Would be nice to have an option to turn off that 10 minute limit for say
12 hours. I'm thinking of long rides on charter buses, something that's
pretty common for high school trips where the students like exchanging
photos, etc..
fabricated scenario. they do that in other ways, such as imessage,
instagram, etc.
Go ahead and show us verified instances of
successful Bluetooth attacks against up-to-date iPhones in the wild
outside of a lab, "smart" guy. Not holding our breaths, because we
already know you have nothing.
Jolly Roger wrote:
Go ahead and show us verified instances of successful Bluetooth
attacks against up-to-date iPhones in the wild outside of a lab,
"smart" guy. Not holding our breaths, because we already know you
have nothing.
I wonder if Jolly Roger ran a simple search before posting that drivel? <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=apple+iphone+bluetooth+vulnerability>
On 2022-12-09, Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
Jolly Roger wrote:
Go ahead and show us verified instances of successful Bluetooth
attacks against up-to-date iPhones in the wild outside of a lab,
"smart" guy. Not holding our breaths, because we already know you
have nothing.
I wonder if Jolly Roger ran a simple search before posting that drivel?
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=apple+iphone+bluetooth+vulnerability>
As predicted, you can't produce one actual instance of a successful
Bluetooth attack against up-to-date iPhones in the wild outside of a
lab, so you resort to posting a web search instead. You and your little
troll gang are the weakest, most ineffective trolls on Usenet. You're
all pathetic. : )
As predicted, you can't produce one actual instance of a successful
Bluetooth attack against up-to-date iPhones in the wild outside of a
lab, so you resort to posting a web search instead.
Jolly Roger wrote:
As predicted, you can't produce one actual instance of a successful
Bluetooth attack against up-to-date iPhones in the wild outside of a
lab, so you resort to posting a web search instead.
Hi Jolly Roger,
*It's a fact no smartphone has more zero-day holes than Apple iPhones.*
It's long been published that even Apple executives deplore how poorly
Apple software quality control is, where we published Federighi's letter himself sent out to engineering asking them to stop fucking up (e.g., Apple shipped the _same_ zero-day bug twice in two non-consecutive releases!).
It's also well published Apple coding is so bad that no smart phone on this planet has _more_ zero-day holes than do the latest iOS releases, where the whole world knows Apple _adds_ a new zero day hole in iOS once a month!
The fact Apple has never in its entire history ever found these published zero-day holes, means Apple can't fix them until _someone else_ tells Apple about them (and only the "good guys" are going to be doing that).
With Apple's coding well documented to be the absolute _worst_ in the
world, and with all those bluetooth holes in Apple products, on what basis are you so very confident that the current bluetooth holes are all found?
Bear in mind, no smartphone has more zero day holes than Apple smartphones.
SUGGESTION: Try to refute that fact, Jolly Roger. See if you can.
HINT: You can't. Apple is the worst in the entire world, bar none.
Yeah. Customizable for the user.
Hopefully we'll see that in a future iOS version.
Let's leave a feedback in https://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone/ so
Apple can add it to v16.3 or later.
don't hold your breath on that. it's not gonna happen.
On 2022-12-09 13:22, Andy Burnelli wrote:
Jolly Roger wrote:
As predicted, you can't produce one actual instance of a successful
Bluetooth attack against up-to-date iPhones in the wild outside of a
lab, so you resort to posting a web search instead.
Hi Jolly Roger,
*It's a fact no smartphone has more zero-day holes than Apple
iPhones.*
That's not a fact.
It's an assertion.
You should look up those words:
"fact"
"assertion"
He doesn't care about words. Like Trump and his lame-brain supporters,
words are just weapons of hate to sling around without care of their
actual meanings. Arlen and his little trollboi gang don't care about
factual and honest discourse. They are happy to make bullshit claims and
bad faith arguments in order to try to disrupt what would otherwise be peaceful and useful newsgroups. They are here for one purpose:
disruption.
But with all of his words, Arlen still can't produce one actual instance
of a successful Bluetooth attack against up-to-date iPhones in the wild outside of a lab. Like the rest of them, his troll is a *failure*.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
On 2022-12-09, Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
Jolly Roger wrote:
Go ahead and show us verified instances of successful Bluetooth
attacks against up-to-date iPhones in the wild outside of a lab,
"smart" guy. Not holding our breaths, because we already know you
have nothing.
I wonder if Jolly Roger ran a simple search before posting that
drivel?
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=apple+iphone+bluetooth+vulnerability>
As predicted, you can't produce one actual instance of a successful
Bluetooth attack against up-to-date iPhones in the wild outside of a
lab, so you resort to posting a web search instead. You and your
little troll gang are the weakest, most ineffective trolls on Usenet.
You're all pathetic. : )
Arlen is famous for posting links that do not support his Absurd Claim
Of The Day.
Jolly Roger wrote:
He doesn't care about words. Like Trump and his lame-brain
supporters, words are just weapons of hate to sling around without
care of their actual meanings. Arlen and his little trollboi gang
don't care about factual and honest discourse. They are happy to make
bullshit claims and bad faith arguments in order to try to disrupt
what would otherwise be peaceful and useful newsgroups. They are here
for one purpose: disruption.
But with all of his words, Arlen still can't produce one actual
instance of a successful Bluetooth attack against up-to-date iPhones
in the wild outside of a lab. Like the rest of them, his troll is a
*failure*.
you hate the facts
Jolly Roger wrote:
He doesn't care about words. Like Trump and his lame-brain supporters, words are just weapons of hate to sling around without care of their
actual meanings. Arlen and his little trollboi gang don't care about factual and honest discourse. They are happy to make bullshit claims and bad faith arguments in order to try to disrupt what would otherwise be peaceful and useful newsgroups. They are here for one purpose:
disruption.
But with all of his words, Arlen still can't produce one actual instance
of a successful Bluetooth attack against up-to-date iPhones in the wild outside of a lab. Like the rest of them, his troll is a *failure*.
Hi Jolly Roger,
The observation you hate the facts doesn't change that the facts are facts.
I don't see anything from the likes of Bob Campbell or Alan Baker or Snit,
so all I can see is you denying all facts about Apple that you happen to hate, which, let's be clear, is a _lot_ of facts that you seem to hate.
FACT: *No smartphone OS has more zero-day holes than does Apple's iOS!*
The fact is well known iOS has about a zero-day hole every month for years
on end, so for you to deny that fact simply means that you hate that fact.
It's also a fact that Apple has _never_ found any iOS zero-day holes, which is another fact you happen to hate simply because that fact _is_ a fact.
The only metric you can possibly argue is if you find that Android has as many or more zero-day holes in the same time period as iOS clearly has had.
And you can't.
Hence, given you've denied all facts that you hate about Apple, it's my assertion (based on that observation), that you hate this proven fact:
*No smartphone operating system has more zero-day holes than does iOS*
That's just a fact.
That's just a fact you hate.
That's just a fact you hate about Apple.
The observation you hate the facts doesn't change that the facts are facts.
But I don't expect gullible idiot trolls to understand such nuance. You
dip shits will take every chance you can get to spread your "Apple: BAD" propaganda you've been spoon fed, like the little gullible fools you are.
You're a one-trick pony,
continuously repeating the same old,
tired talking points because you have nothing else to offer.
You're a pathetic, boring ineffective troll,
He's a boring, old one-trick pony of a troll. He thinks repeating
bullshit gives it more weight, because he assumes everyone is just as gullible and foolish as he is, and will confuse repetition for
authoritative discussion like he does. He's a pathetic excuse of a human being.
Interesting. You have failed to produce even one example of the event requested. I suspect that you cannot. I further suspect that most/all of the ¡facts¢ that you¢re on about cannot be supported by actual events and
are, therefore, NOT facts, except in your diseased mind.
To refute this is simple: produce an example as requested by JR. Just one, fulfilling his stated requirements. I don¢t think that you can. I know that you have not, so far, done this.
He has, however, achieved his goal. This is apparent from your
response. Andy has been around a long time, and very successful.
And you still have failed to supply even one example.
WolfFan wrote:
Interesting. You have failed to produce even one example of the event requested. I suspect that you cannot. I further suspect that most/all of the
�facts� that you�re on about cannot be supported by actual events and are, therefore, NOT facts, except in your diseased mind.
To refute this is simple: produce an example as requested by JR. Just one, fulfilling his stated requirements. I don�t think that you can. I know that
you have not, so far, done this.
Facts.
You iKooks _hate_ all facts because of two things:
a. Your entire belief system isn't based on even a _single_ fact, and,
b. You iKooks are ignorant of the facts _everyone_ else already knows!
Hence, I agree with Wolffan that iKooks have not produced a _single_ reference refuting the extremely well known facts which we discussed with cites many times on this ng - and which only iKooks could possibly deny.
1. No smartphone has more zero-day holes than does iOS
(On average, iOS adds a new zero-day hole every single month!)
2. No smartphone kernel is infected by Pegasus spyware other than iOS.
(The Android kernel has never been infected while iOS has, many times).
3. Apple has _never_ found these zero-day holes (someone else did!).
These are facts that are so well known that for an iKook to ask for confirmation is an admission that the iKooks are completely ignorant.
In fact, that fact is proof the iKooks' entire belief system, isn't
actually based on _any_ facts - since they're unaware of these facts.
On Dec 10, 2022, Andy Burnelli wrote
(in article <tn36a2$9ea$1@gioia.aioe.org>):
WolfFan wrote:
Interesting. You have failed to produce even one example of the event
requested. I suspect that you cannot. I further suspect that most/all of the
�facts� that you�re on about cannot be supported by actual events and
are, therefore, NOT facts, except in your diseased mind.
To refute this is simple: produce an example as requested by JR. Just one, >> > fulfilling his stated requirements. I don�t think that you can. I know >> > that
you have not, so far, done this.
Facts.
You iKooks _hate_ all facts because of two things:
a. Your entire belief system isn't based on even a _single_ fact, and,
b. You iKooks are ignorant of the facts _everyone_ else already knows!
Hence, I agree with Wolffan that iKooks have not produced a _single_
reference refuting the extremely well known facts which we discussed with
cites many times on this ng - and which only iKooks could possibly deny.
1. No smartphone has more zero-day holes than does iOS
(On average, iOS adds a new zero-day hole every single month!)
2. No smartphone kernel is infected by Pegasus spyware other than iOS.
(The Android kernel has never been infected while iOS has, many times).
3. Apple has _never_ found these zero-day holes (someone else did!).
These are facts that are so well known that for an iKook to ask for
confirmation is an admission that the iKooks are completely ignorant.
In fact, that fact is proof the iKooks' entire belief system, isn't
actually based on _any_ facts - since they're unaware of these facts.
And you still have failed to supply even one example.
He's literally a broken record, constantly repeating the same, old,
tired lines.
He's a boring, ineffective troll.
His only purpose here is to disrupt.
Jolly Roger wrote:
He's literally a broken record, constantly repeating the same, old,
tired lines.
I find it no longer shocking you think all facts about Apple are boring.
He's a boring, ineffective troll.
It's no longer shocking you think _all_ facts about Apple are trolls.
His only purpose here is to disrupt.
I went to the finest schools in this country, and I worked at the toughest startups in Silicon Valley for decades on end (retiring early from that).
Hence I've never met people, in the flesh, like you iKooks are, JR.
a. You have no intellect
b. You have no education
c. And you love Apple (because you believe what Apple fed you to believe!)
You iKooks interest me because I've never met people like you who were told your whole lives that you were stupid - and then you found Apple loves you.
Apple loves ignorant people like you.
And in turn, you finally found someone who loves you back, Jolly Roger.
The observation remains Apple can't make those ungodly profits off of
normal people - Apple _needs_ people who are exactly like you are, JR.
Which is why you interest me.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 06:10:06 |
| Calls: | 10,386 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,058 |
| Messages: | 6,416,633 |