• Re: iOS 15 support

    From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Your Name on Fri Aug 5 01:14:53 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Your Name wrote:

    The usual anti-Apple troll bollocks. Try updating an old mobile device
    to the latest Android ... can't be done.

    The fact remains a fact that Apple kills operating systems sooner than
    any other maker of common consumer operating systems...

    Such that... *Apple products just die on you.*

    You _hate_ the fact Apple products have the shortest support lifecycle.
    But the fact you hate that fact doesn't change the fact it's a fact.

    Try updating an old computer
    to the latest Windows ... can't be done.

    My desktop is from 2008 and, as such, it has had _many_ versions of Windows
    on it since then, and currently it runs Windows 10 just fine.

    By way of stark contrast, due to the stone-age iOS monolithic design and
    Apple marketing strategy of killing off its old products, try to run a
    modern iOS on an Apple device from that same time frame.

    Note the _adult_ observation: It can't be done.
    Why not?

    Because Apple kills off their operating systems sooner than anyone else.

    Every OS developer on Earth eventually drops support for old devices,
    no matter how many people are still using them.

    My desktop was built in 2008 and it runs the key Windows 10 apps just fine.

    My point is clearly that you iKooks don't realize this fundamental fact:
    *Apple kills off their operating systems sooner than anyone else.*
    --
    I realize iKooks not only hate me, but they fear me, because they have no
    adult defense to the facts that I present to them (which they hate).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Fri Aug 5 13:26:59 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2022-08-05 13:23, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Wade Garrett wrote:

    Gave up on Android phones several years back after several of the
    fairly recent model nice ones I had couldn't be OS updated.

    What these low IQ uneducated iKooks don't comprehend is the _adult_ concept of a layered update mechanism, which the primitive iOS monolith lacks.

    Hence every other operating system supports devices far longer than iOS.

    For example, the Android default browser run on almost every Android.
    So does the Android default messenger.
    As does the Android default dialer.
    etc.

    And system updates are now down for all Android phones over the Internet. Note the carrier is no longer involved (even for firmware updates!)

    As such, Android is updated essentially forever (there is no EOL date).
    By way of contrast with the stone-age laughably primitive iOS monolith...
      *iOS... it just dies*

    Oh, look!

    Statements of purported "fact" without any supporting citations!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Wade Garrett on Fri Aug 5 21:23:46 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Wade Garrett wrote:

    Gave up on Android phones several years back after several of the fairly recent model nice ones I had couldn't be OS updated.

    What these low IQ uneducated iKooks don't comprehend is the _adult_ concept
    of a layered update mechanism, which the primitive iOS monolith lacks.

    Hence every other operating system supports devices far longer than iOS.

    For example, the Android default browser run on almost every Android.
    So does the Android default messenger.
    As does the Android default dialer.
    etc.

    And system updates are now down for all Android phones over the Internet.
    Note the carrier is no longer involved (even for firmware updates!)

    As such, Android is updated essentially forever (there is no EOL date).
    By way of contrast with the stone-age laughably primitive iOS monolith...

    *iOS... it just dies*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Fri Aug 5 21:27:50 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Jolly Roger wrote:

    The resident Apple-hating troll...

    What is consistent about iKooks is they fear facts more than anything else.

    What's clear is that Jolly Roger is _completely clueless_ how Android (and
    all modern operating systems) are updated... in layers... essentially
    forever.

    Which is why the default Android browser works on almost all Android
    phones, as does the default Android messenger, as does the default Android YouTube app, as does the default Android map app, as does the default
    Android phone dialer, as do _all_ the default Android apps.

    Unlike iOS...

    These low IQ completely uneducated iKooks only know what Apple feeds them. They're completely unaware almost all of Android is updated over the web.

    Heck... they're clueless that even the firmware is now updated that way.

    As such, Android is updated essentially forever (there is no EOL date).
    By way of contrast with the stone-age laughably primitive iOS monolith...

    *iOS... it just dies*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Fri Aug 5 21:35:25 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    nospam wrote:

    the 6s is 7 years old. that's a long time to keep a phone.

    The fact remains that Android is layered, as are almost all modern
    operating systems... except iOS (which is a stone-age monolith).

    Over two dozen of the core modules are now updated over the Internet.
    Even the firmware is now being updated over the Internet for Android.

    The carrier isn't even involved anymore.

    A simple working example that even the low-IQ uneducated iKooks can
    comprehend (let's hope) is that the default web browser for iOS is Safari
    while the default web browser for Android is Chrome, which is continually
    and almost ceaselessly updated on almost all Android phones extant.

    Likewise (and even more so) for the default messenger, the default dialer,
    the default video player, the default map app, the default search app, the default app store app, the default calendar app, the default file browser,
    etc.

    By way of stark contrast, even the ill-educated low-IQ iKooks know that is definitely not even close to the case for the default iOS Apple apps.

    Android: It's updated essentially forever now.
    iOS: *It still just dies*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to spam@nospam.com on Fri Aug 5 16:35:03 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    In article <tcjufb$7e7$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    As such, Android is updated essentially forever (there is no EOL date).

    as such, you are lying again.

    <https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/08/google-will-kill-off-very-old-v ersions-of-android-next-month/>
    Starting September 27, devices running Android 2.3.7 and lower
    will no longer be able to log in to Google services, effectively
    killing a big portion of the on-rails Android experience.
    ...
    This isn't the first time Google has killed off older versions of
    Android because of higher login security. The Android 1.0-era
    apps have been broken for years

    <https://www.gsmarena.com/google_will_stop_updating_play_services_for_de vices_running_android_jelly_bean-news-49967.php>
    Google will soon stop updating Play Services for phones running
    Android Jelly Bean ­ this covers all three versions, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3
    (API version 16 through 18, respectively).

    there's more, but that's sufficient to prove you wrong yet again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Fri Aug 5 21:43:37 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    nospam wrote:

    As such, Android is updated essentially forever (there is no EOL date).

    as such, you are lying again.

    Facts... are what iKooks are afraid of... since *iOS just dies*

    What is interesting about you, nospam, is not that you have a low IQ nor
    that you were never educated, nor even that you defend all of Apple's flaws
    to the death... as all you iKooks own the confluence of those three traits.

    No. What is interesting about you, nospam, is that you are the _smartest_
    of the iKooks, in that you didn't try to defend Apple's flaws (in this case anyway) by claiming all facts you _hate_ about Apple products are wrong.

    Instead, you simply said all facts you hate about Apple products are lies.

    Since you're the smartest of the low-IQ uneducated iKooks nospam, let's
    take the _simplest_ possible case of default apps, shall we?
    a. iOS === Safari
    b. Android === Chrome

    As you may be well aware, Chrome is updated at least way back to icecream sandwhich (as I recall - but we can look up the exact date).

    Simple question of fact:
    *How many years ago was it that icecream sandwhich was released?*

    Now, let's take the case of the default iOS browser, shall we?
    *What is the oldest iOS version the latest version of Safari supports?*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Fri Aug 5 21:20:16 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2022-08-05, Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
    On 2022-08-05, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2022-08-05, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2022-08-04 17:14, Andy Burnelli wrote:

    Notice how Andy (Arlen) snips pertinent quoted text from his replies
    (which I have graciously restored below) because his unhealthy obsession
    and hatred of Apple forces him to refuse to acknowledge factual
    discourse here. Just lame!

    My desktop was built in 2008 and it runs the key Windows 10 apps
    just fine.

    My point is clearly that you iKooks don't realize this fundamental
    fact: *Apple kills off their operating systems sooner than anyone
    else.*

    Computers and smartphones are different devices, and computers
    haven't changed nearly as much since 2008 as smartphones have.

    iOS 15 supports iPhones back to the iPhone 6s...

    ...which was released nearly 7 years ago.

    What is the oldest Android phone supported by the most current
    version of Android, hmmm?

    One example: The HTC Dream was released in 2008 as the first device
    to use the Android operating system, and can't run anything past
    Android *1.6* (Donut): <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream> For
    those keeping track, the current Android release is Android *12*
    which was released on October 4, 2021.

    The resident Apple-hating troll, Andy (Arlen), reeeeally wants you
    to ignore this FACT. ; )

    What is consistent about iKooks is they fear facts more than anything
    else.

    What's clear is that Jolly Roger is _completely clueless_ how Android
    (and all modern operating systems) are updated... in layers...
    essentially forever.

    What is clear is that no matter how many words Arlen throws at the wall,
    he can't change the FACT that many Android smartphones CANNOT AND WILL
    NEVER run the latest version of Android, which is why he tries to move
    the goal post below to talk abut apps instead of the operating system.
    He'll do *anything* to avoid acknowledging FACTS that disagree with his
    LIES. He's a pathetic and useless troll who spends his every waking
    moment trolling the Apple news groups due to his irrational and
    obsessive hatred of all things Apple. He serves no actual useful purpose
    on this planet. He lives a life of pure hatred and anger. He's a piece
    of shit human being who is a net negative to society. He's a pathetic
    fucking turd. : )

    Which is why the default Android browser works on almost all Android
    phones, as does the default Android messenger, as does the default
    Android YouTube app, as does the default Android map app, as does the
    default Android phone dialer, as do _all_ the default Android apps.

    BLAH BLAH BLAH... Just *desperately* trying to move the goal posts.
    *Anything* but acknowledging the FACT that many Android devices CANNOT and
    WILL NEVER run the latest Android OS. : )

    Unlike iOS...

    These low IQ completely uneducated iKooks only know what Apple feeds
    them. They're completely unaware almost all of Android is updated
    over the web.

    Heck... they're clueless that even the firmware is now updated that
    way.

    As such, Android is updated essentially forever (there is no EOL
    date). By way of contrast with the stone-age laughably primitive iOS monolith...

    *iOS... it just dies*

    LIES are all poor, little Arlen has. He DESPERATELY wants you to ignore
    the FACT that iOS devices DO NOT "just die" after Apple stops supporting
    them with major OS upgrades, and many of them remain useful for YEARS afterward. ; )

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to spam@nospam.com on Fri Aug 5 17:40:48 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    In article <tcjvct$jnh$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    Facts... are what I do not have and never have had.

    ftfy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Fri Aug 5 18:20:20 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 8/4/2022 5:14 PM, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Your Name wrote:

    The usual anti-Apple troll bollocks. Try updating an old mobile device
    to the latest Android ... can't be done.

    The fact remains a fact that Apple kills operating systems sooner than
    any other maker of common consumer operating systems...
    Such that... *Apple products just die on you.*

    You _hate_ the fact Apple products have the shortest support lifecycle.
    But the fact you hate that fact doesn't change the fact it's a fact.

    Try updating an old computer to the latest Windows ... can't be done.

    My desktop is from 2008 and, as such, it has had _many_ versions of Windows on it since then, and currently it runs Windows 10 just fine.

    By way of stark contrast, due to the stone-age iOS monolithic design and Apple marketing strategy of killing off its old products, try to run a
    modern iOS on an Apple device from that same time frame.

    Note the _adult_ observation: It can't be done.
    Why not?

    Because Apple kills off their operating systems sooner than anyone else.

    Every OS developer on Earth eventually drops support for old devices,
    no matter how many people are still using them.

    My desktop was built in 2008 and it runs the key Windows 10 apps just fine.

    My point is clearly that you iKooks don't realize this fundamental fact: *Apple kills off their operating systems sooner than anyone else.*




    Yet Win 11 is not made for PCs older than about three years old. Won't
    even let you install unless you apply a hack.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to John on Sat Aug 6 04:57:09 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    John wrote:

    Yet Win 11 is not made for PCs older than about three years old. Won't
    even let you install unless you apply a hack.

    I never disagree with facts.
    Only fools disagree with facts.
    That's _why_ they're fools, in fact.

    Agree that Windows 11 has very specific hardware requirements which negates
    its installation on quite a few not even that old desktop & laptop systems.

    Also agree Microsoft finally pulled the anti-privacy trick Apple has been
    using for years of _requiring_ a mothership tracking account on Win11 Home.

    Also agree that Windows 11 is essentially Windows 10 dressed up in costume, which is good because we can allow the corporate world who has the big
    bucks to expend their resources to upgrade their systems to Win11 specs.

    Meanwhile, a PC from circa 2005 runs Windows 10 just fine, as does mine.
    It's only Apple platforms where the operating systems "*just die*" on you.

    By way of example, Android is now updated essentially forever.
    And, most of Android is updated completely outside the carrier nowadays.
    Even Qualcomm firmware is now updated using the Google Play Store nowadays.

    Maybe you can find a common operating system that dies sooner than iOS. Otherwise, iOS is the worst in terms of the operating system dying on us.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Sat Aug 6 05:32:18 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    nospam wrote:

    ftfy

    The _adults_ on this newsgroup will note that when I brought up the clear
    and obvious evidence that *iOS dies sooner than other operating systems*,
    the _only_ response nospam could come up with is this childish taunt.

    Yet the fact remains a fact that iOS dies sooner than all other systems.

    Why?
    Because it's a primitive monolith, that's why.

    On all other operating systems, the _layers_ are updated independently of
    the operating system; but not on the stone-age iOS operating system.

    So *iOS just dies*.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Your Name on Sat Aug 6 05:44:31 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Your Name wrote:

    Then of course there's the fact that MacOS upgrades are free, while you
    have to pay to be a Windoze fool.

    I never disagree with facts as only fools disagree with facts.
    Where do you get the idea that Windows upgrades costs additional money?

    I bought a desktop in circa 2008, and it had whatever Microsoft operating system at the time (pro version) and then it has been upgraded so many
    times I can't count the number of times it has been updated.

    All for free.

    Again, I never disagree with facts so I am wondering where you get your
    facts from if you think that I paid for those upgrades, when I didn't.

    I even updated some of the hardware and Windows _still_ recognized it as
    the same computer. And I've wiped out and reformatted the hard drives many times (as a bunch failed over the years since 2008).

    If you're claiming that I paid for all those upgrades, then why don't I
    know this "fact" you seem to be aware of that nobody else knows about.

    If my circa 2008 desktop could support Windows 11, even _that_ would be
    free (although Microsoft pulled the sleazy trick following Apple's lead of requiring a mothership tracking account, so I'm perfectly happy to NOT
    install Windows 11 since all the apps work just fine anyway as the
    operating system is the sum total of everything you need to do what you
    need to do).

    In summary, I have been using the _same_ Windows license since circa 2008.
    Yet you claim that's not what is happening.

    Please explain your reasoning.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sat Aug 6 05:22:31 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Jolly Roger wrote:

    snips pertinent quoted text from his replies

    FACTs are things that low-IQ uneducated people like jR can't process.

    FACT #1:
    It's common Internet courtesy to snip (anyone who wants to can go back and
    see _exactly_ what's posted unless people purposefully put X-no-archive
    in their headers, which I do not do because it's common courtesy not to.

    FACT #2:
    I snip _every_ response, and have been doing so for decades on Usenet.
    For Jolly Roger to complain now is proof he doesn't comprehend basic facts.

    and hatred of Apple forces him to refuse to acknowledge factual
    discourse here. Just lame!

    FACT #3:
    It's common knowledge I own Linux, Windows, iOS, and Android products, and,
    as such, it's common knowledge I post on all the common operating system newsgroups. It's not just Apple newsgroups that I post facts to.

    FACT #4:
    It's common knowledge I post facts about Linux (e.g., canonical trying to
    get us to buy their crappy desktop), about Windows (e.g., Microsoft trying
    to take away our privacy by requiring a mothership tracking account), about Android (e.g., Google removing login/password from their mail servers, etc.

    FACT #5:
    Nobody on the adult operating system newsgroups complains about these
    facts. It's ONLY on the child-like Apple newsgroups where facts are hated.

    What is clear is that no matter how many words Arlen throws at the wall,
    he can't change the FACT that many Android smartphones CANNOT AND WILL
    NEVER run the latest version of Android

    FACT #6:
    Windows 10 runs essentially everything Windows 11 does, as does Windows 7,
    8, and Vista, which goes back something like almost two decades in time.

    There is nothing special about the operating system version on _all_
    platforms other than the primitive monolithic laughably archaic iOS.

    What matters are the applications you can run, where, in the case of
    Android, all the default applications work just fine on almost every
    Android phone out there today, whether that's the default browser, the
    default mail user agent, the default youtube client, the default map
    client, the default messenger, the default contacts app, the default
    gallery app, the default camera, the default dialer, etc.

    On iOS... *everything just dies*

    which is why he tries to move
    the goal post below to talk abut apps instead of the operating system.

    The apps in iOS _are_ the operating system.

    The fact that Jolly Roger is completely clueless that iOS is _different_
    from all modern operating systems is yet another indication of his low IQ.

    He'll do *anything* to avoid acknowledging FACTS that disagree with his
    LIES.

    And yet, the fact is Android is updated essentially forever nowadays.
    *iOS just dies*

    He's a pathetic and useless troll who spends his every waking
    moment trolling the Apple news groups due to his irrational and
    obsessive hatred of all things Apple.

    I probably own more Apple products than does Jolly Roger, so I find it indicative of all iKooks that anyone who speaks facts about Apple producdts
    is a danger to them.

    I get it that Jolly Roger is afraid of facts.
    I get it that Jolly Roger is therefore afraid of me.

    But the fact JR hates facts doesn't change the fact they're still facts.

    He serves no actual useful purpose
    on this planet. He lives a life of pure hatred and anger.

    And yet it's you, Jolly Roger (and Lewis too) who spew your fifth-grade
    vitriol every tome someone speaks a fact about Apple that you hate.

    And note, that's a _lot_ of facts you hate, Jolly Roger.

    He's a piece
    of shit human being who is a net negative to society. He's a pathetic
    fucking turd. : )

    It's interesting that you can't discuss the facts like an adult, JR.
    You act like a fifth grade bully told that Santa Claus isn't real, JR.

    The fact that's how you respond to facts shows how _desperate_ you are.
    You actually _hate_ it's a fact iOS dies sooner than all other systems.

    Otherwise you wouldn't respond to that fact like a fifth grade held-back
    bully does when he's told by other fifth graders that Santa Claus is a marketing gimmick, Jolly Roger.

    Otherwise, you'd act like an adult when faced with the facts, JR.

    Here's a fact for you to discuss, for example, as an adult, JR:
    *Find any common consumer operating system that dies _sooner_ than iOS*
    *Find just one*

    HINT: You can't.

    BLAH BLAH BLAH... Just *desperately* trying to move the goal posts.

    The goal posts are that iOS dies sooner than all other operating systems.

    *Anything* but acknowledging the FACT that many Android devices CANNOT and WILL NEVER run the latest Android OS. : )

    Android is now updated essentially forever.
    You _hate_ that fact.

    But the fact you hate that fact doesn't change the fact that's a fact.

    LIES are all poor, little Arlen has. He DESPERATELY wants you to ignore
    the FACT that iOS devices DO NOT "just die" after Apple stops supporting
    them with major OS upgrades, and many of them remain useful for YEARS afterward. ; )

    If they truly are lies, then you should be able to act like an adult and
    tell us which operating system dies _sooner_ than does iOS Jolly Roger.

    Name just one.
    --
    HINT: An operating system is _everything_ you need, which includes the key apps, the core services, the kernel, the graphical user interface, etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Sat Aug 6 05:37:09 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    nospam wrote:

    Doesn't that make him a genius?

    it does not.

    If the only way you can respond to all facts you hate is to act like a
    child, then that clearly and obviously shows you for what you are, nospam.

    Remember... I'm on this newsgroup for _two_ reasons:

    1. To learn from others and teach others about Apple products, and,
    2. To show the world (for the permanent record) what you iKooks are.

    In this case, you're so frightened by facts, you respond as a child.
    Let's see if you can bring yourself to the adult level, shall we nospam?

    *Name one common operating system that dies _sooner_ than does iOS.
    *Name just one*

    HINT: You can't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Your Name on Sat Aug 6 06:02:30 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Your Name wrote:

    These days all operating systems are simply adding more and more useless/niche gimmickry that 99% of users don't ever use. They should
    instead be concentrting on fixing all the bugs (many that have existed
    for years) and making the OS more efficient. Anyone who actually wants
    any of the gimmickry can add it as an App Store extra.

    It's interesting that Your Name is telling it like it is, which is that
    most common consumer operating systems are "mature" by now.

    Hence, Android is mature; iOS is mature; Windows is mature; and Linux is
    mature such that each successive "version" is no different than the last.

    What matters are the applications that you can run on the operating system, where we add a long thread on the Windows newsgroups each time Microsoft "claims" a new operating system asking:
    What can you do on Window "X" that you can't do on Windows "X-1"

    Here's just one example:
    *Is there any useful new Win11 functionality that isn't already in Win10?*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows/c/NCuZDp9k_nU/m/PnVEsFwsBgAJ>

    Note that in many cases, the operating systems get _worse_ over time.
    For example:
    *How is Microsoft planning on making money from the future forced mothership login requirement?*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows/c/Nb5_b7aM-dI/m/FWFeeOAFAgAJ>

    Note that Microsoft is following the sleazy lead that Apple did already:
    *If Apple can permanently lock your hardware for not logging into it - why can't Microsoft do it too?*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.microsoft.windows/c/IbpQSemnfmo/m/QFCmy0G5AQAJ>

    Never forget iOS is _different_ from all common consumer operating system
    in that iOS is a primitive monolithic stone-age all-or-nothing design.

    So for iOS, the actual version number _does_ matter.
    A lot.

    But the version is meaningless for other common consumer operating systems.
    You can install Chrome, for example, or Edge, or whatever default app you
    want to on my Windows 10 which is on a desktop from circa 2008.

    Likewise with almost all Android phones.
    It's only iOS that "*just dies*" on you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 6 05:49:18 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    *Hemidactylus* wrote:

    Why do you hate the fact that only Apple products kill off the operating
    system sooner than any other common consumer operating system out there?

    I hate the fact that worthless trolls like you kill off informative discussion and ruin threads sooner than any other loser basement dweller
    with internet access. You˘ve effectively destroyed this newsgroup. Proud of yourself for that?

    The permanent record clearly shows that the instant a fact is provided on
    the child-like Apple newsgroups, the iKooks instantly devolve to their kindergarten responses.

    The fact remains a fact that iOS is _different_ than all other common
    consumer operating systems, where the primitive monolithic iOS is NOT
    updated in layers - but as a stone-age monolithic design.

    Hence, for example, Chrome is updated on my Windows 10 desktop which
    started its life as whatever Windows was around in 2008, and that Windows
    has successively been updated for free over the years on my desktop.

    And Chrome still is updated on it.

    Likewise, Android is designed in layers where those layers are now updated
    over the Internet completely outside the carriers and the manufacturers.

    Having said that, I do realize low-IQ uneducated people like Hemidactylus
    do NOT understand that Android and Windows are updated in layers.

    Hence I dumb down the message to ask them a simple adult question...
    *Name a modern operating system that dies _sooner_ than does iOS*
    *Name just one*

    Hint: You can't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Sat Aug 6 06:04:30 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    nospam wrote:

    like sour milk, phones should have an odor so you know it needs to be discarded.

    Luckily for you nospam, iOS essentially does that as the stone-age monolith "*just dies*" (unlike all other common consumer operating systems which are layered and where those layers are updated essentially forever nowadays).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Sat Aug 6 05:55:28 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2022-08-06, Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote:

    What is clear is that no matter how many words Arlen throws at the
    wall, he can't change the FACT that many Android smartphones CANNOT
    AND WILL NEVER run the latest version of Android

    FACT #6: Windows 10 blah blah blah...

    Note how Arlen *desperately* tries to move the goalpost to desktop
    operating systems when confronted with the FACT that many Android
    smartphones CANNOT AND WILL NEVER run the latest version of Android.
    He's a pathetic and useless troll.

    On iOS... *everything just dies*

    LIES are all poor, little Arlen has. He DESPERATELY wants you to
    ignore the FACT that iOS devices DO NOT "just die" after Apple stops
    supporting them with major OS upgrades, and many of them remain
    useful for YEARS afterward. ; )

    Pathetic troll. : )

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sat Aug 6 07:59:15 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Jolly Roger wrote:

    Note how Arlen *desperately* tries to move the goalpost to desktop
    operating systems when confronted with the FACT that many Android
    smartphones CANNOT AND WILL NEVER run the latest version of Android.


    You still don't get it Jolly Roger... because you don't own any intellect.
    *It's not about the silly operating system version number... you fool*

    Apple has you trained like a subservient dog, Jolly Roger.
    You are salivating over something as silly as a meaningless version number.

    You actually don't care that iOS dies sooner than all other operating
    systems because all you seem to care about is the silly version number.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to spam@nospam.com on Sat Aug 6 07:20:49 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    In article <tckr4p$tdr$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:


    Remember... I'm on this newsgroup for _two_ reasons:

    trolling and lying.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Sat Aug 6 17:09:29 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    nospam wrote:

    Remember... I'm on this newsgroup for _two_ reasons:

    trolling and lying.

    You iKooks can't form an _adult_ response to facts about Apple products.

    The facts are:
    a. iOS is a monolith while _all_ other common consumer OS's are layered
    b. The primitive iOS monolith contains _all_ the layers in one release
    c. All modern operating systems break the release into their layers

    With iOS, it's all or nothing - and - worse - iOS dies soonest of all.

    HINT: My circa 2008 desktop is _still_ running a free update of the
    original Windows that it came with an decade and a half ago.

    HINT: Android is layered into scores upon scores of layers, each of
    which is independently released to the users over the Internet.

    HINT: *iOS just dies*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to spam@nospam.com on Sat Aug 6 11:53:18 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    In article <tcm27b$uno$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:


    *The result is there is no operating system with a _shorter life_ - than iOS.*

    windows phone says hello.

    microsoft kin says howzit.

    beos says bonjour.

    palm os says aloha.

    amiga os says hola.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Sat Aug 6 16:44:07 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    nospam wrote:

    The apps in iOS _are_ the operating system.

    nope. that is very much false, and is not unique to ios either.

    go learn about what an operating system and apps actually are before
    you dig yourself an even deeper hole.

    Facts

    What's _different_ about iOS, nospam, is it's built as an ancient monolith. *The result is there is no operating system with a _shorter life_ - than iOS.*

    When operating systems evolved, they learned to release in layers.
    a. As such, Windows is updated essentially forever (my Win10 PC is 2008).
    b. As is Linux (that same circa Win10 PC runs almost every linux around).
    c. My Android is also layered such that its updated essentially forever.
    Dozens of core operating system layers are updated over the Internet
    Even the firmware layers are now being updated over the Internet
    Certainly the key default apps are constantly updated over the Internet
    etc.

    That's not possible with the primitive stone-age monolithic iOS design.

    You low-IQ uneducated iKooks have no idea operating systems are layered.
    *As a result no common operating system has a _shorter life_ - than iOS.*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Sat Aug 6 18:13:57 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    nospam wrote:

    Meanwhile, a PC from circa 2005 runs Windows 10 just fine,

    no it doesn't

    FACTS

    I just snapped this screenshot for you nospam, where the PC I was
    sitting at (which isn't my oldest PC running Windows 10) is from 2009.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/3x3pZBfP/version01.jpg> Windows & Android updates

    Why is it that you iKooks must resort to denying facts, like flat earth proponents, just to maintain intact your completely imaginary beliefs?

    Why must iKooks declare all facts are wrong - just because they hate facts?

    Your beloved iOS operating system *just dies* on you so you "think" all operating systems are built as a laughably primitive stone-age monolith.

    My desktop is almost fifteen years old, nospam, and it was born with a
    Windows version which has been constantly updated, for free, ever since.

    Just like my modern Android phone, Windows updates in asynchronous layers.
    But due to the primitive iOS archaic monolith - *iOS just dies* on users.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Sat Aug 6 18:33:32 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    nospam wrote:

    *The result is there is no operating system with a _shorter life_ - than iOS.*

    windows phone says hello.

    microsoft kin says howzit.

    beos says bonjour.

    palm os says aloha.

    amiga os says hola.

    Note the best comparison you can find to iOS, are dead operating systems.

    I never disagree with facts nospam, and I appreciate that your facts proved
    my point in that I said all _common_ consumer operating systems many times.

    What you found out were facts that _many_ nascent operating systems died.
    And that's true. (Only a fool would dispute facts.)
    (That's why they're fools.)

    What you need to understand is I'm talking about _common_ consumer
    operating systems, such as Linux, Android, & Windows compared to iOS.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/W39XTWWZ/version01.jpg> Windows & Android updates

    Those common consumer operating systems essentially are updated almost
    forever which, in the case of Windows, for me, is my 2009 desktop is
    still running Windows 10 with the constant free upgrades from Microsoft.

    In addition, _all_ the apps run just fine as they are updated
    asynchronously, which is important because with iOS - it all just dies.

    Note the best comparison you can find to iOS, are dead operating systems.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Sun Aug 7 08:31:07 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    very few features appear on android first. the vast majority of
    features appear on ios first and later on android, if ever.

    How long did it take for iOS to include even a rudimentary app drawer?
    What about default app selection nospam?
    And, um, er., when is IOS gonna get the ability to change the launcher?

    The list is almost endless what Android has and what iOS can't do,
    but the list of what Android did first and iOS could barely catch up is shorter.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to sms on Sun Aug 7 08:24:29 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    sms wrote:

    On my older flagship Android devices there are no upgrades to the latest Android version, but they are still receiving security updates. My Note
    9 shipped with Android 8 and received two updates and is now at Android
    10, and won't get Android 11 or future new Android versions. But it gets security updates, the most recent one was pushed out in June 2022, so
    the device is still supported.

    What most people, including Steve, on this newsgroup don't seem to
    comprehend is that a phone includes lots more than simply a meaningless
    version number.

    For example, a phone contains default apps, such as the default web
    browser, the default messenger app, the default mail user agent, the
    default navigation app, the default calendar app, the default file manager
    app, etc., all of which are updated on Android well after the meaningless operating system version has expired.

    In addition, a phone contains layers of core functionalities and services, again which are updated nowadays (after about Android 10) essentially
    forever, where those updates are completely independent of the carrier and
    the manufacturer of the phone.

    In addition to those critical operating system components outside the meaningless version number, there are the security patches, which do
    require (most of the time) the manufacturer to be involved.

    Lastly, and definitely the least important, is the almost meaningless
    Android version, which, let's be clear, provides almost zero value to the
    user since almost everything (but not always everything!) that any one
    version adds, the older versions can back port.

    Having said that, _none_ of this is possible on iOS, so Steve is correct in saying that comparing the operating system update mechanism between Android
    and iOS requires a knowledge level that I don't think many people here
    have.

    Certainly not the iKooks, and it seems, from what Steve wrote, not him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sun Aug 7 08:28:34 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jolly Roger wrote:

    The only people comparing them are you and your troll buddies. The rest
    of us couldn't care less because we don't have unhealthy obsessions and irrational hatred of other operating systems or platform.

    Actually you do care, Jolly Roger.
    You care a lot.

    You _hate_ that iOS uses a laughably primitive archaic update mechanism.

    With every common consumer OS other than iOS, when the almost meaningless operating system version number expires, nothing changes becuase the
    devices maintains almost full functionality in terms of updates.

    yet...

    on iOS...

    Unfortunately for you, Jolly Roger...

    On iOS... Everything *just dies*.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Wade Garrett on Sun Aug 7 08:16:46 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    Wade Garrett wrote:

    Andie-boy, you remind me of a guy who hates his hometown team but can't
    stay away from the ballpark where he regularly shows up to boo them and
    yell invectives...

    Hi Wade,

    Why can't you respond to the _facts_ instead of playing childish games?

    The facts are that only Apple operating systems die on you such that you
    can no longer update the default apps to the latest version on iOS.

    That's just a fact.
    It's a fact you _hate_ perhaps.

    But the fact you hate that fact doesn't change the fact that fact is a fact.

    *No other common consumer operating system _just dies_ like iOS does*
    The adult question is why.

    Are you an adult Wade?
    Or a child?

    Do you have an adult point of view Wade?
    Or only that of a child?

    Given you the benefit of the doubt, here's an adult question for you Wade:
    *Why can't an older iOS update the default apps to the latest version*
    *like all other common consumer operating systems habitually do?*
    --
    Please answer this adult question... like an adult would.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to spam@nospam.com on Sun Aug 7 05:57:32 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    In article <tcnpn0$gfi$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:


    very few features appear on android first. the vast majority of
    features appear on ios first and later on android, if ever.

    How long did it take for iOS to include even a rudimentary app drawer?
    What about default app selection nospam?
    And, um, er., when is IOS gonna get the ability to change the launcher?

    almost nobody cares about any of those.

    meanwhile, you snipped the lengthy list of things ios had first, and
    that list isn't even complete.

    here it is again:
    retina displays, wide gamut displays, 64 bit processors, bluetooth le,
    face id, 3d touch, secure enclave, colorsync, truetone, arkit,
    airprint, homekit, healthkit, uwb, airdrop, magsafe, live photos,
    private relay, universal control, object capture, shortcuts, continuity
    & handoff, matter & thread, promotion, heif/hevc, app tracking
    transparency, sign-in with apple, javascript in hardware, animoji,
    passkey, apple pay later, tap to pay payments, continuity camera,
    facetime handoff, cinematic mode, share extensions, instant hotspot,
    bluetooth pair sync, lockscreen widgets, lidar and roomplan.

    i realize that you haven't any clue what most of those are, but that
    doesn't negate the fact that ios is almost always first with new stuff.

    The list is almost endless what Android has and what iOS can't do,

    nope. it's the other way around, which is why you snipped the list.

    very few things appear on android first. very few.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wade Garrett@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Sun Aug 7 08:06:12 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 8/7/22 3:16 AM, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Wade Garrett wrote:

    Andie-boy, you remind me of a guy who hates his hometown team but
    can't stay away from the ballpark where he regularly shows up to boo
    them and yell invectives...

    Hi Wade,

    Why can't you respond to the _facts_ instead of playing childish games?

    The facts are that only Apple operating systems die on you such that you
    can no longer update the default apps to the latest version on iOS.

    That's just a fact.
    It's a fact you _hate_ perhaps.

    But the fact you hate that fact doesn't change the fact that fact is a
    fact.

    *No other common consumer operating system _just dies_ like iOS does*
    The adult question is why.

    Are you an adult Wade?
    Or a child?

    Do you have an adult point of view Wade?
    Or only that of a child?

    Given you the benefit of the doubt, here's an adult question for you Wade: *Why can't an older iOS update the default apps to the latest version*
    *like all other common consumer operating systems habitually do?*

    Sure thing guy...you've reaffirmed my point. Give it a rest ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Sun Aug 7 19:56:04 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    nospam wrote:

    How long did it take for iOS to include even a rudimentary app drawer?
    What about default app selection nospam?
    And, um, er., when is IOS gonna get the ability to change the launcher?

    almost nobody cares about any of those.

    This is an ADULT CONVERSATION which most iKooks won't be able to fathom...

    My point is that I agree that Apple innovated a _lot_ of smartphone
    niceties that the Android market duly copied to provide to Android users.

    However, I'm not like you who only takes Apple's propaganda or like Steve
    who only shills for Verizon. I don't care if Apple comes up with a better
    tool than Android as long as Android can copy that tool (which the market
    will do for the Android users if it's a useful thing & not just a gimmick).

    On the other hand, a _lot_ of functionality was pioneered by Android, which
    is why I mentioned the app drawer, which, if you claim "nobody cares" then that's another reason why I know you have a low IQ because people do care.

    But for you to claim that "nobody cares" about setting app defaults is to simply prove you don't own the adult cognitive skills to recognize they do care. They care very much. Which is why Apple finally relented and copied Android's lead (albeit not very inclusively) in allow app default settings.

    meanwhile, you snipped the lengthy list of things ios had first, and
    that list isn't even complete.

    Look nospam, i.f you're going to have a conversation here, act like an adult. Again, I'm going to speak to you as if you own adult comprehensive skills.

    Nobody who is an adult disputes the fact that Apple came up with a _lot_ of nice features for the mobile phone audience that the Android market copied.

    Certainly I won't dispute that fact because only a fool disputes facts.

    A classic example of what Steve Jobs came up with is the fundamental
    interface we all use that Android copied and then allowed to be improved
    myriad ways (with the result that there are myriad launchers out there).

    Another example given Apple (admittedly falsely) markets itself as "privacy conscious" of where Android shamelessly copied Apple was in the privacy controls and in the privacy indicators that Android recently added.

    Most of the examples you gave are bullshit (or more accurately, trademarked marketed silly gimmicks); but some of the examples you provided were fair.

    Some were dead wrong (e.g., Apple Pay), but we've discussed this ad
    infinitum, so I didn't go down that rathole with you as you don't own the mental capacity to understand the history of electronic payment systems
    (nor do I care about them myself anyway so it wouldn't be worth my while).

    What you did is what you low-IQ no-education iKooks _always_ do, which was
    you brainlessly cut and pasted off the Internet a bullshit list (e.g.,
    "sign-in with apple"... WTF?) that had no meaning whatsoever, even to you.

    You actually think if we see a long list of trademark bullshit that we'll
    be duly "impressed" at all the great bullshit gimmicks Apple decided to
    name spending more researching the name than R&D creating the product.

    In that long list of bullshit, you add silly childish things (e.g.,
    "animoji") that show you have no concept of the difference between a mere marketing gimmick for kids versus actual functionalities for adults.

    many times, if they do appear on android, the implementation is not as
    good, notably bluetooth le, which took several *years* until android bluetooth le caught up to where apple had been.

    This is an ADULT conversation...

    While this belated copying of Apple by the Android market may be true in
    some cases that Android's copy of Apple features isn't "as good" as the
    actual Apple feature (e.g., "RCS"), the opposite is also true (e.g., Apple copying of app drawers" and "app defaults" is vastly substandard to
    Android's many implementations).

    Suffice to say the market dynamics determine the functionality.
    That's just a fact.

    Unfortunately, in overall summary, the creative market for Android is vast compared to the creative market for iOS in that Apple _restricts_ what the market can supply.

    Apple severely cripples that supply market in fundamental ways:
    1. Apple vastly restricts the APIs available to the app developers
    (e.g., it's impossible to get a torrent app on the app store)
    2. Apple vastly restricts some functionality to only Apple solutions
    (e.g., the default messenger app must be the Apple messenger app)
    1. Apple restricts technology innovation (e.g., webkit requirements)
    (e.g., the Tor Browser functionality is impossible on iOS)

    In summary, I realize this conversation contained far too many adult
    concepts for you to comprehend - but the point is that Apple products will _always_ have _lesser_ functionality than open market products simply
    because it's the MARKET who provides the functionality and yet, Apple
    vastly restricts what that open market is able to provide.

    They don't call it the walled garden for no reason.
    It's far more like a walled institutional prison cell if you ask me.

    Yet you iKooks _love_ being restricted and that's just fine.
    Just stop saying that it's not what it is, that's all I ask of you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sun Aug 7 20:20:53 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    Jolly Roger wrote:

    The level of unhappiness and hatred to cause this behavior must truly be hellish. And he does this to himself *willingly*. His existence is just pathetic.

    And yet none of you iKooks has any adult response to the facts I presented.

    *No other modern operating system dies sooner than does iOS.*
    That's just a fact.

    The fact is due to the primitive stone-age monolithic iOS design...
    *iOS just dies*

    You _hate_ that fact.
    But the fact you hate facts doesn't change the fact it's still a fact.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Wade Garrett on Sun Aug 7 20:18:30 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    Wade Garrett wrote:

    Sure thing guy...you've reaffirmed my point. Give it a rest ;-)

    Notice the fact you can't respond to a fact like an adult should.
    You _hate_ that the primitive iOS monolith lacks support longevity.
    *iOS just die*

    That's just a fact.
    Your belief system, however, isn't based on any actual facts.

    Your entire belief system is based purely on bullshit Apple marketing.

    Much like flat earthers are wont to do, in order to maintain your
    completely imaginary belief system, you respond with childish retorts.

    Yet the fact remains a fact when you understand what operating systems are.
    a. All modern operating common consumer operating systems update in layers.
    b. Except the laughably primitive stone-age iOS monolith.

    *That fact alone is why _iOS support dies sooner_ than all the others do*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Sun Aug 7 22:14:36 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    nospam wrote:

    Nobody who is an adult disputes the fact that Apple came up with a _lot_ of >> nice features for the mobile phone audience that the Android market copied.

    except for you and the other resident troll, which means by your own
    metric, you are both children.

    Only a fool disputes facts.

    I never dispute facts, nospam, except then they aren't facts, e.g., when
    Steve incessantly shilled for Verizon using calculated FCC coverage maps
    based on what the carriers provide and which didn't show _any_ 5G signal.

    Steve claimed those maps showed what they did not show.
    So I (successfully & correctly) disputed what Steve "claimed" was a fact.

    Either Steve knew that fact, or Steve didn't know that fact.
    Either say, it showed Steve lacked adult comprehensive skills.

    Rest assured, I do not lack basic adult comprehensive skills, nospam.
    Which means that I see right through almost every 'fact' you claim.

    Certainly I won't dispute that fact because only a fool disputes facts.

    then by your own metric, you are also a fool.

    In this thread nospam, it's _you_ who trolled the thread by claiming
    imaginary functionality for iOS that either you knew does NOT exist, or,
    that you "think" exists, either way it shows lack of adult comprehensive skills.

    The fact is Steve was _correct_ when he said iOS can't do the mock location
    the way Android does it - using the phone and the phone alone.

    Given you disputed that fact without providing a single credible fact to
    back up your (fabricated) claims, it's _you_ who is trolling this group.


    Most of the examples you gave are bullshit (or more accurately, trademarked >> marketed silly gimmicks); but some of the examples you provided were fair.

    all of them were fair.

    You always play this game nospam.
    You think everyone owns the same lack of adult comprehensive skills as you.

    Stop it.

    You found on the net some bullshit marketing list of bullshit from Apple
    and you cut and pasted that bullshit list thinking it would "impress" us.

    Wow. Oh wow. Oh my gawd! Apple can create marketing trademarks. Gee! Wow.
    Apple trademarks things _decades_ after others pioneered them, nospam.

    The fact Apple likely spends far more in trademark research than actual R&D
    of the products is an indicator that Apple also feels its users are stupid.

    But I'm not stupid nospam.
    You are stupid if you think I am.

    Stop it with the bullshit cut and paste of meaningless bullshit assuming
    I'll be duly impressed with a list of bullshit Apple trademarks. I'm not.

    Pick _one_ important item that I'd care about which you think Apple
    pioneered that the _current_ Android didn't copy as well as the _current_
    Apple implementation, and I'll check it out.

    But stop it with the bullshit pasting of a list of bullshit trademarks that even you don't know what they all stand for (since most are bullshit).

    Some were dead wrong (e.g., Apple Pay),

    apple pay was not mentioned,
    however, i'm glad you mentioned that,
    because apple pay did predate google pay (previously android pay) by a
    few years. thanks for mentioning something that i forgot to include.

    Bullshit. Android had electronic payment well before Apple did, but I
    really don't care as we've been down that rathole many times and you don't
    seem to own any adult comprehensive skills to even remember that fact.

    Just name _one_ important item that I'd care about that you think Apple pioneered that either Android does NOT have or that you think the Android implementation is substandard.

    The reason I have to care is that I'm not going to waste my time on your
    silly claims that Apple emoji matter because that's a bullshit item.

    what was mentioned was apply pay later, a new feature that's *part* of
    apple pay and not currently available with google pay. it lets people
    split a larger purchase into four interest-free payments over a six
    week period, thus the name 'later'.

    Android has electronic payment. Apple has electronic payment.
    Android is better in some ways. Apple is better in some ways.

    The fact is both have electronic payment so for your entire argument to be based on that means you have no argument, nospam.

    Stop basing your entire argument on bullshit.
    That works on dumbshits like the rest of you iKooks.

    But it doesn't work on intelligent people.

    Name one important functionality that you feel I would care about (because
    I'm not wasting my time on the stone-age dysfunctional webkit for example), that you feel iOS has that Android does not, and I'll take a look at it.

    Can you do something like that?
    It's what an _adult_ would do.

    another feature in the list is tap to pay, which lets the iphone owner *accept* contactless payments from others, and not just from other
    iphones using apple pay, but also from android phones via google pay or
    just tapping a contactless card. that means that just about anyone can
    now accept credit/debit card payments, even a kid mowing lawns.

    Again, your entire argument is based on Apple's marketing bullshit.
    Stop it.

    *Base your argument on facts like an adult should.*

    Name a single app functionality that you claim is on iOS that you claim is
    not on Android that I will care about (since I'm not wasting my time on
    privacy destroying marketing gimmicks like the ones you seem to favor).

    Name just one.

    What you did is what you low-IQ no-education iKooks _always_ do, which was >> you brainlessly cut and pasted off the Internet a bullshit list (e.g.,
    "sign-in with apple"... WTF?) that had no meaning whatsoever, even to you.

    sign-in with apple is a way to sign in to web sites without the web
    site knowing anything about you, since all they get is a unique and
    cryptic apple email that forwards to your actual email, which is kept
    hidden from said web site, something that a paranoid individual like
    you would want.

    it's a feature android does not have. it's that simple.

    If you think that I care about that bullshit Apple marketing gimmick, you
    don't own adult comprehensive skills nospam. First off, if it requires 2FA,
    you don't seem to own the adult comprehensive skills to know that Apple
    refuses to allow you to _ever_ turn 2FA off once you set it up (after the
    short grace period expires).

    Interestingly the judge threw out the court case against Apple for that
    because of the "caveat emptor" tenet of law which says, essentially, if
    you're so stupid that you click on the Apple "OK" button to agree to those Draconian terms, then the law isn't going to protect you from your own stupidity.

    Pick something that isn't something only fools do, nospam.

    You actually think if we see a long list of trademark bullshit that we'll
    be duly "impressed" at all the great bullshit gimmicks Apple decided to
    name spending more researching the name than R&D creating the product.

    almost none of what was listed is trademarked,

    Apple is the master of marketing gimmicks, nospam.
    I understand that stupid people fall for those marketing gimmicks.

    But let's keep this conversation at the adult level.
    So cut out the stupid marketing tricks, willya'.

    and that's irrelevant anyway.

    First off, that's wrong, but I don't care as I want to move forward on your claim that there is even one useful iOS app functionality that I'd care
    about (because I don't care about fancy childish bullshit like animoji gimmicks) that Apple has on the iPhone that isn't on Android.

    Certainly there is plenty of useful Android app functionality (such as what Steve wrote about in the mock GPS location thread) which isn't on iOS...

    But is there _anything_ on iOS that's useful to me that isn't on Android?

    Maybe. Maybe not.
    You claim there is.

    OK.
    *Name just one.*
    --
    HINT: It's what an adult would do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to spam@nospam.com on Sun Aug 7 16:38:38 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    In article <tcp1r8$1h1j$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    Nobody who is an adult disputes the fact that Apple came up with a _lot_ of nice features for the mobile phone audience that the Android market copied.

    except for you and the other resident troll, which means by your own
    metric, you are both children.

    Certainly I won't dispute that fact because only a fool disputes facts.

    then by your own metric, you are also a fool.




    Most of the examples you gave are bullshit (or more accurately, trademarked marketed silly gimmicks); but some of the examples you provided were fair.

    all of them were fair.

    Some were dead wrong (e.g., Apple Pay),

    apple pay was not mentioned, however, i'm glad you mentioned that,
    because apple pay did predate google pay (previously android pay) by a
    few years. thanks for mentioning something that i forgot to include.

    what was mentioned was apply pay later, a new feature that's *part* of
    apple pay and not currently available with google pay. it lets people
    split a larger purchase into four interest-free payments over a six
    week period, thus the name 'later'.

    another feature in the list is tap to pay, which lets the iphone owner
    *accept* contactless payments from others, and not just from other
    iphones using apple pay, but also from android phones via google pay or
    just tapping a contactless card. that means that just about anyone can
    now accept credit/debit card payments, even a kid mowing lawns.



    What you did is what you low-IQ no-education iKooks _always_ do, which was you brainlessly cut and pasted off the Internet a bullshit list (e.g., "sign-in with apple"... WTF?) that had no meaning whatsoever, even to you.

    sign-in with apple is a way to sign in to web sites without the web
    site knowing anything about you, since all they get is a unique and
    cryptic apple email that forwards to your actual email, which is kept
    hidden from said web site, something that a paranoid individual like
    you would want.

    it's a feature android does not have. it's that simple.

    You actually think if we see a long list of trademark bullshit that we'll
    be duly "impressed" at all the great bullshit gimmicks Apple decided to
    name spending more researching the name than R&D creating the product.

    almost none of what was listed is trademarked, and that's irrelevant
    anyway.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 8 09:38:49 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 8/7/22 3:16 AM, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Wade Garrett wrote:

    Andie-boy, you remind me of a guy who hates his hometown team but can't
    stay away from the ballpark where he regularly shows up to boo them and
    yell invectives...

    Hi Wade,

    Why can't you respond to the _facts_ instead of playing childish games?

    The facts are that only Apple operating systems die on you such that you
    can no longer update the default apps to the latest version on iOS.
    <snip>

    As usual, the moronic troll, having been proven wrong, now changes his fictional nonsense to yet more brainless crap.

    Try running the latest version of Microsoft's Edge web browser on
    Windows 3.0 computer. Try running the latest version of whatever crappy
    Android web browser on an Android 1.0 mobile device.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to spam@nospam.com on Sun Aug 7 17:47:05 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    In article <tcp9v1$l2b$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    Only a fool disputes facts.

    why do you keep calling yourself a fool?


    But I'm not stupid nospam.

    the evidence shows otherwise.





    Some were dead wrong (e.g., Apple Pay),

    apple pay was not mentioned,
    however, i'm glad you mentioned that,
    because apple pay did predate google pay (previously android pay) by a
    few years. thanks for mentioning something that i forgot to include.

    Bullshit. Android had electronic payment well before Apple did,

    except what google had required merchants to have a custom reader,
    which almost none did, plus all payments went through google using a
    single registered card, which mean google tracked everything you bought
    and purchases showed up as from google and not the actual store. that
    meant it's both hard to track things on your statement and credit cards
    didn't see the categories, so the user loses out on any rewards. not
    only was it very rare, but it didn't work well.

    apple pay is built upon industry standard emv instead of a proprietary
    system, which means the user can use it *anywhere* contactless cards
    are accepted, using any or all of their existing cards. purchases show
    up on the credit card statement as they normally would and apple has no
    idea what anyone bought.

    google immediately started working on android pay, which was released
    about two years later, later renamed to google pay.



    Android has electronic payment. Apple has electronic payment.
    Android is better in some ways. Apple is better in some ways.

    goalpost movement.



    another feature in the list is tap to pay, which lets the iphone owner *accept* contactless payments from others, and not just from other
    iphones using apple pay, but also from android phones via google pay or just tapping a contactless card. that means that just about anyone can
    now accept credit/debit card payments, even a kid mowing lawns.

    Again, your entire argument is based on Apple's marketing bullshit.

    it's not marketing bullshit. tap to pay is an extremely useful feature,
    one that you clearly don't understand.


    First off, if it requires 2FA,
    you don't seem to own the adult comprehensive skills to know that Apple refuses to allow you to _ever_ turn 2FA off once you set it up (after the short grace period expires).

    good thing google doesn't do that.

    oh wait...

    <https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/11/google-wants-every-account-to-u se-2fa-starts-auto-enrolling-users/>
    Google announced earlier this year that it is planning to forcefully
    transition as many of its users as possible to two-factor
    authentication (2FA). The company elaborated further in October,
    saying it was planning to auto-enroll 150 million Google accounts
    in 2FA by the end of the year.
    ...
    Google's support page details the auto-enrollment process. The
    company says accounts that have been flagged for 2FA will get an
    email or notification about seven days before the requirement is
    enforced.

    note that google is *forcefully* *transitioning* users.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to YourName@YourISP.com on Sun Aug 7 17:47:02 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    In article <tcpbd9$1445$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Your Name
    <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    Try running the latest version of Microsoft's Edge web browser on
    Windows 3.0 computer.

    no need to go back that far. it doesn't work on early win10 versions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to Your Name on Sun Aug 7 23:21:22 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    Your Name wrote:

    As usual, the moronic troll, having been proven wrong, now changes his fictional nonsense to yet more brainless crap.

    I find it interesting that "Your Name" said that Windows costs money when
    you upgrade, and multiple people (some of whom are his fellow iKooks) had
    to explain to him that his belief system was based on exactly zero facts.

    The fact was that the _entire_ belief system of Your Name... was imaginary.

    Then... after _that_ event occurred in this very thread... he calls
    everyone else... a "moronic troll". You have to see the humor in that.

    HINT: He's so stupid that he doesn't even realize how stupid he really is.

    Try running the latest version of Microsoft's Edge web browser on
    Windows 3.0 computer. Try running the latest version of whatever crappy Android web browser on an Android 1.0 mobile device.

    Assuming anyone on this child-like Apple newsgroup is an adult, here is a
    "fair fight" factual comparison we can make that will provide some facts.


    a. Tell us what the oldest iOS is that the newest Safari loads & works on.
    b. I will look up the oldest Android that the newest Chrome does the same.

    That's an objective starting point for an _adult_ discussion, is it not?
    --
    This comparison was requested moments ago in this adult factual thread.
    *Why do Apple operating systems *just die* while all modern operating systems last, essentially, almost forever?*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/T_-7sEITUKs>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Sun Aug 7 23:25:59 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    nospam wrote:

    Try running the latest version of Microsoft's Edge web browser on
    Windows 3.0 computer.

    no need to go back that far. it doesn't work on early win10 versions.

    As someone already said in this thread, it might not be fair to compare desktops to mobile devices, because desktops are so mature that Windows 10
    will still work just fine on desktops built before iOS even existed.

    Given Widnows 10 is the most common version out there today, a more fair comparison would probably be to compare what Windows 10 works on versus
    what the most common current Mac OS works on.

    But this thread is more about mobile devices, not the fact that Windows
    works on desktops built before the first release of iOS ever shipped.

    What would be more appropriate is to compare mobile platforms instead.

    Here's a fair comparison, is it not?
    a. Tell us what the oldest iOS is that the newest Safari loads & works on.
    b. I will look up the oldest Android that the newest Chrome does the same.

    That's an objective starting point for an _adult_ discussion, is it not?
    --
    This comparison was requested moments ago in this adult factual thread.
    *Why do Apple operating systems *just die* while all modern operating
    systems last, essentially, almost forever?*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/T_-7sEITUKs>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to spam@nospam.com on Sun Aug 7 18:38:01 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    In article <tcpe4s$1vpt$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    Windows 10
    will still work just fine on desktops built before iOS even existed.

    no it doesn't. at best it's very, very slow and not the latest version
    either.

    15 year old pcs no longer get win10 updates, stopping around 1903 or so
    (give or take), which has been eol'ed and is no longer supported by
    microsoft.

    <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/announcements/windows-10-190 3-end-of-servicing>
    Windows 10, version 1903 will reach the end of service on December 8,
    2020.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to nospam on Mon Aug 8 00:48:01 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    nospam wrote:

    Again, your entire argument is based on Apple's marketing bullshit.

    it's not marketing bullshit. tap to pay is an extremely useful feature,
    one that you clearly don't understand.

    You don't seem to own the cognitive skills to comprehend that you can
    cherry pick _any_ functionality on the planet, and then compare two
    different makers of that functionality, and then argue one is better than
    the other using your own personal comparitive assessment weights.

    It's like comparing a Bimmer to a Mercedes.
    There will _always_ be differences you may care about.

    Say one doesn't come in red for example - and you happen to like red.
    Then you'll claim the functionality is better.

    Just like iPhone colors are a desperate attempt at differentiation.

    But this is a digression which you foisted upon us because you _hate_ the
    fact that iOS app updates die far sooner than apps on any other platform

    First off, if it requires 2FA,
    you don't seem to own the adult comprehensive skills to know that Apple
    refuses to allow you to _ever_ turn 2FA off once you set it up (after the
    short grace period expires).

    good thing google doesn't do that.

    This is an _adult_ conversation...
    The problem with iKooks is you think everyone is as gullible as you are.

    Google is eager to follow Apple's anti-privacy lead so I wouldn't doubt
    that Google would hope its customer base is as gullible as Apple's base is.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/YqWvzF4W/fairemail02.jpg> Android OTP options

    As you may be well aware, I've been following the recent May 30th 2022
    attempt by Google to trade our privacy for security - where only very
    recently the free ad free GSF free privacy based apps finally recovered
    from Google's attack on privacy with the implementation of web OAUth.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nhHFRK3L/fairemail03.jpg> web-OAuth example

    Until then, I wasn't able to privately read Google gmail on Android from
    May 30th, 2022, to about July 25th, 2022 (but I can now - which is what
    matters - but which took work by Marcel & Christian to update web-OAuth).

    note that google is *forcefully* *transitioning* users.

    As you may be aware from the adult OS newsgroups, I was in frequent contact with the developer of Fair Email and that of K-9 Mail (now part of Thunderbird's suite of tools) where Marcel & Christian worked together to overcome Google's not-so-hidden attempt at forcing users into 2FA/2SV.

    While Google certainly pulled an anti-privacy trick out of Apple's own
    2SV/2FA playbook, as far as I'm aware, web-OAUth overcomes that attempt.

    At this point, I'm unaware of any "successful" attempt at forcing typical privacy-conscious Android google email server users into the hated 2FA/2SV.

    However, if you know more than I do about Google "forcing" 2FA/2SV on
    people like me who simply want to read mail on Google servers, please
    post facts - not bullshit.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Jz0TvyKQ/fairemail01.jpg> FairEmail auth options

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to nospam on Fri Aug 12 02:02:21 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    In article <tcpe4s$1vpt$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    Windows 10
    will still work just fine on desktops built before iOS even existed.

    no it doesn't. at best it's very, very slow and not the latest version either.

    15 year old pcs no longer get win10 updates, stopping around 1903 or so
    (give or take), which has been eol'ed and is no longer supported by microsoft.

    <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/announcements/windows-10-190 3-end-of-servicing>
    Windows 10, version 1903 will reach the end of service on December 8,
    2020.

    I think this has gotten far afield from the OP which was narrowly about how long after iOS 16 is released will phones stuck with iOS 15 be supported
    with updates. Some might not want the iPhone 13 yet not want to wait
    through the buzz over iPhone 14 dying down after its release.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to nospam on Fri Aug 12 02:20:56 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    In article <tcpe4s$1vpt$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    Windows 10
    will still work just fine on desktops built before iOS even existed.

    no it doesn't. at best it's very, very slow and not the latest version either.

    15 year old pcs no longer get win10 updates, stopping around 1903 or so
    (give or take), which has been eol'ed and is no longer supported by microsoft.

    <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/announcements/windows-10-190 3-end-of-servicing>
    Windows 10, version 1903 will reach the end of service on December 8,
    2020.

    Server hiccups.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to ecphoric@allspamis.invalid on Fri Aug 12 02:21:31 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
    nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    In article <tcpe4s$1vpt$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    Windows 10
    will still work just fine on desktops built before iOS even existed.

    no it doesn't. at best it's very, very slow and not the latest version
    either.

    15 year old pcs no longer get win10 updates, stopping around 1903 or so
    (give or take), which has been eol'ed and is no longer supported by
    microsoft.

    <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/announcements/windows-10-190
    3-end-of-servicing>
    Windows 10, version 1903 will reach the end of service on December 8,
    2020.

    Server hiccups.

    Yup!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)