!
And you iKooks fall for every obvious marketing trick in the book, nospam.
Both nospam and Alan Baker are iKooks who suffer from the same issues:
a. Their ego is somehow (strangely so) intertwined with Apple marketing BS
b. And both lack the IQ necessary to separate fact from fiction
c. Worse, both have no education (certainly none in marketing gimmicks)
Apple _trademarks_ anything they can as a mere marketing gimmick.
That way they can "sell" that gimmick to ignorant fools like nospam & AB.
The fact remains almost everyone buys Qualcomm modems, so woo hoo there. Almost everyone buys any one given level of ARM technology too, so woo hoo. And almost everyone has TSMC fab those Qualcomm/ARM technologies. Woo hoo.
The only woo hoo in all of Alan Bakers diatribe was he's absolutely
enamored
that Apple bothered to trademark what nobody else bothered to trademark.
Wow. Apple can make "*TSMC Silicon!*" using Qualcomm & ARM technology.
Only a completely brain-dead troll would try to claim that Apple's chips
are not Apple.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2022-03-28 12:13 p.m., sms wrote:
On 3/28/2022 10:13 AM, someone wrote:
The chip is fabricated by TSMC:
Please do not respond in c.m.a and only respond if you must to comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.system because this thread
has nothing to do with Android.
Put anyone who still responds to c.m.a into your kill file please.
They are too smart to join the troll.
Alan Browne wrote:
They are too smart to join the troll.
Marketing's job is to influence buyer behavior psychology.
Apple is great at that (no... brilliant at that).
Apple likely spends ten times more in MARKETING than in R&D as a result.
The whole "*TSMC Silicon*" marketing proves how great Apple is at that.
Woo hoo. So Apple pays TSMC to make their chips. So does everyone else.
You need a dumb uneducated customer base to _believe_ those silly gimmicks. Nobody on the _adult_ OS newsgroups falls for Microsoft or Intel gimmicks.
Only Apple iKooks fall for every obvious Marketing gimmick in the book.
But even so, what do Apple marketing gimmicks have to do with Android?
On 2022-03-29 2:36 p.m., Andy Burnelli wrote:
...
If you're going to start calling it "TSMC Silicon" because they
manufacture it, there's a lot more you're going to have to rename
In article <t20anf$reo$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2022-03-29 2:36 p.m., Andy Burnelli wrote:
...
If you're going to start calling it "TSMC Silicon" because they
manufacture it, there's a lot more you're going to have to rename
including intel, who plans to use tsmc to fab some of intel's own chips.
If you're going to start calling it "TSMC Silicon" because they
manufacture it, there's a lot more you're going to have to rename
including intel, who plans to use tsmc to fab some of intel's own chips.
And then there are Qualcomm, Nvidia...
...and lots of other who have no fabs either.
According to our Arlen, every Qualcomm chip--every Nvidia chip...
...is actually "TSMC Silicon"?
In article <t20cet$6dn$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
If you're going to start calling it "TSMC Silicon" because they
manufacture it, there's a lot more you're going to have to rename
including intel, who plans to use tsmc to fab some of intel's own chips.
And then there are Qualcomm, Nvidia...
yep, but intel is surprising given that they have their own fabs.
unfortunately, intel is well behind the curve, thus the need to sub it
out to tsmc.
...and lots of other who have no fabs either.
According to our Arlen, every Qualcomm chip--every Nvidia chip...
...is actually "TSMC Silicon"?
he has absolutely no idea about pretty much everything.
On 2022-03-29 2:36 p.m., Andy Burnelli wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:
They are too smart to join the troll.
Marketing's job is to influence buyer behavior psychology.
Apple is great at that (no... brilliant at that).
Apple likely spends ten times more in MARKETING than in R&D as a result.So suddenly it's "likely"... ...and not a fact?
The whole "*TSMC Silicon*" marketing proves how great Apple is at that.Nope.
If you're going to start calling it "TSMC Silicon" because they
manufacture it, there's a lot more you're going to have to rename
Woo hoo. So Apple pays TSMC to make their chips. So does everyone else.Manufacturing is not designing.
You need a dumb uneducated customer base to _believe_ those silly gimmicks. Nobody on the _adult_ OS newsgroups falls for Microsoft or Intel gimmicks.
Only Apple iKooks fall for every obvious Marketing gimmick in the book.
But even so, what do Apple marketing gimmicks have to do with Android?
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 9:11:13 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2022-03-29 2:36 p.m., Andy Burnelli wrote:
Alan Browne wrote:So suddenly it's "likely"... ...and not a fact?
They are too smart to join the troll.
Marketing's job is to influence buyer behavior psychology.
Apple is great at that (no... brilliant at that).
Apple likely spends ten times more in MARKETING than in R&D as a result.
Nope.
The whole "*TSMC Silicon*" marketing proves how great Apple is at that.
If you're going to start calling it "TSMC Silicon" because they
manufacture it, there's a lot more you're going to have to rename
Woo hoo. So Apple pays TSMC to make their chips. So does everyone else.Manufacturing is not designing.
You need a dumb uneducated customer base to _believe_ those silly gimmicks. >>> Nobody on the _adult_ OS newsgroups falls for Microsoft or Intel gimmicks. >>>
Only Apple iKooks fall for every obvious Marketing gimmick in the book.
But even so, what do Apple marketing gimmicks have to do with Android?
And designing is not manufacturing.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 163:03:20 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,509 |