1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.SYS.MAC.ADVOCACY

  • Where is the efficiency Apple has claimed for years for the iPhone?

    From Marion@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 20 17:31:35 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Q: Where is the efficiency Apple has claimed for years for the iPhone?
    A: It doesn't exist.

    Apple lied.
    Again

    Why is it you trolls (like Alan Baker) believe only Apple's lies?
    Why can't any of you trolls think for yourself for once in your lives?

    Apple's claims are clever though... as they're based on the CPU efficiency.
    Not on the phone efficiency.

    And, when the EU reports clearly proved Apple lied, I love Apple's excuse. Guess what Apple's (lame) excuse was.

    C'mon. Guess.


    HINT: Not a single independent testing lab said iPhones scored an A.
    Only in Apple's (obviously bogus) "internal" tests did it score an A.

    As always, Apple lied.
    Again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Marion on Sun Jul 20 20:33:22 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 20, 2025 at 1:31:35 PM EDT, "Marion" <marion@facts.com> wrote:

    Q: Where is the efficiency Apple has claimed for years for the iPhone?

    Same as always. Getting better runtimes with smaller batteries than most Android junk. You KNOW this is true. Everyone here KNOWS this is true. It has been proven here. YOU HELPED TO PROVE IT.

    Arlen lied.

    Again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Mon Jul 21 01:12:59 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 20:33:22 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    Q: Where is the efficiency Apple has claimed for years for the iPhone?

    Same as always. Getting better runtimes with smaller batteries than most Android junk. You KNOW this is true. Everyone here KNOWS this is true. It has
    been proven here. YOU HELPED TO PROVE IT.

    The fact remains that almost every major OEM phone maker scored at least
    one "A" on efficiency in the new June 20th 2025 phone efficiency ratings.
    <https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669>

    Except Apple.
    *What we learned from the iPhone energy labels Apple was forced to add*
    <https://bgr.com/tech/8-things-we-learned-from-the-iphone-energy-labels-apple-was-forced-to-add-in-europe/>

    After years of claiming efficiency, we find out the iPhone isn't efficient. Apple lied.
    Again.

    The iPad is even worse.
    Most scored a "G" (which is after "F", by the way).
    Only one iPad did better than an "F".

    Even my four-year old free Android has a better battery than in the iPhone.
    iPhone 16 Pro Max ¡V 4,685 mAh
    iPhone 16 Pro ¡V 3,582 mAh
    iPhone 16 Plus ¡V 4,674 mAh
    iPhone 16 ¡V 3,561 mAh
    iPhone 16e ¡V 4,005 mAh
    iPhone 15 Plus ¡V 4,383 mAh
    iPhone 15 ¡V 3,349 mAh

    Recharge the phone every day, and you'll get about three years of use.
    Which is a *lot* less than my free Android - which is still going strong.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Marion on Mon Jul 21 01:43:02 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 20, 2025 at 9:12:59 PM EDT, "Marion" <marion@facts.com> wrote:

    Recharge the phone every day, and you'll get about three years of use.
    Which is a *lot* less than my free Android - which is still going strong.

    And I have an iPhone 8 Plus that still has 99% of its original battery capacity. What's your point again?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Marion on Mon Jul 21 14:49:05 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:43:52 -0000 (UTC), Marion wrote :


    Your piece of crap iPhone 8 Plus has a bargain-basement garbage battery. Apple claims, for the iPHone 7 Plus the "battery is designed to retain up
    to 80% of its original capacity at 500 complete charge cycles when
    operating under normal conditions."

    Correction:
    "for the iPhone *8* Plus the "battery is designed to retain up
    to 80% of its original capacity at 500 complete charge cycles".

    That's less than 3 years, Tyrone for your garbage piece of shit battery.

    Face the facts, Tyrone.
    Apple puts garbage components into the iPhone.

    *Your 2,691 mAh battery is a joke.*
    You paid through the nose for el cheapo garbage components in that iPhone.

    It's illegal to sell your iPhone new in the EU even if Apple wanted to.
    It's that crappy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Mon Jul 21 14:43:52 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 01:43:02 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    Recharge the phone every day, and you'll get about three years of use.
    Which is a *lot* less than my free Android - which is still going strong.

    And I have an iPhone 8 Plus that still has 99% of its original battery capacity. What's your point again?

    Heh heh heh. The iPhone 8 Plus has a 2,691 mAh which is utter crap, Tyrone.

    Why Apple puts that garbage in your *expensive* iPhone is one thing, but
    why people like you who know NOTHING about Apple buy it, is something else.

    If you get three years out of that laughably puny battery, you're lucky.

    These bogus claims from you Apple trolls are worthless since I can claim
    that my phone lasts five years on a single charge - which is just as much a
    lie as Tyrone's claim that his iPhone isn't subject to battery physics.

    Why is it nobody on the Android newsgroup feels the need to lie as much as these Apple trolls lie just to defend their beloved religion to the death.

    Lithium-ion batteries have a finite number of charge cycles before their capacity significantly degrades.

    The EU rules require *NEW* mobile device batteries to retain at least 80% capacity after 800 cycles, and only Apple's *latest* phones comply. https://regulatoryinfo.apple.com/cwt/api/ext/file?fileId=whitePaperEnergyLabels/EU_Energy_Label_for_iPhone_and_iPad_EN_1749628569689.pdf

    Your piece of crap iPhone 8 Plus has a bargain-basement garbage battery.
    Apple claims, for the iPHone 7 Plus the "battery is designed to retain up
    to 80% of its original capacity at 500 complete charge cycles when
    operating under normal conditions."

    Assuming you use 1/2 the your laughably puny garbage battery capacity a
    day, that's 1000 days, which is less than three years, Tyrone.

    Those are figures from Apple. <https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208387>
    That you must lie to defend that garbage battery is telling, Tyrone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Mon Jul 21 10:51:51 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-20 10:31, Marion wrote:
    Q: Where is the efficiency Apple has claimed for years for the iPhone?
    A: It doesn't exist.

    Apple lied.
    Again

    Why is it you trolls (like Alan Baker) believe only Apple's lies?
    Why can't any of you trolls think for yourself for once in your lives?

    Apple's claims are clever though... as they're based on the CPU efficiency. Not on the phone efficiency.

    And, when the EU reports clearly proved Apple lied, I love Apple's excuse. Guess what Apple's (lame) excuse was.

    C'mon. Guess.


    HINT: Not a single independent testing lab said iPhones scored an A.
    Only in Apple's (obviously bogus) "internal" tests did it score an A.
    You've previously claimed that Apple used the same independent testing
    labs as everyone else.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)