• Why is the iPhone always lacking in basic industry standard hardware fu

    From Marion@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 23 01:09:40 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Why is the iPhone always lacking in basic industry standard hardware functionality?

    While every iPhone lacks basic hardware, most of Android has it.

    This Android search shows 2,114 Android phones with the sd slot included.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2&idCardslot=1>

    That's out of 3205 Android phones (if I remove the sd slot criteria).
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2>

    That means 66% of Android phones out there still have the sd slot hardware.

    Out of 223 Samsung Android phones currently being sold today
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2>

    Out of those 223, 165 have the sd slot, which is 74% of Samsung phones.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sMakers=9&sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2&idCardslot=1>

    As for Sony's 22 models currently sold today, 100% have the sd slot.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sMakers=7&sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2>
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sMakers=7&sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2&idCardslot=1>

    There are things a phone with a card in the sd slot can do that are
    impossible to do any other way - so I agree it's a critically important
    basic hardware feature if you want to make the most of your phone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Tue Jul 22 18:41:56 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-22 18:09, Marion wrote:
    Why is the iPhone always lacking in basic industry standard hardware functionality?

    While every iPhone lacks basic hardware, most of Android has it.

    This Android search shows 2,114 Android phones with the sd slot included.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2&idCardslot=1>
    That's out of 3205 Android phones (if I remove the sd slot criteria).
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2>

    That means 66% of Android phones out there still have the sd slot hardware.

    Which proves... ...what?


    Out of 223 Samsung Android phones currently being sold today
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2>

    Out of those 223, 165 have the sd slot, which is 74% of Samsung phones.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sMakers=9&sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2&idCardslot=1>

    Same question.


    As for Sony's 22 models currently sold today, 100% have the sd slot.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sMakers=7&sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2>
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sMakers=7&sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2&idCardslot=1>

    There are things a phone with a card in the sd slot can do that are impossible to do any other way - so I agree it's a critically important
    basic hardware feature if you want to make the most of your phone.

    But do people really end up DOING those things...

    ...and how many of those phones never ever have an SD card IN the slot?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Jul 23 03:14:09 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 22, 2025 at 9:09:40 PM EDT, "Marion" <marion@facts.com> wrote:

    Why is the iPhone always lacking in basic industry standard hardware functionality?

    It isn't. Because its not the year 2005.

    If 65% (and dropping) of Android phones have it, how is that an "industry standard"?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com on Wed Jul 23 03:28:44 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 22, 2025 at 11:03:20 PM EDT, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:

    Having an SD slot would be very useful. Last month when my wife and I went
    on vacation to California, it was a chore trying to combine all the videos and pictures from both our phones into one picture folder on the computer.

    That's because you don't have iPhones and iCloud.

    I had to play around with several apps and/or local network connections to transfer all the files from both phones, especially large videos, to the computer by WiFi. Then I had to sort them, delete ones we didn’t like, rename them to something which makes sense.

    That's because you don't have iPhones and iCloud.

    If we had SD slots I could have just saved all my pictures to the card, handed her the card next to save all her pictures to it, copy them to the computer. Then arrange and rename them using a real keyboard and finally
    copy whatever we wanted back to the phones.

    That is WAY more complicated. And manual. Not automatic. The whole point of computers and networks is to AUTOMATE chores like this.

    Using an SD card to get the files on the computer and back to the phone
    would have been much easier and intuitive.

    That's funny. My wife and I combine photos all the time without using antique hardware. That's because we have modern hardware. We have iPhones and iPads.
    She texts me the photos or videos, I save them (using my iPhone or iPad). These ALL get automatically downloaded to my Windows PCs AND my Macs.

    Or I can text her MY photos, she saves them (using her iPhone or iPad) and
    they all get automatically downloaded to HER Windows PC.

    Done.

    Why you want to fiddle around manually swapping antique cards is a mystery.
    But then, we live in the 21st century. You and Arlen are still stuck in 2005.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Tue Jul 22 20:48:46 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-22 20:03, badgolferman wrote:
    Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    Why is the iPhone always lacking in basic industry standard hardware
    functionality?

    While every iPhone lacks basic hardware, most of Android has it.

    This Android search shows 2,114 Android phones with the sd slot included.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2&idCardslot=1>

    That's out of 3205 Android phones (if I remove the sd slot criteria).
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2>

    That means 66% of Android phones out there still have the sd slot hardware. >>
    Out of 223 Samsung Android phones currently being sold today
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2>

    Out of those 223, 165 have the sd slot, which is 74% of Samsung phones.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sMakers=9&sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2&idCardslot=1>

    As for Sony's 22 models currently sold today, 100% have the sd slot.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sMakers=7&sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2>
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sMakers=7&sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2&idCardslot=1>

    There are things a phone with a card in the sd slot can do that are
    impossible to do any other way - so I agree it's a critically important
    basic hardware feature if you want to make the most of your phone.


    Having an SD slot would be very useful. Last month when my wife and I went
    on vacation to California, it was a chore trying to combine all the videos and pictures from both our phones into one picture folder on the computer.

    Because you're incompetent?


    I had to play around with several apps and/or local network connections to transfer all the files from both phones, especially large videos, to the computer by WiFi. Then I had to sort them, delete ones we didn’t like, rename them to something which makes sense.

    If we had SD slots I could have just saved all my pictures to the card, handed her the card next to save all her pictures to it, copy them to the computer. Then arrange and rename them using a real keyboard and finally
    copy whatever we wanted back to the phones.

    Or you could have just connected the phones to the computer and copied
    the files directly...


    Using an SD card to get the files on the computer and back to the phone
    would have been much easier and intuitive.

    You could have bought phones with SD cards, so why didn't you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Wed Jul 23 04:55:45 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 03:14:09 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    Why is the iPhone always lacking in basic industry standard hardware
    functionality?

    It isn't. Because its not the year 2005.

    If 65% (and dropping) of Android phones have it, how is that an "industry standard"?

    Fact: Most Android phones have sd card slots.
    Assessment: They don't put them there for no reason.

    Fact: All iPhones have no sd card slots.
    Assessment: Apple isn't stupid. Apple didn't put it for a reason.

    Fact: Without the sd slot, you can't do a *lot* that you can with it. Assessment: Apple is glad to provide you, for a fee, something close.

    Apple isn't stupid.
    The reason the slot doesn't exist is so that you'll buy it back from Apple.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Tue Jul 22 22:30:34 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-22 21:55, Marion wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 03:14:09 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    Why is the iPhone always lacking in basic industry standard hardware
    functionality?

    It isn't. Because its not the year 2005.

    If 65% (and dropping) of Android phones have it, how is that an "industry
    standard"?

    Fact: Most Android phones have sd card slots.
    Assessment: They don't put them there for no reason.

    Fact: Fewer and fewer Android phones have SD cards slots.

    2022: 598 Android phones: 398 with SD card slots (66.6%)
    2023: 497 Android phones: 308 with SD card slots (61.9%)
    2024: 562 Android phones: 329 with SD card slots (58.5%)

    Seeing a trend yet?


    Fact: All iPhones have no sd card slots.
    Assessment: Apple isn't stupid. Apple didn't put it for a reason.

    Fact: Without the sd slot, you can't do a *lot* that you can with it. Assessment: Apple is glad to provide you, for a fee, something close.

    Fact: that statement of "Fact" you just wrote... ...isn't a fact.

    "A *lot*" is an ASSESSMENT.


    Apple isn't stupid.
    The reason the slot doesn't exist is so that you'll buy it back from Apple.

    What things can you do with an SD card slot that you can even buy back
    from Apple?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Wed Jul 23 15:32:14 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-23, Tyrone <none@none.none> wrote:
    On Jul 22, 2025 at 11:03:20 PM EDT, "badgolferman"
    <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:

    Having an SD slot would be very useful. Last month when my wife and I went >> on vacation to California, it was a chore trying to combine all the videos >> and pictures from both our phones into one picture folder on the computer.

    That's because you don't have iPhones and iCloud.

    I had to play around with several apps and/or local network connections to >> transfer all the files from both phones, especially large videos, to the
    computer by WiFi. Then I had to sort them, delete ones we didn’t like,
    rename them to something which makes sense.

    That's because you don't have iPhones and iCloud.

    If we had SD slots I could have just saved all my pictures to the card,
    handed her the card next to save all her pictures to it, copy them to the
    computer. Then arrange and rename them using a real keyboard and finally
    copy whatever we wanted back to the phones.

    That is WAY more complicated. And manual. Not automatic. The whole point of computers and networks is to AUTOMATE chores like this.

    Using an SD card to get the files on the computer and back to the phone
    would have been much easier and intuitive.

    That's funny. My wife and I combine photos all the time without using antique hardware. That's because we have modern hardware. We have iPhones and iPads.
    She texts me the photos or videos, I save them (using my iPhone or iPad). These ALL get automatically downloaded to my Windows PCs AND my Macs.

    Or I can text her MY photos, she saves them (using her iPhone or iPad) and they all get automatically downloaded to HER Windows PC.

    I'd use AirDrop instead. Way faster.

    Done.

    Why you want to fiddle around manually swapping antique cards is a mystery.

    Because: troll.

    But then, we live in the 21st century. You and Arlen are still stuck in 2005.

    They have to live in the past in order for their lame troll to work.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Jul 23 13:54:08 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-23 13:24, Marion wrote:
    On 23 Jul 2025 15:32:14 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    But then, we live in the 21st century.

    They have to live in the past in order for their lame troll to work.

    No iPhone on the planet can do what any Android phone with an sd card can.

    Like what?

    Do you think most people who buy smartphones even know what an SD card is?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Wed Jul 23 20:24:00 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 23 Jul 2025 15:32:14 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    But then, we live in the 21st century.

    They have to live in the past in order for their lame troll to work.

    No iPhone on the planet can do what any Android phone with an sd card can.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Jul 23 21:47:46 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 23, 2025 at 4:24:00 PM EDT, "Marion" <marion@facts.com> wrote:

    On 23 Jul 2025 15:32:14 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    But then, we live in the 21st century.

    They have to live in the past in order for their lame troll to work.

    No iPhone on the planet can do what any Android phone with an sd card can.

    Correct. iPhones do it faster, better and AUTOMATICALLY.

    But DO continue to live in 2005 and manually dick around with "memory cards".
    That's the only way this "point" works.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jul 23 23:08:02 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 23, 2025 at 1:30:34 AM EDT, "Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-07-22 21:55, Marion wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 03:14:09 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    Why is the iPhone always lacking in basic industry standard hardware
    functionality?

    It isn't. Because its not the year 2005.

    If 65% (and dropping) of Android phones have it, how is that an "industry >>> standard"?

    Fact: Most Android phones have sd card slots.
    Assessment: They don't put them there for no reason.

    Fact: Fewer and fewer Android phones have SD cards slots.

    2022: 598 Android phones: 398 with SD card slots (66.6%)
    2023: 497 Android phones: 308 with SD card slots (61.9%)
    2024: 562 Android phones: 329 with SD card slots (58.5%)

    Seeing a trend yet?

    Yes, of COURSE the SD card is trending down.

    Since Apple phones are more popular in the U.S. than Android phones (around 59%-41% right now), we can say that around 25% of phones in use in the U.S. have an SD slot.

    AGAIN, how is that an "industry standard"????

    The answer of COURSE is that it USED to be an "industry standard". So were floppy drives, spinning hard drives, CDs/DVDs and lots of other stuff.

    All are gone, and SD cards are rapidly going away.

    AGAIN, grow up Arlen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Jul 23 23:24:32 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-23, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On 23 Jul 2025 15:32:14 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

    But then, we live in the 21st century.

    They have to live in the past in order for their lame troll to work.

    No iPhone on the planet can do what any Android phone with an sd card can.

    FACT: No iPhone user needs an SD card. You're hopelessly stuck in the
    past, old fart. And your trolls are as weak as your intellect.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Jul 23 23:55:37 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 23, 2025 at 7:19:30 PM EDT, "Marion" <marion@facts.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 21:47:46 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    But then, we live in the 21st century.

    They have to live in the past in order for their lame troll to work.

    No iPhone on the planet can do what any Android phone with an sd card can. >>
    Correct. iPhones do it faster, better and AUTOMATICALLY.

    But DO continue to live in 2005 and manually dick around with "memory cards".
    That's the only way this "point" works.

    The question to ask is WHY did Apple take away your choice of hardware?

    Because I don't need it. That's yet ANOTHER REASON that I CHOOSE to buy iPhones.

    You are such a doofus. Removing slow, obsolete hardware is NOT "taking away a choice". Why don't phones come with "industry standard" 2400BPS modems? "Industry standard" cassette tape drives? "Industry standard" CRT screens?

    Only 25% (and dropping every year) of phones in the U.S. still have an SD
    slot. "Industry Standard" indeed. SD cards are legacy equipment at this
    point. They will be down to 10% in the U.S. in 5 years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Thu Jul 24 11:26:51 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-23 23:08:02 +0000, Tyrone said:

    On Jul 23, 2025 at 1:30:34 AM EDT, "Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-07-22 21:55, Marion wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 03:14:09 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    Why is the iPhone always lacking in basic industry standard hardware >>>>> functionality?

    It isn't. Because its not the year 2005.

    If 65% (and dropping) of Android phones have it, how is that an "industry >>>> standard"?

    Fact: Most Android phones have sd card slots.
    Assessment: They don't put them there for no reason.

    Fact: Fewer and fewer Android phones have SD cards slots.

    2022: 598 Android phones: 398 with SD card slots (66.6%)
    2023: 497 Android phones: 308 with SD card slots (61.9%)
    2024: 562 Android phones: 329 with SD card slots (58.5%)

    Seeing a trend yet?

    Yes, of COURSE the SD card is trending down.

    Since Apple phones are more popular in the U.S. than Android phones (around 59%-41% right now), we can say that around 25% of phones in use in the U.S. have an SD slot.

    AGAIN, how is that an "industry standard"????

    The answer of COURSE is that it USED to be an "industry standard". So were floppy drives, spinning hard drives, CDs/DVDs and lots of other stuff.

    All are gone, and SD cards are rapidly going away.

    AGAIN, grow up Arlen.

    Spinning hard drives still exist. Seagate and Western Digital both
    recently announced new 32TB drives, and have plans for bigger
    capacities in the next few years.

    Of course, these days very few new computers still ship with an
    internal spinning hard drive. The drives are mostly used as external
    storage (e.g. RAID boxes) and for server rooms (in-house and internet
    based).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Jul 23 16:25:49 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-23 16:19, Marion wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 21:47:46 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    But then, we live in the 21st century.

    They have to live in the past in order for their lame troll to work.

    No iPhone on the planet can do what any Android phone with an sd card can. >>
    Correct. iPhones do it faster, better and AUTOMATICALLY.

    But DO continue to live in 2005 and manually dick around with "memory cards".
    That's the only way this "point" works.

    The question to ask is WHY did Apple take away your choice of hardware?

    In order to charge less for the iPhone.


    Why does one of the most profitable companies on the planet sell to you a phone where you have to buy back the most basic of storage functionality?

    Put in blunt terms: *Apple _screwed_ you - for greed alone*.

    They don't sell anything that would LET you buy it back...

    ...so they have no greed motive.

    There are no advantages to you in not having an sd card.

    Lower cost, smaller form factor, (potentially) fewer ports to seal
    against water.

    Only disadvantages.

    All the advantages are in profit to Apple.
    Tim Cook laughs at you all the way to the bank.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Your Name on Wed Jul 23 23:59:34 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 23, 2025 at 7:26:51 PM EDT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    On 2025-07-23 23:08:02 +0000, Tyrone said:

    On Jul 23, 2025 at 1:30:34 AM EDT, "Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-07-22 21:55, Marion wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 03:14:09 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    Why is the iPhone always lacking in basic industry standard hardware >>>>>> functionality?

    It isn't. Because its not the year 2005.

    If 65% (and dropping) of Android phones have it, how is that an "industry >>>>> standard"?

    Fact: Most Android phones have sd card slots.
    Assessment: They don't put them there for no reason.

    Fact: Fewer and fewer Android phones have SD cards slots.

    2022: 598 Android phones: 398 with SD card slots (66.6%)
    2023: 497 Android phones: 308 with SD card slots (61.9%)
    2024: 562 Android phones: 329 with SD card slots (58.5%)

    Seeing a trend yet?

    Yes, of COURSE the SD card is trending down.

    Since Apple phones are more popular in the U.S. than Android phones (around >> 59%-41% right now), we can say that around 25% of phones in use in the U.S. >> have an SD slot.

    AGAIN, how is that an "industry standard"????

    The answer of COURSE is that it USED to be an "industry standard". So were >> floppy drives, spinning hard drives, CDs/DVDs and lots of other stuff.

    All are gone, and SD cards are rapidly going away.

    AGAIN, grow up Arlen.

    Spinning hard drives still exist. Seagate and Western Digital both
    recently announced new 32TB drives, and have plans for bigger
    capacities in the next few years.

    Yes, I know that. For servers and cloud storage.

    But they ARE gone from all consumer equipment. PCs, phones and tablets. Which is the topic here.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Wed Jul 23 23:19:30 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 21:47:46 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    But then, we live in the 21st century.

    They have to live in the past in order for their lame troll to work.

    No iPhone on the planet can do what any Android phone with an sd card can.

    Correct. iPhones do it faster, better and AUTOMATICALLY.

    But DO continue to live in 2005 and manually dick around with "memory cards".
    That's the only way this "point" works.

    The question to ask is WHY did Apple take away your choice of hardware?

    Why does one of the most profitable companies on the planet sell to you a
    phone where you have to buy back the most basic of storage functionality?

    Put in blunt terms: *Apple _screwed_ you - for greed alone*.

    There are no advantages to you in not having an sd card.
    Only disadvantages.

    All the advantages are in profit to Apple.
    Tim Cook laughs at you all the way to the bank.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Jul 24 00:25:49 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 23 Jul 2025 23:24:32 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    You're hopelessly stuck in the past, old fart.

    The fact remains the only way to make an iPhone work, is to buy back all
    that missing functionality - which is one reason Apple is so profitable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Thu Jul 24 00:28:19 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 23:55:37 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    The question to ask is WHY did Apple take away your choice of hardware?

    Because I don't need it. That's yet ANOTHER REASON that I CHOOSE to buy iPhones.

    Why do you think Apple is so profitable, Tyrone?

    You yourself just said you paid hundreds of dollars for functionality that
    you had to buy back that you claimed just now that you never even needed.

    HINT: If you bought more than 64GB storage, you paid hundreds too much.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Wed Jul 23 20:29:41 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 7/22/25 23:03, badgolferman wrote:
    Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    ...
    There are things a phone with a card in the sd slot can do that are
    impossible to do any other way - so I agree it's a critically important
    basic hardware feature if you want to make the most of your phone.

    My last smartphone with an SD card slot was back in ... (Googling phone
    models) 2012. Not having it just hasn't been an issue.


    Having an SD slot would be very useful. Last month when my wife and I went
    on vacation to California, it was a chore trying to combine all the videos and pictures from both our phones into one picture folder on the computer.

    The process of plugging a phone in is just as straightforward as
    plugging an SD card into a slot on the PC ... except that one doesn't
    have to disassemble the phone first to get to the media card.



    I had to play around with several apps and/or local network connections to transfer all the files from both phones, especially large videos, to the computer by WiFi. Then I had to sort them, delete ones we didn’t like, rename them to something which makes sense.

    Maybe get a Mac? For small/quick/easy transfers, I just use Airdrop.



    If we had SD slots I could have just saved all my pictures to the card, handed her the card next to save all her pictures to it, copy them to the computer.


    Wouldn't it be easier for you to each have your own SD card, rather than
    have to do a media dance? A basic 64GB card for a phone is like $10.
    Ditto for microSD.


    Then arrange and rename them using a real keyboard and finally
    copy whatever we wanted back to the phones.

    Sounds like you need better syncing software; MacOS+iOS do fine here.

    Using an SD card to get the files on the computer and back to the phone
    would have been much easier and intuitive.

    Its even easier if you put the SD card in a device which can transmit
    the images wirelessly...you know, like Bluetooth on an iPhone /s


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Jul 24 00:30:47 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On 23 Jul 2025 23:24:32 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

    You're hopelessly stuck in the past, old fart.

    The fact remains the only way to make an iPhone work, is to buy back all
    that missing functionality - which is one reason Apple is so profitable.

    That's not a fact, dip shit. Your trolls are weak.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Jul 24 00:32:05 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 23:55:37 +0000, Tyrone wrote :

    The question to ask is WHY did Apple take away your choice of hardware?

    Because I don't need it. That's yet ANOTHER REASON that I CHOOSE to buy
    iPhones.

    Why do you think Apple is so profitable, Tyrone?

    Because people love their products. And you *HATE* that so much you
    literally spend all day every day trolling the Apple newsgroups., like
    the complete loser you are.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to -hh on Thu Jul 24 00:33:32 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 20:29:41 -0400, -hh wrote :


    There are things a phone with a card in the sd slot can do that are
    impossible to do any other way - so I agree it's a critically important
    basic hardware feature if you want to make the most of your phone.

    My last smartphone with an SD card slot was back in ... (Googling phone models) 2012. Not having it just hasn't been an issue.

    Apple is brilliant by making you pay hundreds of dollars to buy basic functionality back that Apple saved money simply by not providing it.

    And you bought it back.

    Having an SD slot would be very useful. Last month when my wife and I went >> on vacation to California, it was a chore trying to combine all the videos >> and pictures from both our phones into one picture folder on the computer.

    The process of plugging a phone in is just as straightforward as
    plugging an SD card into a slot on the PC ... except that one doesn't
    have to disassemble the phone first to get to the media card.

    The point is to explain a key strategic reason why Apple is so profitable.
    It's brilliant how they remove basic functionality so you must buy it back.

    And you did.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Jul 24 00:34:14 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 24 Jul 2025 00:32:05 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    Why do you think Apple is so profitable, Tyrone?

    Because people love their products.

    The point is to explain a key strategic reason why Apple is so profitable.
    It's brilliant how they remove basic functionality so you must buy it back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Jul 24 01:13:31 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 23, 2025 at 8:28:19 PM EDT, "Marion" <marion@facts.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 23:55:37 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    The question to ask is WHY did Apple take away your choice of hardware?

    Because I don't need it. That's yet ANOTHER REASON that I CHOOSE to buy
    iPhones.

    Why do you think Apple is so profitable, Tyrone?

    Because they have fantastic products. No junk, which accounts for 3/4 of Android phones.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Thu Jul 24 00:24:35 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 23:59:34 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    But they ARE gone from all consumer equipment. PCs, phones and tablets.
    Which is the topic here.

    One of the reasons Apple is so profitable is the iPhone lacks basic functionality which, of course, you paid a lot of money to get back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Jul 23 18:18:10 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-23 17:24, Marion wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 23:59:34 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    But they ARE gone from all consumer equipment. PCs, phones and tablets.
    Which is the topic here.

    One of the reasons Apple is so profitable is the iPhone lacks basic functionality which, of course, you paid a lot of money to get back.

    How, exactly?

    What does APPLE sell you to replace the functionality of an SD card?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to -hh on Thu Jul 24 13:35:54 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24 00:29:41 +0000, -hh said:

    On 7/22/25 23:03, badgolferman wrote:
    Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    ...
    There are things a phone with a card in the sd slot can do that are
    impossible to do any other way - so I agree it's a critically important
    basic hardware feature if you want to make the most of your phone.

    My last smartphone with an SD card slot was back in ... (Googling phone models) 2012. Not having it just hasn't been an issue.


    Having an SD slot would be very useful. Last month when my wife and I went >> on vacation to California, it was a chore trying to combine all the videos >> and pictures from both our phones into one picture folder on the computer.

    The process of plugging a phone in is just as straightforward as
    plugging an SD card into a slot on the PC ... except that one doesn't
    have to disassemble the phone first to get to the media card.

    Whether or not there is an SD card slot, it's has always been far
    easier to simply plug the phone into a computer to transfer files or
    these days just use an external drive to store stuff. SD cards were
    always a useless, fiddly option and far too easily lost.



    I had to play around with several apps and/or local network connections to >> transfer all the files from both phones, especially large videos, to the
    computer by WiFi. Then I had to sort them, delete ones we didn’t like,
    rename them to something which makes sense.

    Maybe get a Mac? For small/quick/easy transfers, I just use Airdrop.



    If we had SD slots I could have just saved all my pictures to the card,
    handed her the card next to save all her pictures to it, copy them to the
    computer.

    Wouldn't it be easier for you to each have your own SD card, rather
    than have to do a media dance? A basic 64GB card for a phone is like
    $10.
    Ditto for microSD.


    Then arrange and rename them using a real keyboard and finally
    copy whatever we wanted back to the phones.

    Sounds like you need better syncing software; MacOS+iOS do fine here.

    Using an SD card to get the files on the computer and back to the phone
    would have been much easier and intuitive.

    Its even easier if you put the SD card in a device which can transmit
    the images wirelessly...you know, like Bluetooth on an iPhone /s


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Thu Jul 24 13:43:07 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-23 23:59:34 +0000, Tyrone said:
    On Jul 23, 2025 at 7:26:51 PM EDT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    On 2025-07-23 23:08:02 +0000, Tyrone said:
    On Jul 23, 2025 at 1:30:34 AM EDT, "Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2025-07-22 21:55, Marion wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 03:14:09 +0000, Tyrone wrote :

    Why is the iPhone always lacking in basic industry standard hardware >>>>>>> functionality?

    It isn't. Because its not the year 2005.

    If 65% (and dropping) of Android phones have it, how is that an
    "industry standard"?

    Fact: Most Android phones have sd card slots.
    Assessment: They don't put them there for no reason.

    Fact: Fewer and fewer Android phones have SD cards slots.

    2022: 598 Android phones: 398 with SD card slots (66.6%)
    2023: 497 Android phones: 308 with SD card slots (61.9%)
    2024: 562 Android phones: 329 with SD card slots (58.5%)

    Seeing a trend yet?

    Yes, of COURSE the SD card is trending down.

    Since Apple phones are more popular in the U.S. than Android phones
    (around 59%-41% right now), we can say that around 25% of phones in use
    in the U.S. have an SD slot.

    AGAIN, how is that an "industry standard"????

    The answer of COURSE is that it USED to be an "industry standard". So
    were floppy drives, spinning hard drives, CDs/DVDs and lots of other
    stuff.

    All are gone, and SD cards are rapidly going away.

    AGAIN, grow up Arlen.

    Spinning hard drives still exist. Seagate and Western Digital both
    recently announced new 32TB drives, and have plans for bigger
    capacities in the next few years.

    Yes, I know that. For servers and cloud storage.

    But they ARE gone from all consumer equipment. PCs, phones and tablets. Which is the topic here.

    Inside the devices, yes, as I posted, but you snipped, but regular
    consumers can still go to the nearest tech store and buy an external
    hard disk drives. Disk drives are far more 'bang for your buck' than
    SSDs will be for a long time yet (hard drives cost around 3c-6c per GB
    while SSDs cost 8-10c per GB, so SSDs cost around twice as much for the
    same capacity).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Thu Jul 24 13:46:57 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-23 23:55:37 +0000, Tyrone said:
    On Jul 23, 2025 at 7:19:30 PM EDT, "Marion" <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 21:47:46 +0000, Tyrone wrote :
    But then, we live in the 21st century.

    They have to live in the past in order for their lame troll to work.

    No iPhone on the planet can do what any Android phone with an sd card can. >>>
    Correct. iPhones do it faster, better and AUTOMATICALLY.

    But DO continue to live in 2005 and manually dick around with "memory
    cards". That's the only way this "point" works.

    The question to ask is WHY did Apple take away your choice of hardware?

    Because I don't need it. That's yet ANOTHER REASON that I CHOOSE to buy iPhones.

    You are such a doofus. Removing slow, obsolete hardware is NOT "taking away a choice". Why don't phones come with "industry standard" 2400BPS modems? "Industry standard" cassette tape drives? "Industry standard" CRT screens?

    Only 25% (and dropping every year) of phones in the U.S. still have an SD slot. "Industry Standard" indeed. SD cards are legacy equipment at this point. They will be down to 10% in the U.S. in 5 years.

    Even of those 25% of US phones with an SD card slot, you'd be lucky if
    2% of owners actually use SD cards (other than when buying the phone
    being talked into an expensive addition by a salesdroid out for more
    sales commision, and even then it's put into the slot and forgotten
    about).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Jul 24 14:10:23 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On 24 Jul 2025 00:32:05 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

    Why do you think Apple is so profitable, Tyrone?

    Because people love their products.

    The point is

    Your only point is to troll. And your trolls are weak.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Jul 24 14:09:33 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On 24 Jul 2025 00:30:47 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

    The fact remains the only way to make an iPhone work, is to buy back
    all that missing functionality - which is one reason Apple is so
    profitable.

    That's not a fact

    Apple is brilliant by making you pay hundreds of dollars to buy basic functionality back that Apple saved money simply by not providing it.

    Also not a fact, dip shit. Your trolls are weak.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Jul 24 15:09:31 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 24 Jul 2025 14:09:33 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    Apple is brilliant by making you pay hundreds of dollars to buy basic
    functionality back that Apple saved money simply by not providing it.

    Also not a fact

    You paid hundreds of dollars for storage over the necessary 64GB.
    No phone with an sd card needs more than that as sd adds a terabyte.

    One reason Apple is so profitable is you buy back basic functionality.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Your Name on Thu Jul 24 15:10:21 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:35:54 +1200, Your Name wrote :


    The process of plugging a phone in is just as straightforward as
    plugging an SD card into a slot on the PC ... except that one doesn't
    have to disassemble the phone first to get to the media card.

    Whether or not there is an SD card slot, it's has always been far
    easier to simply plug the phone into a computer to transfer files or
    these days just use an external drive to store stuff. SD cards were
    always a useless, fiddly option and far too easily lost.

    You're simply proving that the iPhone always lacks basic functionality.
    How easy is it to add a terabyte of additional storage to an iPhone?

    Apple's genius strategy is to force you to buy back basic functionality.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Your Name on Thu Jul 24 15:07:54 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:43:07 +1200, Your Name wrote :


    But they ARE gone from all consumer equipment. PCs, phones and tablets. Which
    is the topic here.

    Inside the devices, yes, as I posted, but you snipped, but regular
    consumers can still go to the nearest tech store and buy an external
    hard disk drives. Disk drives are far more 'bang for your buck' than
    SSDs will be for a long time yet (hard drives cost around 3c-6c per GB
    while SSDs cost 8-10c per GB, so SSDs cost around twice as much for the
    same capacity).

    The absurdity of this suggestion to 'glue' an entire hard disk drive
    ATTACHED to your iPhone everywhere you go simply proves the point here.

    The Apple iPhone always has been lacking basic standard functionality.
    It's part of Apple's strategic genius to force the customer to buy it back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Thu Jul 24 15:59:11 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 01:13:31 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    Why do you think Apple is so profitable, Tyrone?

    Because they have fantastic products.

    The rather profitable strategic genius of Apple is that you are forced to purchase back at grossly inflated prices all that missing functionality.

    No junk, which accounts for 3/4 of Android phones.

    Only in rich countries can people afford the Apple profit-making stratagem
    of removing functionality so people have to pay hundreds to get it back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Your Name on Thu Jul 24 15:58:37 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:46:57 +1200, Your Name wrote :


    Only 25% (and dropping every year) of phones in the U.S. still have an SD
    slot. "Industry Standard" indeed. SD cards are legacy equipment at this
    point. They will be down to 10% in the U.S. in 5 years.

    Even of those 25% of US phones with an SD card slot, you'd be lucky if
    2% of owners actually use SD cards (other than when buying the phone
    being talked into an expensive addition by a salesdroid out for more
    sales commision, and even then it's put into the slot and forgotten
    about).

    It's interesting you feel a $20 sd card is an "expensive addition"
    when you unnecessarily paid $100s for the same amount of iPhone storage.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Jul 24 16:00:14 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 24 Jul 2025 14:10:23 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    Your only point is

    My point is to teach you that Apple is brilliant in forcing innocent people like you are to buy back missing functionality at grossly inflated prices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Jul 24 13:34:07 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 7/24/25 11:07, Marion wrote:
    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:43:07 +1200, Your Name wrote :


    But they ARE gone from all consumer equipment. PCs, phones and tablets. Which
    is the topic here.

    Inside the devices, yes, as I posted, but you snipped, but regular
    consumers can still go to the nearest tech store and buy an external
    hard disk drives. Disk drives are far more 'bang for your buck' than
    SSDs will be for a long time yet (hard drives cost around 3c-6c per GB
    while SSDs cost 8-10c per GB, so SSDs cost around twice as much for the
    same capacity).

    The absurdity of this suggestion to 'glue' an entire hard disk drive
    ATTACHED to your iPhone everywhere you go simply proves the point here.


    Nah, what's absurd is the belief that one's capability needs are to have veritable terabytes of data on a smartphone.

    Case in point, what's the largest capacity Android phone sold today?

    In searching, i found that Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has 1TB, which is
    the same as what Apple's offered on their Pro Max iPhones since the 13.

    State of the shelf hard drives are 12TB+ these days, so why are even
    Android smartphones more than a full order of magnitude behind?


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Your Name on Thu Jul 24 13:27:15 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 7/23/25 21:35, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-07-24 00:29:41 +0000, -hh said:

    On 7/22/25 23:03, badgolferman wrote:
    Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    ...
    There are things a phone with a card in the sd slot can do that are
    impossible to do any other way - so I agree it's a critically important >>>> basic hardware feature if you want to make the most of your phone.

    My last smartphone with an SD card slot was back in ... (Googling
    phone models) 2012.  Not having it just hasn't been an issue.


    Having an SD slot would be very useful. Last month when my wife and I
    went
    on vacation to California, it was a chore trying to combine all the
    videos
    and pictures from both our phones into one picture folder on the
    computer.

    The process of plugging a phone in is just as straightforward as
    plugging an SD card into a slot on the PC ... except that one doesn't
    have to disassemble the phone first to get to the media card.

    Whether or not there is an SD card slot, it's has always been far easier
    to simply plug the phone into a computer to transfer files or these days
    just use an external drive to store stuff. SD cards were always a
    useless, fiddly option and far too easily lost.
    Particularly since on mobile phones, they weren't the full sized SD
    cards, but the "micro-SD" form factor, which is half the size of a
    pinky's fingernail.

    (FYI for completeness, there was also mini-SD, but last time I actively checked, their capacity was limited to just 2GB, so obsolete today.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Jul 24 19:32:36 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On 24 Jul 2025 14:09:33 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

    Apple is brilliant by making you pay hundreds of dollars to buy basic
    functionality back that Apple saved money simply by not providing it.

    Also not a fact

    You paid blah blah blah

    Pushing more weak trolls isn't going to help you, old fart.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Your Name on Thu Jul 24 15:20:13 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 7/23/25 21:46, Your Name wrote:
    ...
    Even of those 25% of US phones with an SD card slot, you'd be lucky if
    2% of owners actually use SD cards (other than when buying the phone
    being talked into an expensive addition by a salesdroid out for more
    sales commision, and even then it's put into the slot and forgotten about).


    A good point, since memory cards in brick-n-mortar stores are quite
    frequently grossly overpriced, so they're a profit center. Its gotten
    less bad, but I've seen cheap Class 10 rated cards on the shelf listed
    at V90 rating card prices, which was a hefty markup.

    Which brings us to another element of differentiation present: the bus interface for a physical SD card has its own protocol and can be a
    bottleneck even if one has bought a fast SD card: said protocols can be
    as slow as SD's default of 12.5 MB/sec, and even for SDHC's UHS-I, its
    maximum is just 104 MB/sec.

    In contrast, the iPhone's integral storage is on NvME with 3-4GB/sec
    reads & 2-3GB/sec writes.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Jul 24 19:34:02 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On 24 Jul 2025 14:10:23 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

    Your only point is

    My point is to teach you

    Says the clown who claimed it was impossible for iOS devices to run SMB servers, doubling down when you were easily proved wrong. 🤣 You're in
    no position to tech anyone anything about Apple.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to -hh on Thu Jul 24 13:05:12 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24 12:20, -hh wrote:
    On 7/23/25 21:46, Your Name wrote:
    ...
    Even of those 25% of US phones with an SD card slot, you'd be lucky if
    2% of owners actually use SD cards (other than when buying the phone
    being talked into an expensive addition by a salesdroid out for more
    sales commision, and even then it's put into the slot and forgotten
    about).


    A good point, since memory cards in brick-n-mortar stores are quite frequently grossly overpriced, so they're a profit center.  Its gotten
    less bad, but I've seen cheap Class 10 rated cards on the shelf listed
    at V90 rating card prices, which was a hefty markup.

    Which brings us to another element of differentiation present:  the bus interface for a physical SD card has its own protocol and can be a
    bottleneck even if one has bought a fast SD card:  said protocols can be
    as slow as SD's default of 12.5 MB/sec, and even for SDHC's UHS-I, its maximum is just 104 MB/sec.

    In contrast, the iPhone's integral storage is on NvME with 3-4GB/sec
    reads & 2-3GB/sec writes.
    A very good point.

    I can't imagine why the "man who only posts facts" missed that.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to -hh on Fri Jul 25 08:48:59 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24 17:34:07 +0000, -hh said:
    On 7/24/25 11:07, Marion wrote:
    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:43:07 +1200, Your Name wrote :

    But they ARE gone from all consumer equipment. PCs, phones and tablets. >>>> Which is the topic here.

    Inside the devices, yes, as I posted, but you snipped, but regular
    consumers can still go to the nearest tech store and buy an external
    hard disk drives. Disk drives are far more 'bang for your buck' than
    SSDs will be for a long time yet (hard drives cost around 3c-6c per GB
    while SSDs cost 8-10c per GB, so SSDs cost around twice as much for the
    same capacity).

    The absurdity of this suggestion to 'glue' an entire hard disk drive
    ATTACHED to your iPhone everywhere you go simply proves the point here.

    Nah, what's absurd is the belief that one's capability needs are to
    have veritable terabytes of data on a smartphone.

    What's really absurd is the braindead troll "Marion" who thinks mobile
    phones ever had hard drives (or a normal SSD for that matter) ...
    especially when the moronic troll itself crossposted this topic to a
    *Mac* newsgroup.



    Case in point, what's the largest capacity Android phone sold today?

    In searching, i found that Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has 1TB, which is
    the same as what Apple's offered on their Pro Max iPhones since the 13.

    State of the shelf hard drives are 12TB+ these days, so why are even
    Android smartphones more than a full order of magnitude behind?


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to -hh on Thu Jul 24 21:21:39 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:34:07 -0400, -hh wrote :


    Nah, what's absurd is the belief that one's capability needs are to have veritable terabytes of data on a smartphone.

    Case in point, what's the largest capacity Android phone sold today?

    In searching, i found that Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has 1TB, which is
    the same as what Apple's offered on their Pro Max iPhones since the 13.

    I do agree that most of us don't need to carry a terabyte attached to the device, but the point also is nobody needs more than 64GB internal storage.

    So everything above 64GB of internal storage is a gross misuse of money (assuming the phone had an sd slot which is usually multiples of that).

    My main point is to teach you that Apple's fundamental strategy on hardware capability is to limit what the iPhone can do so you have to buy it back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Jul 24 21:21:52 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 24 Jul 2025 19:32:36 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    Pushing more

    I'm really trying to teach you what Apple's strategy is, Jolly Roger.
    You should appreciate that I understand Apple far better than you do.

    Apple's profit-making strategy is to limit the functionality of the iPhone
    so that you're forced to buy it back at grossly criminally inflated prices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to -hh on Thu Jul 24 21:22:00 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 15:20:13 -0400, -hh wrote :


    In contrast, the iPhone's integral storage is on NvME with 3-4GB/sec
    reads & 2-3GB/sec writes.

    How much did it cost you to purchase an iPhone with more than 64GB storage?

    The rather profitable strategic genius of Apple is that you are forced to purchase back at grossly inflated prices all that missing functionality.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Thu Jul 24 21:21:16 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:32:18 -0400, badgolferman wrote :


    On 07/24/2025 11:10, Marion wrote:
    Apple's genius strategy is to force you to buy back basic functionality.

    You know I'm not an Apple apologist despite owning iPhones. While I do
    agree with your statement, I'm not sure it really matters to the high
    end phone customer. Obviously Apple, Samsung, Google, and whoever else
    makes high end phones have removed all the basic functionality you have listed over the years. They are all guilty of nickel and diming the customer.

    Hi badgolferman,

    My main goal, on this ng, is to teach people what Apple's strategy is.
    You don't need that lesson - but the MAGA trolls definitely need it.

    I also own iPhones and iPads, and I'm not an Apple apologist either.
    I own Android & Windows too - and I'm no apologist for Google/M$ either.

    I simply study each of them to better understand their strategy.
    And I find Apple's strategies, although deceitful - rather brilliant.

    What happened, as far as I can tell, is Apple *started* this movement of reducing hardware functionality in most (not all) hardware functions.

    a. Apple spearheaded the trend toward sealed batteries in 2007
    b. Apple started the trend of lack of portable storage at the same time
    c. Apple removed the aux jack in the iPhone 7 in 2016
    d. Apple lied about why they removed the 2020 iPhone 12 charger
    e. No iPhone had more than 4GB of RAM until the iPhone 12 Pro in 2020
    f. Even the 2025 iPhone 16 Pro Max has a laughable 4,685mAh battery

    The iPhone is so deficient in hardware capability that no iPhone older than
    the iPhone 15 would be allowed to be sold in the EU today, it's that bad.

    Now, to your point though, which I agree with since I never disagree with a sensible viewpoint. Sure. In the USA, people have tons of money to spend.

    So if you don't get a charger, you can buy the right charger.
    If the phone dies in a short time due to the battery, you replace it.
    If there's no sd hardware - you pay through the nose for internal storage.

    What's paying double the price of an iPhone when you have lots of money.
    So I do agree with you.

    But... my point is this lack of functionality what has to be bought back is hugely where Apple's profits come from.

    The MAGA trolls don't understand Apple's profit-making strategy.
    You do. I do. But they don't.

    I'm teaching them.
    Well... I know... they can't be taught some say...

    But I think the MAGA herd-animal Apple religious trolls "can" be taught.
    Don't you?

    BTW, the deplorable RAM in the iPhone Apple was forced to fix on their own because they couldn't run AI on the phone with their crappy iPhone RAM.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Jul 24 21:22:05 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 24 Jul 2025 19:34:02 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    You're in no position to tech anyone anything about Apple.

    Well, maybe you could spend a moment to learn what Apple did to you.

    Apple fucked you up the ass by their lack of basic hardware functionality.
    And you don't even realize it because you paid a lot to buy it all back.

    Apple's profits are from people like you who don't understand strategy.
    Lucky you that I'm here to teach you all about what Apple's strategy is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Jul 24 14:48:51 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24 14:21, Marion wrote:
    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:34:07 -0400, -hh wrote :


    Nah, what's absurd is the belief that one's capability needs are to have
    veritable terabytes of data on a smartphone.

    Case in point, what's the largest capacity Android phone sold today?

    In searching, i found that Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has 1TB, which is
    the same as what Apple's offered on their Pro Max iPhones since the 13.

    I do agree that most of us don't need to carry a terabyte attached to the device, but the point also is nobody needs more than 64GB internal storage.

    Yet somehow, I find my phone has 120.09GB of data on it.


    So everything above 64GB of internal storage is a gross misuse of money (assuming the phone had an sd slot which is usually multiples of that).

    My main point is to teach you that Apple's fundamental strategy on hardware capability is to limit what the iPhone can do so you have to buy it back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Jul 24 14:47:57 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24 14:21, Marion wrote:
    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:32:18 -0400, badgolferman wrote :


    On 07/24/2025 11:10, Marion wrote:
    Apple's genius strategy is to force you to buy back basic functionality.

    You know I'm not an Apple apologist despite owning iPhones. While I do
    agree with your statement, I'm not sure it really matters to the high
    end phone customer. Obviously Apple, Samsung, Google, and whoever else
    makes high end phones have removed all the basic functionality you have
    listed over the years. They are all guilty of nickel and diming the
    customer.

    Hi badgolferman,

    My main goal, on this ng, is to teach people what Apple's strategy is.
    You don't need that lesson - but the MAGA trolls definitely need it.

    I also own iPhones and iPads, and I'm not an Apple apologist either.
    I own Android & Windows too - and I'm no apologist for Google/M$ either.

    I simply study each of them to better understand their strategy.
    And I find Apple's strategies, although deceitful - rather brilliant.

    What happened, as far as I can tell, is Apple *started* this movement of reducing hardware functionality in most (not all) hardware functions.

    a. Apple spearheaded the trend toward sealed batteries in 2007

    True. So what?

    Did Apple force people to buy them?

    b. Apple started the trend of lack of portable storage at the same time

    Same question.

    c. Apple removed the aux jack in the iPhone 7 in 2016

    Same question.

    d. Apple lied about why they removed the 2020 iPhone 12 charger

    That's something you're presenting as fact when you don't know if it's
    true or not.

    In short, you're lying.

    e. No iPhone had more than 4GB of RAM until the iPhone 12 Pro in 2020

    Back to the original question.

    f. Even the 2025 iPhone 16 Pro Max has a laughable 4,685mAh battery

    Yet has a runtime greater than all but 6 other smartphones...

    <https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>


    The iPhone is so deficient in hardware capability that no iPhone older than the iPhone 15 would be allowed to be sold in the EU today, it's that bad.

    That's another assertion being presented as fact.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Your Name on Thu Jul 24 23:29:24 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 23, 2025 at 9:43:07 PM EDT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    Inside the devices, yes, as I posted, but you snipped, but regular
    consumers can still go to the nearest tech store and buy an external
    hard disk drives. Disk drives are far more 'bang for your buck' than
    SSDs will be for a long time yet (hard drives cost around 3c-6c per GB
    while SSDs cost 8-10c per GB, so SSDs cost around twice as much for the
    same capacity).

    And spinning hard drives are also slower, heavier and use more power. I only use them for backups. Not for daily use.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Thu Jul 24 19:54:20 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24 19:24, badgolferman wrote:
    On 07/24/2025 17:21, Marion wrote:
    But I think the MAGA herd-animal Apple religious trolls "can" be taught.
    Don't you?

    Unfortunately I don't think there are too many people on the entirety of Usenet who "can" be taught anything.  It seems arguing ad nauseam is the prevailing activity now.

    Do you think Arlen will get that?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Fri Jul 25 18:16:47 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24 23:29:24 +0000, Tyrone said:
    On Jul 23, 2025 at 9:43:07 PM EDT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    Inside the devices, yes, as I posted, but you snipped, but regular
    consumers can still go to the nearest tech store and buy an external
    hard disk drives. Disk drives are far more 'bang for your buck' than
    SSDs will be for a long time yet (hard drives cost around 3c-6c per GB
    while SSDs cost 8-10c per GB, so SSDs cost around twice as much for the
    same capacity).

    And spinning hard drives are also slower, heavier and use more power. I only use them for backups. Not for daily use.

    True, although "slower" is really just a matter if personal patience
    levels for most people. I have zero problems waiting an extra second or
    two while saving half the price (roughly) for the same capactiy. :-)

    Power isn't too much of an issue. The small portable hard drives are
    usually USB powered, so there is no power brick to worry about. They
    also aren't that heavy and could be easily carried around.

    Of course, if you want truly light, portable, and low-powered, you
    would go with USB stick drives instead, but they are mostly
    lower-capacity in comparison.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Fri Jul 25 08:32:56 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:24:07 -0400, badgolferman wrote :


    On 07/24/2025 17:21, Marion wrote:
    But I think the MAGA herd-animal Apple religious trolls "can" be taught.
    Don't you?

    Unfortunately I don't think there are too many people on the entirety of Usenet who "can" be taught anything. It seems arguing ad nauseam is the prevailing activity now.

    While this is likely true, particularly of the MAGA trolls like Alan Baker
    who participate in conversations and then forget them just days later...

    Jolly Roger, Your Name, NY, Chris, -hh, Haemactylus, Tyrone, et al.
    All these MAGA trolls need to learn what Apple has been doing to them.

    I think overall MAGA trolls can't avoid the fact that Apple's deceit shows
    they are one of the most duplicitous companies in the United States.
    <https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2020/03/apple-settles-with-french-authorities-over-25-mill>

    (Short of big tobacco, who is even worse than Apple on their brazen lies.)

    Apple brazenly lied about batterygate for example, and got away with it. (Resulting monetary costs totaled well over a billion dollars though.)

    The MAGA trolls claim Apple can afford to brazenly criminally lie to all;
    but I assess that eventually even the MAGA trolls can learn about Apple.

    It used to be that Apple only lied outside of court, where, for example,
    Apple has been lying about "efficiency" for years (yet, it was all a lie).

    Now it seems Apple even deceitfully lies in court, they're that horrid.
    <https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/game-over-for-apple-tax-says-epic-ceo-after-app-store-ruling/articleshow/120787261.cms>

    Apple's brazen greenwashing lies will come to bite them as they're obvious.
    <https://trellis.net/article/apple-lawsuit-highlights-the-perils-of-making-carbon-neutral-claims/>

    Very few companies are as profitable & deceitful as Apple is where those profits are due mainly to Apple's brazen lies to the hapless consumer.

    Apple even recently lied disparaging the EU benchmarks where only Apple couldn't earn an A in efficiency - almost everyone else but Apple did.

    The innocent MAGA herd-animal zealots think Apple's profits are due to
    product, but what they don't realize is they're being lied to by Apple.

    Apple's profits are a direct function of Apple's brazen public lies.
    The product is barely functional (it doesn't even have basic hardware).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Your Name on Fri Jul 25 08:32:44 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 18:16:47 +1200, Your Name wrote :


    On 2025-07-24 23:29:24 +0000, Tyrone said:
    On Jul 23, 2025 at 9:43:07 PM EDT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    Inside the devices, yes, as I posted, but you snipped, but regular
    consumers can still go to the nearest tech store and buy an external
    hard disk drives. Disk drives are far more 'bang for your buck' than
    SSDs will be for a long time yet (hard drives cost around 3c-6c per GB
    while SSDs cost 8-10c per GB, so SSDs cost around twice as much for the
    same capacity).

    And spinning hard drives are also slower, heavier and use more power. I only >> use them for backups. Not for daily use.

    True, although "slower" is really just a matter if personal patience
    levels for most people. I have zero problems waiting an extra second or
    two while saving half the price (roughly) for the same capactiy. :-)

    Power isn't too much of an issue. The small portable hard drives are
    usually USB powered, so there is no power brick to worry about. They
    also aren't that heavy and could be easily carried around.

    Of course, if you want truly light, portable, and low-powered, you
    would go with USB stick drives instead, but they are mostly
    lower-capacity in comparison.

    The problem with the iPhone lacking any semblance of basic functionality is that you have to be rich to be able to do anything useful with the iPhone.

    The iPhone is so unusable out of the box that you have to literally spend hundreds of dollars just to start to get the damn thing to start working.

    It's no longer shocking that the MAGA trolls go to great length to justify
    the obvious fact that the iPhone lacks even the most basic of hardware.

    No iPhone ever sold prior to the iPhone 15 is legal to sell new in the EU
    due to the paucity of the hardware that is inherent in brain dead iPhones.

    The iPhone lack industry standard hardware such as sd slot & aux jacks.
    The iPhone paltry RAM and iPhone garbage batteries are a laughing stock.
    The lack of a proper charger shows Apple fucks their customer left & right.

    Worse, the apps on the phone, if you don't create an Apple Account, will eventually all die over time if you update the operating system.

    Even if you add that horrifically restrictive privacy-robbing Apple ID,
    you're still stuck with a brain-dead device that is merely a dumb terminal.

    The device can't do anything useful without ANOTHER device you own next to
    it for the rest of your life (as you have to prove who you are to Apple).

    Even after carrying around TWO DEVICES everywhere you go (or proving to
    Apple by other means who you actually are) it's STILL brain dead in that it can't do half the things that every non-Apple phone easily does.

    What bothers me isn't so much that the iPhone is a dysfunctional piece of
    junk but that Apple successfully lies to people saying that it's not.

    And yet - it is.

    There are few companies as deceitful as Apple is (where it used to be that Apple only told the truth in court but they've broken that stricture).

    And few as profitable.
    As a direct result of Apple's brazen lies.

    My issue is that people are dumb enough to *believe* those lies.
    So my goal is to ensure nobody on this newsgroup is that ignorant.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 25 07:00:45 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 7/24/25 17:22, Marion wrote:
    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 15:20:13 -0400, -hh wrote :


    In contrast, the iPhone's integral storage is on NvME with 3-4GB/sec
    reads & 2-3GB/sec writes.

    How much did it cost you to purchase an iPhone with more than 64GB storage?

    Since I have receipts & I have a history of being able to substantiate
    may claims, you need to go first: set the benchmark for what is the
    "correct" amount to pay.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 25 06:51:34 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 7/24/25 17:21, Marion wrote:
    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:34:07 -0400, -hh wrote :


    Nah, what's absurd is the belief that one's capability needs are to have
    veritable terabytes of data on a smartphone.

    Case in point, what's the largest capacity Android phone sold today?

    In searching, i found that Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has 1TB, which is
    the same as what Apple's offered on their Pro Max iPhones since the 13.

    I do agree that most of us don't need to carry a terabyte attached to the device, but the point also is nobody needs more than 64GB internal storage.

    Didn't Bill Gates say something about no one needing more than 640K? /s


    So everything above 64GB of internal storage is a gross misuse of money (assuming the phone had an sd slot which is usually multiples of that).

    That's for the consumer to decide. Not you, not Bill Gates.


    My main point is to teach you that Apple's fundamental strategy on hardware capability is to limit what the iPhone can do so you have to buy it back.

    Meantime, SD cards are sold in different sizes+speeds, with each having
    its own price point; more = higher price: so where's any difference?


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 25 14:37:00 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-24, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On 24 Jul 2025 19:34:02 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

    You're in no position to tech anyone anything about Apple.

    Well, maybe you could

    You were adamant that iPhones supposedly couldn't run SMB servers, and
    after multiple people (including me) easily proved you WRONG, you
    doubled down and continued to lie, because: troll. You know next to
    nothing about basic networking, and even less about Apple products.
    You're a fucking moron, trollboi. Revel in your stupidity. It's all
    you've got.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to -hh on Fri Jul 25 16:20:05 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote at 10:51 this Friday (GMT):
    On 7/24/25 17:21, Marion wrote:
    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:34:07 -0400, -hh wrote :


    Nah, what's absurd is the belief that one's capability needs are to have >>> veritable terabytes of data on a smartphone.

    Case in point, what's the largest capacity Android phone sold today?

    In searching, i found that Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has 1TB, which is
    the same as what Apple's offered on their Pro Max iPhones since the 13.

    I do agree that most of us don't need to carry a terabyte attached to the
    device, but the point also is nobody needs more than 64GB internal storage.

    Didn't Bill Gates say something about no one needing more than 640K? /s

    That's also why having external storage is nice (as long as the os can
    read it)

    So everything above 64GB of internal storage is a gross misuse of money
    (assuming the phone had an sd slot which is usually multiples of that).

    That's for the consumer to decide. Not you, not Bill Gates.

    I personally use some 150gb on my phone, but thats from 5+ years of
    photos and also downloading videos for VLC.

    My main point is to teach you that Apple's fundamental strategy on hardware >> capability is to limit what the iPhone can do so you have to buy it back.

    Meantime, SD cards are sold in different sizes+speeds, with each having
    its own price point; more = higher price: so where's any difference?


    -hh


    Presumably the price tag.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 25 09:26:15 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-25 01:32, Marion wrote:
    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:24:07 -0400, badgolferman wrote :


    On 07/24/2025 17:21, Marion wrote:
    But I think the MAGA herd-animal Apple religious trolls "can" be taught. >>> Don't you?

    Unfortunately I don't think there are too many people on the entirety of
    Usenet who "can" be taught anything. It seems arguing ad nauseam is the
    prevailing activity now.

    While this is likely true, particularly of the MAGA trolls like Alan Baker who participate in conversations and then forget them just days later...

    I'm wondering how you can know that...

    ...given your claim to have killfiled me.

    :-)


    Jolly Roger, Your Name, NY, Chris, -hh, Haemactylus, Tyrone, et al.
    All these MAGA trolls need to learn what Apple has been doing to them.

    I think overall MAGA trolls can't avoid the fact that Apple's deceit shows they are one of the most duplicitous companies in the United States.
    <https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2020/03/apple-settles-with-french-authorities-over-25-mill>

    Apple settled what was effectively a nuisance lawsuit.


    (Short of big tobacco, who is even worse than Apple on their brazen lies.)

    Apple brazenly lied about batterygate for example, and got away with it. (Resulting monetary costs totaled well over a billion dollars though.)

    What is the "lie" supposed to have been?


    The MAGA trolls claim Apple can afford to brazenly criminally lie to all;
    but I assess that eventually even the MAGA trolls can learn about Apple.

    It used to be that Apple only lied outside of court, where, for example, Apple has been lying about "efficiency" for years (yet, it was all a lie).

    Now it seems Apple even deceitfully lies in court, they're that horrid.
    <https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/game-over-for-apple-tax-says-epic-ceo-after-app-store-ruling/articleshow/120787261.cms>

    Apple's brazen greenwashing lies will come to bite them as they're obvious.
    <https://trellis.net/article/apple-lawsuit-highlights-the-perils-of-making-carbon-neutral-claims/>

    Very few companies are as profitable & deceitful as Apple is where those profits are due mainly to Apple's brazen lies to the hapless consumer.

    Apple even recently lied disparaging the EU benchmarks where only Apple couldn't earn an A in efficiency - almost everyone else but Apple did.

    Apple voluntarily downgraded devices that had earned an A in independent testing.

    "Third-party testing commissioned by Apple substantiates our concerns.
    After conducting the prescribed tumble tests for iPhone internally, we
    opted to have three third-party labs repeat the tests in an effort to
    validate the results. We provided no specific guidance other than to
    follow the regulation, leaving decisions about how to resolve
    ambiguities at the labs’ discretion. Predictably, the labs’ individual results differed widely from Apple’s results and each other. In one
    case, third-party lab results differed from each other by three letter
    grades."

    <https://regulatoryinfo.apple.com/cwt/api/ext/file?fileId=whitePaperEnergyLabels/EU_Energy_Label_for_iPhone_and_iPad_EN_1749628569689.pdf>

    "Apple’s Compliance and Adjustments

    Apple’s current iPhone lineup meets the highest “A” grade in energy efficiency based on EU testing. However, Apple voluntarily downgraded
    these ratings to “B” due to ambiguities in the EU’s testing protocols, particularly regarding energy efficiency and drop resistance tests."

    <https://informeurope.com/2025/06/21/apple-devices-in-eu-now-feature-repair-scores-and-battery-life-labels-what-consumers-need-to-know/>




    The innocent MAGA herd-animal zealots think Apple's profits are due to product, but what they don't realize is they're being lied to by Apple.

    Apple's profits are a direct function of Apple's brazen public lies.
    The product is barely functional (it doesn't even have basic hardware).

    Apple's profits are a direct function of making products that work so
    well for people that they are willing to pay premium prices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 25 09:31:45 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-25 01:32, Marion wrote:
    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 18:16:47 +1200, Your Name wrote :


    On 2025-07-24 23:29:24 +0000, Tyrone said:
    On Jul 23, 2025 at 9:43:07 PM EDT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    Inside the devices, yes, as I posted, but you snipped, but regular
    consumers can still go to the nearest tech store and buy an external
    hard disk drives. Disk drives are far more 'bang for your buck' than
    SSDs will be for a long time yet (hard drives cost around 3c-6c per GB >>>> while SSDs cost 8-10c per GB, so SSDs cost around twice as much for the >>>> same capacity).

    And spinning hard drives are also slower, heavier and use more power. I only
    use them for backups. Not for daily use.

    True, although "slower" is really just a matter if personal patience
    levels for most people. I have zero problems waiting an extra second or
    two while saving half the price (roughly) for the same capactiy. :-)

    Power isn't too much of an issue. The small portable hard drives are
    usually USB powered, so there is no power brick to worry about. They
    also aren't that heavy and could be easily carried around.

    Of course, if you want truly light, portable, and low-powered, you
    would go with USB stick drives instead, but they are mostly
    lower-capacity in comparison.

    The problem with the iPhone lacking any semblance of basic functionality is that you have to be rich to be able to do anything useful with the iPhone.

    What utter bullshit.


    The iPhone is so unusable out of the box that you have to literally spend hundreds of dollars just to start to get the damn thing to start working.

    Ummmmm...nope. I bought an iPhone 16 back in December of last year...

    ...and I haven't spent a single dollar to get it to work.

    Sorry.


    It's no longer shocking that the MAGA trolls go to great length to justify the obvious fact that the iPhone lacks even the most basic of hardware.

    No iPhone ever sold prior to the iPhone 15 is legal to sell new in the EU
    due to the paucity of the hardware that is inherent in brain dead iPhones.

    No iPhone older than the iPhone 15 is sold by Apple...

    ...anywhere.

    Because anything earlier than the iPhone 15 is now two generations old
    and Apple typically discontinues devices at that point.


    The iPhone lack industry standard hardware such as sd slot & aux jacks.

    Not an industry standard; either of them.

    The iPhone paltry RAM and iPhone garbage batteries are a laughing stock.
    The lack of a proper charger shows Apple fucks their customer left & right.

    People already HAVE chargers.


    Worse, the apps on the phone, if you don't create an Apple Account, will eventually all die over time if you update the operating system.

    So get an Apple account.


    Even if you add that horrifically restrictive privacy-robbing Apple ID, you're still stuck with a brain-dead device that is merely a dumb terminal.

    "privacy-robbing" because you need to give a phone number?


    The device can't do anything useful without ANOTHER device you own next to
    it for the rest of your life (as you have to prove who you are to Apple).

    False.


    Even after carrying around TWO DEVICES everywhere you go (or proving to
    Apple by other means who you actually are) it's STILL brain dead in that it can't do half the things that every non-Apple phone easily does.

    False.


    What bothers me isn't so much that the iPhone is a dysfunctional piece of junk but that Apple successfully lies to people saying that it's not.

    And yet - it is.

    There are few companies as deceitful as Apple is (where it used to be that Apple only told the truth in court but they've broken that stricture).

    And few as profitable.
    As a direct result of Apple's brazen lies.

    My issue is that people are dumb enough to *believe* those lies.
    So my goal is to ensure nobody on this newsgroup is that ignorant.

    Were you sexually assaulted with an Apple device at some point?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Fri Jul 25 21:37:07 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 25 Jul 2025 14:37:00 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    You know next to
    nothing about basic networking, and even less about Apple products.

    My goal is to teach you MAGA religious zealots what Apple's strategy is.

    You bought all that missing basic hardware functionality back, JR.
    *Apple (profits) loves you for that.*

    You substituted money, for brains. (No wonder Apple profits so much!)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to -hh on Fri Jul 25 21:36:23 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 07:00:45 -0400, -hh wrote :


    In contrast, the iPhone's integral storage is on NvME with 3-4GB/sec
    reads & 2-3GB/sec writes.

    How much did it cost you to purchase an iPhone with more than 64GB storage?

    Since I have receipts & I have a history of being able to substantiate
    may claims, you need to go first: set the benchmark for what is the "correct" amount to pay.

    Good question.
    My phone has many times 64GB of storage, but only 64GB of internal storage.

    More so, my daily drive phone has more functionality than any iPhone ever
    sold, so let's look at what I paid for mine (which does more than yours).

    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo Android

    I paid nothing for my daily drive from 2021 which is *still* more powerful
    than any iPhone ever sold (and the battery is huge & still going strong!).

    But I did pay the 10% sales tax on the $180MSRP so I paid $18 for each of
    the three Android phones I got for free (there's an iPhone there also).

    Hence, I paid $18 for a phone that is more powerful than any iPhone ever
    made, which is a true comparison price if you must ask me what I paid.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 25 22:07:04 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-25, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On 25 Jul 2025 14:37:00 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

    You know next to nothing about basic networking, and even less about
    Apple products.

    My goal is to teach

    Your goal is to troll, and that's all you do here.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 25 17:41:16 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 7/25/25 17:36, Marion wrote:
    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 07:00:45 -0400, -hh wrote :


    In contrast, the iPhone's integral storage is on NvME with 3-4GB/sec
    reads & 2-3GB/sec writes.

    How much did it cost you to purchase an iPhone with more than 64GB storage? >>
    Since I have receipts & I have a history of being able to substantiate
    may claims, you need to go first: set the benchmark for what is the
    "correct" amount to pay.

    Good question.
    My phone has many times 64GB of storage, but only 64GB of internal storage.

    More so, my daily drive phone has more functionality than any iPhone ever sold, so let's look at what I paid for mine (which does more than yours).

    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo Android

    I paid nothing for my daily drive from 2021 which is *still* more powerful than any iPhone ever sold (and the battery is huge & still going strong!).

    Nah, you got it at an alleged "free" because its cost was hidden in a
    cellphone service plan.

    That alone is sufficient to disqualify all of your fiscal claims.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to -hh on Sat Jul 26 10:35:43 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-25 10:51:34 +0000, -hh said:
    On 7/24/25 17:21, Marion wrote:
    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:34:07 -0400, -hh wrote :

    Nah, what's absurd is the belief that one's capability needs are to have >>> veritable terabytes of data on a smartphone.

    Case in point, what's the largest capacity Android phone sold today?

    In searching, i found that Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has 1TB, which is
    the same as what Apple's offered on their Pro Max iPhones since the 13.

    I do agree that most of us don't need to carry a terabyte attached to the
    device, but the point also is nobody needs more than 64GB internal storage.

    Didn't Bill Gates say something about no one needing more than 640K? /s

    Possibly, but Bill Gates is an idiot. :-p

    The Commodore 64 only needed 64K and the VIC20 only needed 5K. Most
    people don't really use their devices to do any more than they did on
    those old computers, it is today's over-bloated software (OS and apps)
    that requires ever-increasing amounts of memory. :-(



    So everything above 64GB of internal storage is a gross misuse of money
    (assuming the phone had an sd slot which is usually multiples of that).

    That's for the consumer to decide. Not you, not Bill Gates.


    My main point is to teach you that Apple's fundamental strategy on hardware >> capability is to limit what the iPhone can do so you have to buy it back.

    Meantime, SD cards are sold in different sizes+speeds, with each having
    its own price point; more = higher price: so where's any difference?


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to -hh on Sat Jul 26 10:31:19 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-25 21:41:16 +0000, -hh said:
    On 7/25/25 17:36, Marion wrote:
    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 07:00:45 -0400, -hh wrote :

    In contrast, the iPhone's integral storage is on NvME with 3-4GB/sec >>>>> reads & 2-3GB/sec writes.

    How much did it cost you to purchase an iPhone with more than 64GB storage?

    Since I have receipts & I have a history of being able to substantiate
    may claims, you need to go first: set the benchmark for what is the
    "correct" amount to pay.

    Good question.
    My phone has many times 64GB of storage, but only 64GB of internal storage. >>
    More so, my daily drive phone has more functionality than any iPhone ever
    sold, so let's look at what I paid for mine (which does more than yours).

    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo Android >>
    I paid nothing for my daily drive from 2021 which is *still* more powerful >> than any iPhone ever sold (and the battery is huge & still going strong!).

    Nah, you got it at an alleged "free" because its cost was hidden in a cellphone service plan.

    That alone is sufficient to disqualify all of your fiscal claims.


    -hh

    Plus, the "$0" Android phone will be a lower quality / cheaper device
    anyway. If you actually compared the iPhone with an close-comparable
    high-end Samsung phone, you'd find they have the same $15 price because
    the phone both have similar full retail prices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Jul 25 20:53:00 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 7/25/25 20:37, Alan wrote:
    On 2025-07-25 14:36, Marion wrote:
    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 07:00:45 -0400, -hh wrote :


    In contrast, the iPhone's integral storage is on NvME with 3-4GB/sec >>>>> reads & 2-3GB/sec writes.

    How much did it cost you to purchase an iPhone with more than 64GB
    storage?

    Since I have receipts & I have a history of being able to substantiate
    may claims, you need to go first:  set the benchmark for what is the
    "correct" amount to pay.

    Good question.
    My phone has many times 64GB of storage, but only 64GB of internal
    storage.

    More so, my daily drive phone has more functionality than any iPhone ever
    sold, so let's look at what I paid for mine (which does more than yours).

    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo
    Android

    I paid nothing for my daily drive from 2021 which is *still* more
    powerful
    than any iPhone ever sold (and the battery is huge & still going
    strong!).

    Post some benchmark for your phone...

    ...and it's regular retail price.


    But I did pay the 10% sales tax on the $180MSRP so I paid $18 for each of
    the three Android phones I got for free (there's an iPhone there also).

    Hence, I paid $18 for a phone that is more powerful than any iPhone ever
    made, which is a true comparison price if you must ask me what I paid.

    Let's see:

    Samsung Galaxy A32 5G released in 2021 compared to the iPHone 13, also released in 2021

                        Galaxy A32 5G 64GB    iPhone 13

    Release MSRP            $174?               $799

    So, yeah: the iPhone is definitely more expensive, but here's how the
    article where I found the price of the Galaxy describes it:

    'Do you really want a cheap 5G phone, or do you just want the best bang
    for your buck?'

    'The Samsung Galaxy A32 design is about what you'd expect for a budget phone.'

    Screen:             720 x 1600             1170 x 2532
    Brightness:          497 nits               802 nits

    Not twice as bright, but definitely better.

    Performance (speed)
    AnTuTu               226,561                775,519
    Geekbench              1,673                  4,645

    More than twice as fast in AnTuTu, and nearly three times as fast in Geekbench

    Shall I go on?

    Well, how about comparing that Galaxy to the lowest end iPhone of that
    year, namely the $399 iPhone SE 2020?

    Screen: 1334 × 750 (also more than the Galaxy A32)
    Brightness: 625 (25% higher than the Galaxy A32)
    AnTutu: 492,166 (218% that of the Galaxy A32)
    Geekbench: 3413 (204% that of the Galaxy A32)

    Or to split the release dates while doubling the storage to 128GB,
    consider the iPhone SE 2022, at a $429 MSRP.

    Screen: 1334 × 750 (no change; also more than the Galaxy A32)
    Brightness: 625 (no change; still 25% higher than the Galaxy A32)
    AnTutu: 492,166 --> 644,640 (218% --> 285% that of the Galaxy A32)
    Geekbench: 3413 --> 4021 (204% --> 240% that of the Galaxy A32)



    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 25 17:37:03 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-25 14:36, Marion wrote:
    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 07:00:45 -0400, -hh wrote :


    In contrast, the iPhone's integral storage is on NvME with 3-4GB/sec
    reads & 2-3GB/sec writes.

    How much did it cost you to purchase an iPhone with more than 64GB storage? >>
    Since I have receipts & I have a history of being able to substantiate
    may claims, you need to go first: set the benchmark for what is the
    "correct" amount to pay.

    Good question.
    My phone has many times 64GB of storage, but only 64GB of internal storage.

    More so, my daily drive phone has more functionality than any iPhone ever sold, so let's look at what I paid for mine (which does more than yours).

    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo Android

    I paid nothing for my daily drive from 2021 which is *still* more powerful than any iPhone ever sold (and the battery is huge & still going strong!).

    Post some benchmark for your phone...

    ...and it's regular retail price.


    But I did pay the 10% sales tax on the $180MSRP so I paid $18 for each of
    the three Android phones I got for free (there's an iPhone there also).

    Hence, I paid $18 for a phone that is more powerful than any iPhone ever made, which is a true comparison price if you must ask me what I paid.

    Let's see:

    Samsung Galaxy A32 5G released in 2021 compared to the iPHone 13, also
    released in 2021

    Galaxy A32 5G 64GB iPhone 13

    Release MSRP $174? $799

    So, yeah: the iPhone is definitely more expensive, but here's how the
    article where I found the price of the Galaxy describes it:

    'Do you really want a cheap 5G phone, or do you just want the best bang
    for your buck?'

    'The Samsung Galaxy A32 design is about what you'd expect for a budget
    phone.'

    Screen: 720 x 1600 1170 x 2532
    Brightness: 497 nits 802 nits

    Not twice as bright, but definitely better.

    Performance (speed)
    AnTuTu 226,561 775,519
    Geekbench 1,673 4,645

    More than twice as fast in AnTuTu, and nearly three times as fast in
    Geekbench

    Shall I go on?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 25 18:22:12 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-25 14:37, Marion wrote:
    On 25 Jul 2025 14:37:00 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    You know next to
    nothing about basic networking, and even less about Apple products.

    My goal is to teach you MAGA religious zealots what Apple's strategy is.

    You bought all that missing basic hardware functionality back, JR.
    *Apple (profits) loves you for that.*

    What did I buy that I was missing?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Your Name on Fri Jul 25 18:21:45 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-25 15:35, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-07-25 10:51:34 +0000, -hh said:
    On 7/24/25 17:21, Marion wrote:
    On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:34:07 -0400, -hh wrote :

    Nah, what's absurd is the belief that one's capability needs are to
    have
    veritable terabytes of data on a smartphone.

    Case in point, what's the largest capacity Android phone sold today?

    In searching, i found that Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has 1TB, which is
    the same as what Apple's offered on their Pro Max iPhones since the 13. >>>
    I do agree that most of us don't need to carry a terabyte attached to
    the
    device, but the point also is nobody needs more than 64GB internal
    storage.

    Didn't Bill Gates say something about no one needing more than 640K?  /s

    Possibly, but Bill Gates is an idiot.  :-p

    The Commodore 64 only needed 64K and the VIC20 only needed 5K. Most
    people don't really use their devices to do any more than they did on
    those old computers, it is today's over-bloated software (OS and apps)
    that requires ever-increasing amounts of memory.    :-(

    Sorry, dude, but you are OUT OF YOUR MIND if you think any computer that
    people would want to use could work with only 640K; let alone the 64K.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to -hh on Sat Jul 26 01:57:19 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 20:53:00 -0400, -hh wrote :


    Well, how about comparing that Galaxy to the lowest end iPhone of that
    year, namely the $399 iPhone SE 2020?

    The point is the iPhone of today has no basic functionality.
    So you are forced to spend *hundreds* just to buy it all back.

    That Galaxy has an sd slot, aux jack & huge battery which no iPhone made
    today has (and no iPhone has ever been sold with a battery as large).

    Worse, you paid *hundreds* more to recover all that lost functionality.

    With customers like you whales, it's no wonder Apple profits are huge.
    You have to buy back at inflated prices all the missing functionality.

    Oh, and it has more storage (via sd) than any iPhone ever sold has!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Sat Jul 26 01:57:39 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 23:08:02 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    Seeing a trend yet?

    Yes, of COURSE the SD card is trending down.

    Why do you think most Android phones have the industry standard slot?

    Since Apple phones are more popular in the U.S. than Android phones (around 59%-41% right now), we can say that around 25% of phones in use in the U.S. have an SD slot.

    No expensive iPhone has the functionality of even the cheapest Android.
    People in the USA can afford to buy back all that missing functionality.

    Why do you think Apple is one of the most profitable companies in the USA?

    AGAIN, how is that an "industry standard"????

    Well, how are you going to double your storage on that non-standard iPhone?

    The answer of COURSE is that it USED to be an "industry standard". So were floppy drives, spinning hard drives, CDs/DVDs and lots of other stuff.

    All are gone, and SD cards are rapidly going away.

    The main reason Apple is so profitable is they are able to bamboozle you.

    Apple removes functionality (like the aux jack) just because it works.
    If they didn't remove it, then you wouldn't need to buy it back, Tyrone.

    Don't you understand Apple's profit-making strategy yet, Tyrone?
    The only reason iPhones lack basic functionality is so you buy it back.

    *Bamboozled people like you are the reason Apple is so profitable.*
    Tim Cook laughs at you all the way to the bank.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sat Jul 26 01:57:58 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 23 Jul 2025 23:24:32 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    But then, we live in the 21st century.

    They have to live in the past in order for their lame troll to work.

    No iPhone on the planet can do what any Android phone with an sd card can.

    FACT: No iPhone user needs an SD card.

    *Did you ever wonder why Apple is so profitable?*
    Tim Cook laughs at you all the way to the bank, Jolly Roger.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Your Name on Sat Jul 26 01:58:11 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 10:31:19 +1200, Your Name wrote :


    Plus, the "$0" Android phone will be a lower quality / cheaper device
    anyway. If you actually compared the iPhone with an close-comparable
    high-end Samsung phone, you'd find they have the same $15 price because
    the phone both have similar full retail prices.

    It's always the case that you herd-animal MAGA ignorant uneducated Apple
    trolls have no concept of how much money spend to increase Apple profit.

    For a total of $38, that April 2021 $18 phone with a $20 sdcard has more functionality than any iPhone ever sold.

    Which is the point.

    If you paid more than $50 for that utter garbage iPhone, you got screwed.
    You'd still have to pay *hundreds* to get the missing functionality back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to -hh on Sat Jul 26 01:58:23 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 17:41:16 -0400, -hh wrote :


    Good question.
    My phone has many times 64GB of storage, but only 64GB of internal storage. >>
    More so, my daily drive phone has more functionality than any iPhone ever
    sold, so let's look at what I paid for mine (which does more than yours).

    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo Android >>
    I paid nothing for my daily drive from 2021 which is *still* more powerful >> than any iPhone ever sold (and the battery is huge & still going strong!).

    Nah, you got it at an alleged "free" because its cost was hidden in a cellphone service plan.

    That alone is sufficient to disqualify all of your fiscal claims.

    You ignorant uneducated MAGA Apple zealot trolls never understand anything. It's literally what is wrong with all you herd animal Apple trolls.

    You asked me what a phone far more functionality than any iPhone costs.
    I gave you the receipt for Christ's sake.

    You Apple trolls are so incredibly undecidedly ignorant, even something aqs simple as a basic receipt is too complicated for you to comprehend.

    Every person in the USA on a postpaid T-Mobile plan received a free Android Samsung Galaxy A32-5G (if they asked for it) with no change in costs.

    The only thing they had to pay for that free phone was the sales tax.
    Which, for me, in California, in April of 2021, was 10% of the %180 MSRP.

    The fact is that $18 phone has more functionality than any iPhone sold.
    Hence, if you paid more than $18 for your iPhone, you were screwed.

    You were forced to pay hundreds of dollars wasted for a phone that doesn't
    even have the basic functionality of an $18 64GB phone with an sd slot.

    Which is the point, after all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sat Jul 26 01:59:02 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 25 Jul 2025 22:07:04 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    Your goal is to troll, and that's all you do here.

    If proving to you MAGA zealots what Apple's strategy is, so be it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Your Name on Sat Jul 26 01:59:27 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 10:31:19 +1200, Your Name wrote :


    More so, my daily drive phone has more functionality than any iPhone ever >>> sold, so let's look at what I paid for mine (which does more than yours). >>>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo Android >>>
    I paid nothing for my daily drive from 2021 which is *still* more powerful >>> than any iPhone ever sold (and the battery is huge & still going strong!). >>
    Nah, you got it at an alleged "free" because its cost was hidden in a
    cellphone service plan.

    That alone is sufficient to disqualify all of your fiscal claims.

    -hh

    Plus, the "$0" Android phone will be a lower quality / cheaper device
    anyway. If you actually compared the iPhone with an close-comparable
    high-end Samsung phone, you'd find they have the same $15 price because
    the phone both have similar full retail prices.

    Every person in the USA on a postpaid T-Mobile plan received a free Android Samsung Galaxy A32-5G (if they asked for it) with no change in costs.

    You ignorant uneducated MAGA Apple zealot trolls never understand anything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 25 19:35:55 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-25 18:57, Marion wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 23:08:02 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    Seeing a trend yet?

    Yes, of COURSE the SD card is trending down.

    Why do you think most Android phones have the industry standard slot?

    Why do you think more and more don't?


    Since Apple phones are more popular in the U.S. than Android phones (around >> 59%-41% right now), we can say that around 25% of phones in use in the U.S. >> have an SD slot.

    No expensive iPhone has the functionality of even the cheapest Android. People in the USA can afford to buy back all that missing functionality.

    But most people don't even use the SD card slot if they aren't sold one
    when they first buy the phone.


    Why do you think Apple is one of the most profitable companies in the USA?

    Their products are so desirable that people are willing to pay high
    prices for them.


    AGAIN, how is that an "industry standard"????

    Well, how are you going to double your storage on that non-standard iPhone?

    I'm not. But I bought what I needed when I bought the phone.


    The answer of COURSE is that it USED to be an "industry standard". So were >> floppy drives, spinning hard drives, CDs/DVDs and lots of other stuff.

    All are gone, and SD cards are rapidly going away.

    The main reason Apple is so profitable is they are able to bamboozle you.

    Nope.


    Apple removes functionality (like the aux jack) just because it works.

    Nope.

    If they didn't remove it, then you wouldn't need to buy it back, Tyrone.

    It was replaced by first Lightning and later USB-C ear buds...

    ...which you don't need to buy from Apple.


    Don't you understand Apple's profit-making strategy yet, Tyrone?
    The only reason iPhones lack basic functionality is so you buy it back.

    *Bamboozled people like you are the reason Apple is so profitable.*
    Tim Cook laughs at you all the way to the bank.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 25 19:36:33 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-25 18:57, Marion wrote:
    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 20:53:00 -0400, -hh wrote :


    Well, how about comparing that Galaxy to the lowest end iPhone of that
    year, namely the $399 iPhone SE 2020?

    The point is the iPhone of today has no basic functionality.
    So you are forced to spend *hundreds* just to buy it all back.

    What did I buy back?


    That Galaxy has an sd slot, aux jack & huge battery which no iPhone made today has (and no iPhone has ever been sold with a battery as large).

    I don't care about the size of the battery.

    Only how long the phone runs.


    Worse, you paid *hundreds* more to recover all that lost functionality.

    With customers like you whales, it's no wonder Apple profits are huge.
    You have to buy back at inflated prices all the missing functionality.

    Oh, and it has more storage (via sd) than any iPhone ever sold has!


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Jul 25 19:37:06 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-25 18:58, Marion wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 10:31:19 +1200, Your Name wrote :


    Plus, the "$0" Android phone will be a lower quality / cheaper device
    anyway. If you actually compared the iPhone with an close-comparable
    high-end Samsung phone, you'd find they have the same $15 price because
    the phone both have similar full retail prices.

    It's always the case that you herd-animal MAGA ignorant uneducated Apple trolls have no concept of how much money spend to increase Apple profit.

    For a total of $38, that April 2021 $18 phone with a $20 sdcard has more functionality than any iPhone ever sold.

    You're lying when you call it an "$18 phone".


    Which is the point.

    If you paid more than $50 for that utter garbage iPhone, you got screwed. You'd still have to pay *hundreds* to get the missing functionality back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Sat Jul 26 18:43:49 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:59:05 -0400, Tom Elam wrote :


    Having owned numerous Android phones I can tell you that the SD card is almost useless. You cannot put apps on the SD card. Many apps do not
    enable SD card access. I found that in practice it was more trouble than
    it was worth. With Apple you do not have to worry about 2 very different storage media. It's worth it to have all apps and all data in one place.

    Why do I have almost a thousand apps on my 64GB Android, Tom Elam without
    any problems (where my sd card is many times the internal phone storage).

    And you can't?

    The reason you can't do anything on that iPhone that Android phones with
    basic hardware can do is Apple didn't give you the choice of hardware.

    You bought a phone that lacks everything that has worked for years.
    Which is EXACTLY what Apple's profit-making strategy is, Tom Elam.

    I'm trying to teach you what Apple's profit-making strategy is.
    Why do you think they're so profitable anyway, Tom?

    The iPhone is barely functional because Apple removed what actually works.
    Then you are forced to buy it all back.

    It's sheer genius.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Sun Jul 27 09:39:18 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-26 12:59:05 +0000, Tom Elam said:
    On 7/22/2025 9:09 PM, Marion wrote:
    Why is the iPhone always lacking in basic industry standard hardware
    functionality?

    While every iPhone lacks basic hardware, most of Android has it.

    This Android search shows 2,114 Android phones with the sd slot included.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2&idCardslot=1>

    That's out of 3205 Android phones (if I remove the sd slot criteria).
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2>

    That means 66% of Android phones out there still have the sd slot hardware. >>
    Out of 223 Samsung Android phones currently being sold today
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2>

    Out of those 223, 165 have the sd slot, which is 74% of Samsung phones.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sMakers=9&sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2&idCardslot=1>


    As for Sony's 22 models currently sold today, 100% have the sd slot.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sMakers=7&sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2> >> <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?sMakers=7&sAvailabilities=1,2&idOS=2&idCardslot=1>


    There are things a phone with a card in the sd slot can do that are
    impossible to do any other way - so I agree it's a critically important
    basic hardware feature if you want to make the most of your phone.

    Having owned numerous Android phones I can tell you that the SD card is almost useless. You cannot put apps on the SD card. Many apps do not
    enable SD card access. I found that in practice it was more trouble
    than it was worth. With Apple you do not have to worry about 2 very
    different storage media. It's worth it to have all apps and all data in
    one place.

    And for the tiny minority that do need extra storage space, they can
    easily just plug in and use normal USB-C keyring drives or bigger
    capacity portable SSDs or hard drives.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Sat Jul 26 19:57:04 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-26 11:43, Marion wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:59:05 -0400, Tom Elam wrote :


    Having owned numerous Android phones I can tell you that the SD card is
    almost useless. You cannot put apps on the SD card. Many apps do not
    enable SD card access. I found that in practice it was more trouble than
    it was worth. With Apple you do not have to worry about 2 very different
    storage media. It's worth it to have all apps and all data in one place.

    Why do I have almost a thousand apps on my 64GB Android, Tom Elam without
    any problems (where my sd card is many times the internal phone storage).

    Why, Arlen, do you have to mention the name, Arlen, of the person to
    whose post you are replying, Arlen?

    And I bet you don't have anywhere NEAR a thousand apps.


    And you can't?

    The reason you can't do anything on that iPhone that Android phones with basic hardware can do is Apple didn't give you the choice of hardware.

    You bought a phone that lacks everything that has worked for years.
    Which is EXACTLY what Apple's profit-making strategy is, Tom Elam.

    I'm trying to teach you what Apple's profit-making strategy is.
    Why do you think they're so profitable anyway, Tom?

    The iPhone is barely functional because Apple removed what actually works. Then you are forced to buy it all back.

    It's sheer genius.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Marion on Sun Jul 27 06:44:58 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 7/25/25 21:58, Marion wrote:
    On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 17:41:16 -0400, -hh wrote :


    Good question.
    My phone has many times 64GB of storage, but only 64GB of internal storage. >>>
    More so, my daily drive phone has more functionality than any iPhone ever >>> sold, so let's look at what I paid for mine (which does more than yours). >>>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo Android >>>
    I paid nothing for my daily drive from 2021 which is *still* more powerful >>> than any iPhone ever sold (and the battery is huge & still going strong!). >>
    Nah, you got it at an alleged "free" because its cost was hidden in a
    cellphone service plan.

    That alone is sufficient to disqualify all of your fiscal claims.

    You ignorant uneducated MAGA ...


    Tsk, tsk, tsk: now stooping to name-calling, because you know you lost
    the debate on its actual merits: another legitimacy disqualifier.


    Every person in the USA on a postpaid T-Mobile plan received a free Android Samsung Galaxy A32-5G (if they asked for it) with no change in costs.


    The only thing they had to pay for that free phone was the sales tax.

    Repeating your lie doesn't make it any more true: you only got it at an alleged "free" because its cost was hidden in a cellphone service plan.

    Case in point: who amongst all of the $18/mo iPhone purchasers also got
    sent a "free" Galaxy phone too?


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to -hh on Sun Jul 27 17:19:41 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 06:44:58 -0400, -hh wrote :


    The only thing they had to pay for that free phone was the sales tax.

    Repeating your lie doesn't make it any more true: you only got it at an alleged "free" because its cost was hidden in a cellphone service plan.

    You think I don't know how much I paid before & after the free phones?
    <https://i.postimg.cc/YC1B906F/tmopromo01.jpg> A32-5G & iPhone 12 contract
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo Android
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nhpbcP50/tmopromo04.jpg> $100 for 6 lines + $16 fees

    It's interesting how you fabricate MAGA conspiracies simply because you
    can't understand the simple math that *everyone* else easily understood.

    You fabricate this inane conspiracy that T-Mobile somehow increased my
    monthly cost simply because they gave me three free Android phones.

    Your absurd MAGA conspiracy theory requires my costs to have gone up.
    And yet, they didn't. My costs were $100/month before & after the phone.

    I'm *still* paying the same ~$100/month as I was in 2018, three years
    *before* I received the 3 free Android phones (& five years later).

    Yet your fabricated MAGA conspiracy theory requires that I don't know that. Worse, your fabricated MAGA conspiracy requires that I'm lying about costs.

    Yet, every single person in the USA on T-Mobile was offered the same deal.

    Case in point: who amongst all of the $18/mo iPhone purchasers also got
    sent a "free" Galaxy phone too?

    Every single person in the USA on T-Mobile & Sprint was offered the deal. Everyone who wanted it got the free phone without their plan changing.

    What's no longer shocking is you are not capable of understanding that.
    It's why I assess all you Apple MAGA religious zealot trolls as low IQ.

    The entire reason you're an Apple herd animal is because your IQ is low. There's nothing you comprehend - so you simply follow the herd instinct.

    Please understand that I don't hate you even as you hate me.
    I know you've been told you're stupid your entire life & I haven't.

    But please, try for once in your life to comprehend basic math.
    Everyone was offered this deal; we discussed it in detail on this group.

    You think just because everyone else is smarter than you are that it's a
    MAGA conspiracy to make you pay more money for your phone than you needed.

    But the main reason you pay through the nose for an iPhone is because
    Apple's strategy is to remove functionality so you have to buy it back.

    That's where the profits are coming from.
    Ignorant uneducated MAGA people like you who don't/can't understand that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Marion on Mon Jul 28 09:00:07 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 7/27/25 13:19, Marion wrote:
    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 06:44:58 -0400, -hh wrote :


    The only thing they had to pay for that free phone was the sales tax.

    Repeating your lie doesn't make it any more true: you only got it at an
    alleged "free" because its cost was hidden in a cellphone service plan.

    You think I don't know how much I paid before & after the free phones?
    <https://i.postimg.cc/YC1B906F/tmopromo01.jpg> A32-5G & iPhone 12 contract
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo Android
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nhpbcP50/tmopromo04.jpg> $100 for 6 lines + $16 fees

    Those all are merely offers, not an actual IRL phone service bill.


    It's interesting how you fabricate MAGA conspiracies simply because you
    can't understand the simple math that *everyone* else easily understood.

    You fabricate this inane conspiracy that T-Mobile somehow increased my monthly cost simply because they gave me three free Android phones.

    Nope, I merely noted that you have out-of-pocket expenses that you're
    ignoring in order to get your "free!" product.

    Case in point, I get "free" coffee & pastries when I take my car to the dealership for an oil change ... I only had to buy a car from them! /s



    Your absurd MAGA conspiracy theory requires my costs to have gone up.
    And yet, they didn't. My costs were $100/month before & after the phone.

    I'm *still* paying the same ~$100/month as I was in 2018, three years *before* I received the 3 free Android phones (& five years later).

    Wrong claim. What you need to figure out is how much lower their
    service rates would have been if they weren't including in their costs
    the costs of the hardware that they're giving to customers for 'free': TANSTAAFL applies.


    Yet, every single person in the USA on T-Mobile was offered the same deal.

    Case in point: who amongst all of the $18/mo iPhone purchasers also got
    sent a "free" Galaxy phone too?

    Every single person in the USA on T-Mobile & Sprint was offered the deal. Everyone who wanted it got the free phone without their plan changing.

    Including those who opted for paying for an iPhone?

    Because that's the question I asked: they ended up getting two phones.
    So let's see proof of that.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Tue Jul 29 22:41:54 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 10:36:27 -0400, Tom Elam wrote :


    On 7/26/2025 2:43 PM, Marion wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:59:05 -0400, Tom Elam wrote :

    Having owned numerous Android phones I can tell you that the SD card is
    almost useless. You cannot put apps on the SD card. Many apps do not
    enable SD card access. I found that in practice it was more trouble than >>> it was worth. With Apple you do not have to worry about 2 very different >>> storage media. It's worth it to have all apps and all data in one place.

    Why do I have almost a thousand apps on my 64GB Android, Tom Elam without
    any problems (where my sd card is many times the internal phone storage).

    And you can't?

    The reason you can't do anything on that iPhone that Android phones with
    basic hardware can do is Apple didn't give you the choice of hardware.

    You bought a phone that lacks everything that has worked for years.
    Which is EXACTLY what Apple's profit-making strategy is, Tom Elam.

    I'm trying to teach you what Apple's profit-making strategy is.
    Why do you think they're so profitable anyway, Tom?

    The iPhone is barely functional because Apple removed what actually works. >> Then you are forced to buy it all back.

    It's sheer genius.

    I think you are lying. Big time. Theory and practice diverge in this case.

    March 2024 article:

    https://www.howtogeek.com/114667/how-to-install-android-apps-to-the-sd-card-by-default-move-almost-any-app-to-the-sd-card/

    I read the entire article and things have not changed since my Android
    phone days.

    Some quotes:

    "Some Android phones don't have a lot of storage, which means you might
    run out of space for apps. If your device has a microSD card slot, you
    can use that to expand the storage and have more room for apps. However,
    SD card support is more limited than it used to be."

    It's getting more limited?

    "Android apps are installed on your device's internal storage by
    default. If you have a microSD card, you can move some of your currently installed apps over to the microSD card. This is not supported by all
    apps, however. In fact, many don't support this feature at all."

    In my experience it was very few that could be moved and still even work
    as designed.

    "Running an app off your SD card will almost always be slower than
    running it off the internal storage, so only use this if you absolutely
    have toXand if you can, try to use it for apps that don't require a lot
    of speed to run well."

    VERY true, if you can even move them over.

    "Some manufacturersXnamely, Samsung and LGXallowed users to format
    microSD cards as internal storage prior to around 2022. That meant apps
    and games would be installed there by default. Sadly, this feature is no longer present on newer devices."

    When I tried this on A 64 mb Samsung phone the apps on the SD card were unstable.

    "Technically, it's still possible if you're willing to go through the
    trouble of rooting your Android phone. Rooting an Android phone is not
    as worth it as it used to be. Android has gotten much better and the
    rooting process has only gotten more difficult. It's simply not a
    legitimate solution for the majority of people."

    Did you root your phone?

    "Sadly, not many Android phones have SD card slots anymore, and it seems
    that even fewer apps support the ability to be moved to external
    storage. If you do have an SD card slot, you should take advantage of it."

    Android is moving to the Apple memory model.

    Summary, Apple's unified memory is a superior solution to having 2 very different sets of memory.

    You MAGA Apple trolls understand nothing.
    I never said I installed the apps on the sd card, Tom.
    I never said I set up the sd card as extended memory either, Tom.

    What I said was I have no problem with a thousand apps on my phone.
    Where they store their data (e.g., map data, or photos) on the sd card.

    You Apple MAGA trolls understand nothing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to -hh on Tue Jul 29 22:42:03 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 09:00:07 -0400, -hh wrote :


    You think I don't know how much I paid before & after the free phones?
    <https://i.postimg.cc/YC1B906F/tmopromo01.jpg> A32-5G & iPhone 12 contract >> <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo Android >> <https://i.postimg.cc/nhpbcP50/tmopromo04.jpg> $100 for 6 lines + $16 fees

    Those all are merely offers, not an actual IRL phone service bill.

    This is a copy of my bill for heaven's sake.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/YC1B906F/tmopromo01.jpg> A32-5G & iPhone 12 contract
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo Android
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nhpbcP50/tmopromo04.jpg> $100 for 6 lines + $16 fees

    What is wrong with you MAGA Apple trolls? Seriously? That was my bill.
    I paid $116/month then, and it's now $120/month (due to taxes going up).

    Let me explain what is wrong with the brain in all you MAGA Apple trolls.
    a. You have shitty plans
    b. Those shitty plans charge you *extra* when you get a phone
    c. So you think everyone is as dumb as you are in having shitty plans

    Guess what?

    Not everyone is as dumb as you are.
    Some people do not have a shitty plan.

    T-Mobile does not charge me for the phone.
    They don't care what phone I use.
    If they give me a free phone, what they do is hold a lien on that phone for
    two years. I'm not special. Everyone on T-Mobile gets the exact same deal.

    Over the two years, they subtract 1/24th the cost on that lien.
    After two years, you own the phone completely.

    They even remove the network lock unilaterally on that two year date.
    They don't change your plan before, during or after.

    You don't even have a contract. You can cancel the plan any time.
    No hidden cancellation fees either.

    It's interesting how you fabricate MAGA conspiracies simply because you
    can't understand the simple math that *everyone* else easily understood.

    You fabricate this inane conspiracy that T-Mobile somehow increased my
    monthly cost simply because they gave me three free Android phones.

    Nope, I merely noted that you have out-of-pocket expenses that you're ignoring in order to get your "free!" product.

    Case in point, I get "free" coffee & pastries when I take my car to the dealership for an oil change ... I only had to buy a car from them!

    I already have the T-Mobile plan so there are no extra costs.
    It costs the same whether or not they give me a free phone.

    T-Mobile doesn't change the plan just because they gave you a free phone.

    Your absurd MAGA conspiracy theory requires my costs to have gone up.
    And yet, they didn't. My costs were $100/month before & after the phone.

    I'm *still* paying the same ~$100/month as I was in 2018, three years
    *before* I received the 3 free Android phones (& five years later).

    Wrong claim. What you need to figure out is how much lower their
    service rates would have been if they weren't including in their costs
    the costs of the hardware that they're giving to customers for 'free': TANSTAAFL applies.

    I understand fully what you're implying, which is reasonable except that
    you pay the exact same for the plan whether or not you allow them to give
    you a free phone every two years.

    The plan doesn't change.
    The only thing that changes is if you drop them within those two years, you
    owe them the remainder of the phone (which is no big deal).

    For example, if they give you a $200 free phone and you drop it after one
    year, then you owe them for the $100 remaining on the phone.

    If you drop them after two years, nothing happens.
    You can get a free phone every two years, as far as I recall.

    And your plan cost never changes.

    Yet, every single person in the USA on T-Mobile was offered the same deal. >>
    Case in point: who amongst all of the $18/mo iPhone purchasers also got
    sent a "free" Galaxy phone too?

    Every single person in the USA on T-Mobile & Sprint was offered the deal.
    Everyone who wanted it got the free phone without their plan changing.

    Including those who opted for paying for an iPhone?

    Because that's the question I asked: they ended up getting two phones.
    So let's see proof of that.

    As you know, badgolferman took them up on the offer of a phone and as you
    know I also took them up on the offer of an iPhone (plus 3 Androids).

    The Androids were free. The iPhones were, in my case, 1/2 price.
    We covered this all in gory detail in April/May of 2021 by the way.

    As you can tell from the previous bills I posted prior, the Android phones
    were free but the iPhone cost me $282 which they were willing to charge me 1/24th of every month as an *addition* to my bill - but I paid it in full.

    But even if I took them up on the offer to pay the $282 for the iPhone 12
    mini over 24 months, it still doesn't change the cost of the service bill.

    They separate the cost of the phones from the service where the Androids
    were free so there was no cost, but the iPhone cost $282 in April 2021.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Tue Jul 29 22:42:12 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:10:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote :


    On 7/26/2025 10:57 PM, Alan wrote:
    And I bet you don't have anywhere NEAR a thousand apps.

    Having owned multiple Android phones I can tell you that there is no way
    to put a thousand apps on one, even if you had a 1 tb SD card.

    Can you imagine trying to even manage 1,000 apps? How would you organize
    that mess? I have 100 and need to put them in folders to keep up.

    Heh heh heh... we have entire threads, Tom, on how many apps we each have
    on our Android phone. Having a thousand apps is not difficult on Android.

    On Android, you can easily organize the phone to handle those apps.
    On iOS, organizing a thousand apps would be utterly miserable.

    That's another huge difference between the two mobile device platforms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Tue Jul 29 15:45:18 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-29 15:42, Marion wrote:
    On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:10:52 -0400, Tom Elam wrote :


    On 7/26/2025 10:57 PM, Alan wrote:
    And I bet you don't have anywhere NEAR a thousand apps.

    Having owned multiple Android phones I can tell you that there is no way
    to put a thousand apps on one, even if you had a 1 tb SD card.

    Can you imagine trying to even manage 1,000 apps? How would you organize
    that mess? I have 100 and need to put them in folders to keep up.

    Heh heh heh... we have entire threads, Tom, on how many apps we each have
    on our Android phone. Having a thousand apps is not difficult on Android.

    So show the screenshots, Arlen.

    You LOVE your screenshots.


    On Android, you can easily organize the phone to handle those apps.
    On iOS, organizing a thousand apps would be utterly miserable.

    Show it.


    That's another huge difference between the two mobile device platforms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Tue Jul 29 15:46:06 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-29 15:42, Marion wrote:
    On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:17:32 -0400, Tom Elam wrote :


    I'm trying to teach you what Apple's profit-making strategy is.
    Why do you think they're so profitable anyway, Tom?

    The iPhone is barely functional because Apple removed what actually works. >>
    Apple is profitable because of their tightly integrated ecosystem of
    products and services that nobody has been able to duplicate.

    The iPhone is way more functional than any of my Android phones were.
    And the iPad is years ahead of any Android tablet.

    I am not blinded by advertising and marketing. I have experienced both
    sides of the aisle. That's why I have not switched back.

    Apple's profits are the same as Big Tobacco profits.
    You've come a long way baby... to get where you got to today...
    You've come a long way baby... you've come a long long way...

    Take away Apple MARKETING (or Big Tobacco MARKETING)
    and the company profits go negative.

    Apple doesn't make iPhones. They make marketing.
    They sell to people who don't understand how anything works.

    Just like Big Tobacco did.

    Big Tobacco told women they needed their own Virginia Slims cigarette. Because they deserved it. It was designed for women. And they bought it.

    Just like you bought the iPhone.
    Apple's profits are sheer marketing genius.

    The iPhone can't do half of what Android phones do.
    And yet, there's nothing the iPhone can do that Android doesn't do.

    There are reasons for that fact.
    But you'd have to understand a lot more than you do now.

    So I'm teaching you slowly. Bit by bit.
    The first lesson is Apple removes hardware just so you have to buy it back.

    Unlike tobacco products, you can't actually be addicted to a smartphone.

    So if Apple's products were bad, people wouldn't go on buying them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Tue Jul 29 15:48:05 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-29 15:41, Marion wrote:
    On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 10:36:27 -0400, Tom Elam wrote :


    On 7/26/2025 2:43 PM, Marion wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:59:05 -0400, Tom Elam wrote :

    Having owned numerous Android phones I can tell you that the SD card is >>>> almost useless. You cannot put apps on the SD card. Many apps do not
    enable SD card access. I found that in practice it was more trouble than >>>> it was worth. With Apple you do not have to worry about 2 very different >>>> storage media. It's worth it to have all apps and all data in one place. >>>
    Why do I have almost a thousand apps on my 64GB Android, Tom Elam without >>> any problems (where my sd card is many times the internal phone storage). >>>
    And you can't?

    The reason you can't do anything on that iPhone that Android phones with >>> basic hardware can do is Apple didn't give you the choice of hardware.

    You bought a phone that lacks everything that has worked for years.
    Which is EXACTLY what Apple's profit-making strategy is, Tom Elam.

    I'm trying to teach you what Apple's profit-making strategy is.
    Why do you think they're so profitable anyway, Tom?

    The iPhone is barely functional because Apple removed what actually works. >>> Then you are forced to buy it all back.

    It's sheer genius.

    I think you are lying. Big time. Theory and practice diverge in this case. >>
    March 2024 article:

    https://www.howtogeek.com/114667/how-to-install-android-apps-to-the-sd-card-by-default-move-almost-any-app-to-the-sd-card/

    I read the entire article and things have not changed since my Android
    phone days.

    Some quotes:

    "Some Android phones don't have a lot of storage, which means you might
    run out of space for apps. If your device has a microSD card slot, you
    can use that to expand the storage and have more room for apps. However,
    SD card support is more limited than it used to be."

    It's getting more limited?

    "Android apps are installed on your device's internal storage by
    default. If you have a microSD card, you can move some of your currently
    installed apps over to the microSD card. This is not supported by all
    apps, however. In fact, many don't support this feature at all."

    In my experience it was very few that could be moved and still even work
    as designed.

    "Running an app off your SD card will almost always be slower than
    running it off the internal storage, so only use this if you absolutely
    have to—and if you can, try to use it for apps that don't require a lot
    of speed to run well."

    VERY true, if you can even move them over.

    "Some manufacturers—namely, Samsung and LG—allowed users to format
    microSD cards as internal storage prior to around 2022. That meant apps
    and games would be installed there by default. Sadly, this feature is no
    longer present on newer devices."

    When I tried this on A 64 mb Samsung phone the apps on the SD card were
    unstable.

    "Technically, it's still possible if you're willing to go through the
    trouble of rooting your Android phone. Rooting an Android phone is not
    as worth it as it used to be. Android has gotten much better and the
    rooting process has only gotten more difficult. It's simply not a
    legitimate solution for the majority of people."

    Did you root your phone?

    "Sadly, not many Android phones have SD card slots anymore, and it seems
    that even fewer apps support the ability to be moved to external
    storage. If you do have an SD card slot, you should take advantage of it." >>
    Android is moving to the Apple memory model.

    Summary, Apple's unified memory is a superior solution to having 2 very
    different sets of memory.

    You MAGA Apple trolls understand nothing.
    I never said I installed the apps on the sd card, Tom.
    I never said I set up the sd card as extended memory either, Tom.

    So if you don't use it as extended memory and you don't install apps on
    the SD card...

    ...then you're still bound by how much storage is built in to the phone,
    right?


    What I said was I have no problem with a thousand apps on my phone.
    Where they store their data (e.g., map data, or photos) on the sd card.

    Riiiiiiiiiight.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jul 30 00:55:37 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 29, 2025 at 6:48:33 PM EDT, "Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-07-29 15:42, Marion wrote:
    On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:07:29 -0400, Tom Elam wrote :


    There are no advantages to you in not having an sd card.
    Only disadvantages.

    All the advantages are in profit to Apple.
    Tim Cook laughs at you all the way to the bank.

    Apple has never had an SD card option in the iPhone or iPad. So they
    never "took it away".

    Your ignorance is showing again.

    If that is your sole argument then you have no argument.

    We're discussing here, like adults, what Apple's hardware strategy is.
    And that strategy is to limit the hardware capabilities of many things.

    Whether or not Apple "took it away" doesn't matter for that strategy.
    It matters only that it does not exist today.

    So if you buy an iPhone today, you don't get basic hardware functionality. >> The question is how is that fact part of Apple's basic strategy.

    And the answer turns out to be obvious to anyone who understands Apple.

    Goalpost shift!

    The sure sign of a lost argument. Also of an "Arlen Fact".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tyrone@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jul 30 00:59:30 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Jul 29, 2025 at 6:48:05 PM EDT, "Alan" <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-07-29 15:41, Marion wrote:
    On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 10:36:27 -0400, Tom Elam wrote :


    On 7/26/2025 2:43 PM, Marion wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:59:05 -0400, Tom Elam wrote :

    Having owned numerous Android phones I can tell you that the SD card is >>>>> almost useless. You cannot put apps on the SD card. Many apps do not >>>>> enable SD card access. I found that in practice it was more trouble than >>>>> it was worth. With Apple you do not have to worry about 2 very different >>>>> storage media. It's worth it to have all apps and all data in one place. >>>>
    Why do I have almost a thousand apps on my 64GB Android, Tom Elam without >>>> any problems (where my sd card is many times the internal phone storage). >>>>
    And you can't?

    The reason you can't do anything on that iPhone that Android phones with >>>> basic hardware can do is Apple didn't give you the choice of hardware. >>>>
    You bought a phone that lacks everything that has worked for years.
    Which is EXACTLY what Apple's profit-making strategy is, Tom Elam.

    I'm trying to teach you what Apple's profit-making strategy is.
    Why do you think they're so profitable anyway, Tom?

    The iPhone is barely functional because Apple removed what actually works. >>>> Then you are forced to buy it all back.

    It's sheer genius.

    I think you are lying. Big time. Theory and practice diverge in this case. >>>
    March 2024 article:

    https://www.howtogeek.com/114667/how-to-install-android-apps-to-the-sd-card-by-default-move-almost-any-app-to-the-sd-card/

    I read the entire article and things have not changed since my Android
    phone days.

    Some quotes:

    "Some Android phones don't have a lot of storage, which means you might
    run out of space for apps. If your device has a microSD card slot, you
    can use that to expand the storage and have more room for apps. However, >>> SD card support is more limited than it used to be."

    It's getting more limited?

    "Android apps are installed on your device's internal storage by
    default. If you have a microSD card, you can move some of your currently >>> installed apps over to the microSD card. This is not supported by all
    apps, however. In fact, many don't support this feature at all."

    In my experience it was very few that could be moved and still even work >>> as designed.

    "Running an app off your SD card will almost always be slower than
    running it off the internal storage, so only use this if you absolutely
    have to—and if you can, try to use it for apps that don't require a lot >>> of speed to run well."

    VERY true, if you can even move them over.

    "Some manufacturers—namely, Samsung and LG—allowed users to format
    microSD cards as internal storage prior to around 2022. That meant apps
    and games would be installed there by default. Sadly, this feature is no >>> longer present on newer devices."

    When I tried this on A 64 mb Samsung phone the apps on the SD card were
    unstable.

    "Technically, it's still possible if you're willing to go through the
    trouble of rooting your Android phone. Rooting an Android phone is not
    as worth it as it used to be. Android has gotten much better and the
    rooting process has only gotten more difficult. It's simply not a
    legitimate solution for the majority of people."

    Did you root your phone?

    "Sadly, not many Android phones have SD card slots anymore, and it seems >>> that even fewer apps support the ability to be moved to external
    storage. If you do have an SD card slot, you should take advantage of it." >>>
    Android is moving to the Apple memory model.

    Summary, Apple's unified memory is a superior solution to having 2 very
    different sets of memory.

    You MAGA Apple trolls understand nothing.
    I never said I installed the apps on the sd card, Tom.
    I never said I set up the sd card as extended memory either, Tom.

    So if you don't use it as extended memory and you don't install apps on
    the SD card...

    ...then you're still bound by how much storage is built in to the phone, right?


    What I said was I have no problem with a thousand apps on my phone.
    Where they store their data (e.g., map data, or photos) on the sd card.

    Riiiiiiiiiight.

    That whooshing sound you hear is ANOTHER goal post shift.

    MAGA Troll indeed. Make Android Good Anywayhecan.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 30 07:23:53 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Remember Virginia Slims cigarettes?
    Remember the marketing for them?

    Virginia Slims sold cigarettes by linking them to women's liberation...
    "You've come a long way, baby" was a cultural badge. Buying them became a symbol of female independence, empowerment and modern femininity.

    Apple does the same, but with tech. iPhones aren't just phones; they're
    status symbols of creativity, individuality, and missing hardware. Apple's
    ads rarely talk specs; they sell a lifestyle, a feeling, a tribe, where the shocking lack of basic hardware functionality is a badge of honor to them.

    To iPhone owners, it's "courageous" that their iPhones lack functionality.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 30 07:34:00 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    I study a lot of things - one of which is Apple - and the other is you.

    It's the paradox at the heart of Apple's philosophy that's interesting.
    None of you ignorant uneducated MAGA religious zealots understand Apple.

    Apple markets the severe loss of basic functionality as "innovation".
    Apple literally brands your sacrifice as being "courageous innovation".

    And you fall for it.
    Here's what's really going on:

    These features-headphone jacks, SD slots, even physical home buttons-are
    cheap, reliable, and loved. They "just work", which is my main point.

    Yet Apple removed them.
    Even though they worked just fine.

    But Apple doesn't sell functionality; Apple sells innovation & identity.
    Just like Virginia Slims marketing sold innovation & identity.

    To Apple marketing, it's innovation to remove basic functionality.
    Removing them serves a narrative of progress: wireless, minimalist, clean.

    But by eliminating familiar ports, Apple nudges users toward their
    ecosystem: AirPods, iCloud, dongles, adapters... all proprietary.

    Calling it "courage" was pure marketing spin.

    It reframed removing utility as a bold act of leadership, rather than what
    it was, which was a major loss in functionality & incredible inconvenience.

    It shifted the narrative: if you're frustrated, maybe you're just not ready
    for the "future." Maybe you're not rich enough to buy it back from Apple.

    It's deeply strategic and frankly, it's deceptively manipulative.

    But it works, because Apple fans often internalize the vision and
    reinterpret inconvenience as sophistication. They don't know any better.

    It's like if a fashion brand removed pockets from pants and said it's a "courageous design" even though people love pockets! But if enough people believe it's elegant, suddenly pockets are something to scoff at.

    This is why iPhones are shockingly devoid of basic hardware functionality.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Tyrone on Wed Jul 30 07:42:12 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:59:30 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    MAGA Troll indeed. Make Android Good Anywayhecan.

    I study you Apple MAGA trolls. And I study Apple's strategy.

    Specifically Apple's strategy of removing pockets from pants & then
    convincing people like you that it's "progress" to remove pockets (at the
    same time Apple sells you their proprietary replacement for the missing functionality).

    How does Apple get away with convincing you that pants without pockets are somehow progress - where you're forced to buy the lost functionality back?

    Apple doesn't just sell tech - it sells belief. And belief is powerful
    enough to override inconvenience, cost, and even common sense.

    Here's why people like you MAGA trolls don't comprehend the deception:

    Marketing is myth making. Apple frames the removal of most basic hardware functionality removals as "progress." No headphone jack? That's "courage."
    No charger in the box? That's "environmental responsibility." These aren't
    just excuses - they're Apple's trademarked narratives that make you MAGA
    trolls feel like they're part of something visionary.

    Tribe loyalty is at stake here. You MAGA trolls often form a kind of brand identity. Once you're in the ecosystem, questioning Apple feels like questioning your own taste or values. That's not deception; it's emotional engineering.

    And then there's design over function where Apple's aesthetic minimalism convinces people like you that fewer ports means more elegance. Even if it means buying dongles, adapters, or wireless accessories, the sleek look
    wins in your mind because Apple has convinced you that less is more.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Your Name on Wed Jul 30 07:46:22 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 09:39:18 +1200, Your Name wrote :


    And for the tiny minority that do need extra storage space, they can
    easily just plug in and use normal USB-C keyring drives or bigger
    capacity portable SSDs or hard drives.

    I study Apple. And I study you.

    Specifically, I study why you Apple MAGA zealots adapt so easily to Apple telling you that they removed all the basic hardware functionality for your
    own good. Apple tells you it's "courageous" for you to lack functionality.

    What you Apple MAGA trolls thrive on is the "social proof" you feel.

    When millions like you Apple religious zealots also adopt the losses
    without complaint, it creates a feedback loop: "If everyone's fine with it, maybe I'm just being picky." That's how normalization works.

    What you Apple trolls exhibit is the classic cognitive dissonance.
    Admitting you were tricked, especially after spending $1,000+, is painful.

    So people like you rationalize: "I didn't need that SD slot anyway." I'll
    just go buy the proprietary solutions Apple is offering me to replace the functionality that Apple doesn't provide in the iPhone.

    It's easier to believe Apple than to feel duped.

    And Apple's not alone. Other companies now copy this playbook. But Apple perfected it by turning removal into desire, and limitation into luxury.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David B.@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Jul 30 10:18:59 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 30/07/2025 08:42, Marion wrote:
    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:59:30 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    MAGA Troll indeed. Make Android Good Anywayhecan.

    I study you Apple MAGA trolls. And I study Apple's strategy.

    Specifically Apple's strategy of removing pockets from pants & then convincing people like you that it's "progress" to remove pockets (at the same time Apple sells you their proprietary replacement for the missing functionality).

    How does Apple get away with convincing you that pants without pockets are somehow progress - where you're forced to buy the lost functionality back?

    Apple doesn't just sell tech - it sells belief. And belief is powerful
    enough to override inconvenience, cost, and even common sense.

    Here's why people like you MAGA trolls don't comprehend the deception:

    Marketing is myth making. Apple frames the removal of most basic hardware functionality removals as "progress." No headphone jack? That's "courage."
    No charger in the box? That's "environmental responsibility." These aren't just excuses - they're Apple's trademarked narratives that make you MAGA trolls feel like they're part of something visionary.

    Tribe loyalty is at stake here. You MAGA trolls often form a kind of brand identity. Once you're in the ecosystem, questioning Apple feels like questioning your own taste or values. That's not deception; it's emotional engineering.

    And then there's design over function where Apple's aesthetic minimalism convinces people like you that fewer ports means more elegance. Even if it means buying dongles, adapters, or wireless accessories, the sleek look
    wins in your mind because Apple has convinced you that less is more.

    You are CORRECT, my friend! 🙂

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Jul 30 18:30:03 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote at 22:46 this Tuesday (GMT):
    [snip]
    Unlike tobacco products, you can't actually be addicted to a smartphone.

    So if Apple's products were bad, people wouldn't go on buying them.


    Smartphone addiction is the most common kind of addiction nowdays, I
    think.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Rod Speed on Wed Jul 30 19:18:23 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-30, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote
    Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote

    And yet, there's nothing the iPhone can do that Android doesn't do.

    [Fact check: This is false]

    So what are you claiming that an iphone can do that an android can't
    do apart from fill Apple's pockets ?

    Shut up, Robbie. iPhones can run an SMB server with the default
    privileged port, among other things. And that has absolutely nothing to
    do with filling Apple's pockets.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 31 09:30:43 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-30 18:30:03 +0000, candycanearter07 said:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote at 22:46 this Tuesday (GMT):
    [snip]

    Unlike tobacco products, you can't actually be addicted to a smartphone.

    So if Apple's products were bad, people wouldn't go on buying them.

    Smartphone addiction is the most common kind of addiction nowdays, I
    think.

    It definitely exists:

    "Phone addiction is the obsessive use of a smartphone.
    This behavioral addiction is often dubbed as 'nomophobia,'
    or the fear of being without a mobile device. People with
    a phone addiction may experience anxiety, agitation, and
    disorientation if they are unable to use their
    smartphone."
    <https://www.addictioncenter.com/behavioral-addictions/phone-addiction/>

    *Anything* you can think of will have someone who is addicted to it and
    someone else who is scared of it.


    There is a small, but growing, number of people ditching their
    smartphones for 'dumbphones' to escape the constant use and/or checking
    of social media. Perhaps surprisingly, many of these are young people.
    Some will be the same people who have gone back to buying vinyl
    records, music CDs, and DVDs of TV shows and movies.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Jul 31 09:46:35 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-30 00:34, Marion wrote:
    I study a lot of things - one of which is Apple - and the other is you.
    LOLOLOLLOLOLOL!

    That's just TOO FUNNY!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Thu Jul 31 09:47:13 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-30 00:42, Marion wrote:
    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:59:30 +0000, Tyrone wrote :


    MAGA Troll indeed. Make Android Good Anywayhecan.

    I study you Apple MAGA trolls.

    LOLOLOLLOLOLOL!

    That's just TOO FUNNY!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Rod Speed on Thu Jul 31 18:04:00 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-07-30, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 05:18:23 +1000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
    wrote:

    iPhones can run an SMB server with thedefault privileged port, among
    other things.

    So can android

    Wrong.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Chris on Fri Aug 1 02:23:22 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 21:21:07 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :


    In fact, we have a thread already on that topic where NOBODY could find a
    single thing that the iPhone does that Android doesn't already do, Chris.

    Your memory is failing you or your denialism is such that reality is a foreign country. You yourself admitted there was something an iphone could
    do that an android phone couldn't.

    I'll leave it for you to remember. It was only a few weeks ago.

    Well, Jolly Roger brought it up just now, so I will agree I was wrong.

    There is one thing unjailbroken iOS can do that Android cannot do.

    Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as for SMB. Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that Android can't do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Fri Aug 1 02:25:02 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 30 Jul 2025 19:18:23 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    iPhones can run an SMB server with the default
    privileged port, among other things. And that has absolutely nothing to
    do with filling Apple's pockets.

    Ah, yes. Thanks for jogging my memory. I've been trying to teach folks that there's nothing iOS can do that Android can't that I forgot about ports!

    You're right!
    I was wrong.

    I will agree with anyone who makes a logically sensible statement.
    Jolly Roger is correct. I was wrong. I apologize.

    There is one thing an unjailbroken iOS device can do that Android can't.

    It's true that unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Aug 1 15:19:35 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-01, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 21:21:07 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

    In fact, we have a thread already on that topic where NOBODY could find a >>> single thing that the iPhone does that Android doesn't already do, Chris. >>
    Your memory is failing you or your denialism is such that reality is a
    foreign country. You yourself admitted there was something an iphone could >> do that an android phone couldn't.

    I'll leave it for you to remember. It was only a few weeks ago.

    Well, Jolly Roger brought it up just now, so I will agree I was wrong.

    You're almost always wrong when it comes to Apple.

    So is Robbie.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Rod Speed on Fri Aug 1 15:18:39 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-01, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

    iPhones can run an SMB server with the default privileged port,
    among other things.

    So can android

    Wrong.

    Nope, dope

    You're an idiot. We've already discussed the FACT that Android cannot
    run an SMB server on the default port at length here, while iOS can.
    Marion (Arlen) claimed otherwise and was shown to be WRONG. And here you
    come weeks later trying to claim it can. You're a clown, Robbie. 🤣

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Aug 1 15:23:10 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-01, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On 30 Jul 2025 19:18:23 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

    privileged port, among other things. And that has absolutely nothing
    to do with filling Apple's pockets.

    Ah, yes. Thanks for jogging my memory. I've been trying to teach folks
    that there's nothing iOS can do that Android can't that I forgot about
    ports!

    You lost your memory that fast, eh? 🤣

    No worries, little Arlen. Pepperidge Farm always remembers. This isn't
    the first time you've been caught lying about Apple products, and it
    certainly won't be the last.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Chris on Fri Aug 1 15:20:02 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-01, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 21:21:07 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

    In fact, we have a thread already on that topic where NOBODY could find a >>>> single thing that the iPhone does that Android doesn't already do, Chris. >>>
    Your memory is failing you or your denialism is such that reality is a
    foreign country. You yourself admitted there was something an iphone could >>> do that an android phone couldn't.

    I'll leave it for you to remember. It was only a few weeks ago.

    Well, Jolly Roger brought it up just now, so I will agree I was wrong.

    There is one thing unjailbroken iOS can do that Android cannot do.

    Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as for SMB. >> Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that Android can't do.

    There are others...

    Of course there are. But trolls gotta troll.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Rod Speed on Fri Aug 1 08:49:25 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-01 08:28, Rod Speed wrote:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

    iPhones can run an SMB server with the default  privileged port,
    among  other things.

    So can android

    Wrong.

    Nope, dope

    You're an idiot.

    We'll see who the idiot is...

    We've already discussed the FACT that Android cannot  runan SMB server
    on the default port at length here, while iOS can.

    There was no discussion, just your stupid claim.

    A claim which was confirmed by numerous posters including myself.


    There isnt just one android either

    Name one.


    Marion (Arlen) claimed otherwise and was shown to be WRONG.

    Nope, claimed to be wrong, actially

    Shown to be wrong.

    I can post the screenshots again if you like.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Rod Speed on Fri Aug 1 16:32:27 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-01, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

    iPhones can run an SMB server with the default privileged port,
    among other things.

    So can android

    Wrong.

    Nope, dope

    You're an idiot.

    We'll see who the idiot is...

    Too late, little Robbie. It's already crystal clear to anyone who knows
    about this topic that you are the idiot here. Even trollboi Marion
    (Arlen) admits Android can't do this. Stay dumb, loser. 🤣

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Rod Speed on Fri Aug 1 16:09:11 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-01 16:07, Rod Speed wrote:
    On Sat, 02 Aug 2025 02:32:27 +1000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
    wrote:

    On 2025-08-01, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

    iPhones can run an SMB server with the default  privileged port, >>>>>>>> among other things.

    So can android

    Wrong.

    Nope, dope

    You're an idiot.

    We'll see who the idiot is...

    Too late, little Robbie.

    Nope, idiot Rojjy

    It's already crystal clear to anyone who knows
    about this topic that you are the idiot here. Even trollboi Marion
    (Arlen) admits Android can't do this. Stay dumb, loser. 🤣

    There isnt just one android, fuckwit

    But you'll never actually show one that can do it...

    ...right?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Rod Speed on Fri Aug 1 16:08:28 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-01 16:05, Rod Speed wrote:
    On Sat, 02 Aug 2025 01:49:25 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    On 2025-08-01 08:28, Rod Speed wrote:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

    iPhones can run an SMB server with the default  privileged port, >>>>>>>> among  other things.

    So can android

    Wrong.

    Nope, dope

    You're an idiot.
     We'll see who the idiot is...

    We've already discussed the FACT that Android cannot  runan SMB
    server on the default port at length here, while iOS can.
     There was no discussion, just your stupid claim.

    A claim which was confirmed by numerous posters including myself.

    Which stupidly ignores the fact that there isnt just one android

    Great.

    Show one that can do it.


     There isnt just one android either

    Name one.


    Marion (Arlen) claimed otherwise and was shown to be WRONG.
     Nope, claimed to be wrong, actially

    Shown to be wrong.

    Only with one android

    Prove it.


    I can post the screenshots again if you like.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sat Aug 2 00:19:53 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 1 Aug 2025 15:19:35 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    Well, Jolly Roger brought it up just now, so I will agree I was wrong.

    You're almost always wrong when it comes to Apple.

    Never think I'm anything like you Jolly Roger, as that is a mistake.
    I never would mind admitting when I'm wrong - because I'm an actual adult.

    My value added is that everyone can trust what I say is correct.
    And part of that trust is openly admitting when I'm wrong - which I did.

    You Apple trolls are nothing like me in that your ego doesn't allow that.
    Your ego is fragile because you've been told you're stupid your whole life.

    So don't ever make the mistake of assuming I'm anything like you trolls.

    As I said, there is one thing iOS can do that Android cannot do.
    And that is access ports below 1024 for servers such as for SMB.

    However...

    I can't name a single other thing though that iOS does that Android can't.
    Can you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Chris on Sat Aug 2 00:25:19 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 06:39:04 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :


    Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as for SMB. >> Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that Android can't do.

    There are others...

    Name it and we'll discuss it, which is what adults do on adult newsgroups.

    If you think there's another functionality other than servers on privileged ports that you feel iOS can do that Android can't do, just name it.

    Note that we're not talking about brand names but actual functionality.

    For example,nospam would tout AirDrop as a unique Apple feature for fast,
    local file sharing but Android has had a similar feature for years called Nearby Share (now evolving into Quick Share in collaboration with Samsung
    and Google).

    Yet many iPhone users still believe Android lacks this capability because
    Apple branded it so effectively and Android's version wasn't as heavily marketed.

    So name a functionality (not a brand name) you feel iOS can do that Android can't.

    Once you realize they won't exist, then you're ready to learn why.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Sat Aug 2 02:28:34 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-02, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On 1 Aug 2025 15:19:35 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

    Well, Jolly Roger brought it up just now, so I will agree I was
    wrong.

    You're almost always wrong when it comes to Apple.

    I never would mind admitting when I'm wrong

    Says the troll who repeatedly claimed it was impossible for iPhones to
    run SMB servers on default ports *long* after you were shown that's not
    the case - as you *always* do. Pretend all you want, but Pepperidge Farm remembers. 🤣

    I'm an actual adult.

    You're a man child troll who spends his every waking moment trolling
    newsgroups for products you hold a seething hatred for.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Sat Aug 2 02:29:22 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-02, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 06:39:04 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

    Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as
    for SMB. Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that
    Android can't do.

    There are others...

    Name it and I'll deny it and move the goal post around until you get
    tired of dealing with my bullshit and I declare "victory".

    FTFY

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Rod Speed on Sat Aug 2 02:26:06 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-01, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 02 Aug 2025 02:32:27 +1000, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
    wrote:
    On 2025-08-01, Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
    Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

    iPhones can run an SMB server with the default privileged port, >>>>>>>> among other things.

    So can android

    Wrong.

    Nope, dope

    You're an idiot.

    We'll see who the idiot is...

    Too late, little Robbie.

    Nope, idiot Rojjy

    It's already crystal clear to anyone who knows
    about this topic that you are the idiot here. Even trollboi Marion
    (Arlen) admits Android can't do this. Stay dumb, loser. 🤣

    There isnt just one android, fuckwit

    Then it should be easy for you to back up your claim with evidence, dip
    shit roo fucker.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sat Aug 2 17:33:52 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2 Aug 2025 02:28:34 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

    As I said, there is one thing iOS can do that Android cannot do.
    And that is access ports below 1024 for servers such as for SMB.
    However...
    I can't name a single other thing though that iOS does that Android can't. >> Can you?

    You're a man child troll who spends his every waking moment trolling newsgroups for products you hold a seething hatred for.

    The adults on this child-like Apple newsgroup will note that both Chris and Jolly Roger claimed there is something else iOS can do that Android can't.

    Yet, the response from those child-like Apple trolls was rather revealing. Nonetheless, the question is apropos for this iPhone & Apple related ng.

    Q: *What else do you feel iOS can do that Android doesn't already do?*
    A: ?

    Note: Once these Apple herd animals finally understand there's almost
    nothing that iOS can do that Android hasn't done long ago, then, & only
    then, they are ready to begin to understand Apple's strategy as to why.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Chris on Sat Aug 2 17:34:52 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 08:02:57 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :


    Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such as
    for SMB. Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can do that
    Android can't do.

    There are others...

    Name it and I'll deny it and move the goal post around until you get
    tired of dealing with my bullshit and I declare "victory".

    FTFY

    Accurate.

    For the adult record, neither Chris nor Jolly Roger have come up with a
    single item to back up their claim that "there are others" iOS can do.








    Understanding why iOS is so astoundingly limited is a key step in adults understanding Apple's strategy of designing iOS devices as dumb terminals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Chris on Mon Aug 4 00:05:04 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-03, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 08:02:57 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :

    Unjailbroken iOS can access ports below 1024 for servers, such
    as for SMB. Hence I fully agree there is this 1 thing iOS can
    do that Android can't do.

    There are others...

    Name it and I'll deny it and move the goal post around until you
    get tired of dealing with my bullshit and I declare "victory".

    FTFY

    Accurate.

    For the adult record, neither Chris nor Jolly Roger have come up with
    a single item to back up their claim that "there are others" iOS can
    do.


    FTR it is Arlen who famously makes unsubstantiated claims. Even when
    he's been routinely corrected, he continues with the same claims for
    weeks and months and years.

    True to form as described by JR Step 1 is denial.

    And his pathology is on display here 24/7 for anyone to see for
    themselves. It's no big secret how he operates. The guy is sick.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Fri Aug 8 23:05:55 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 4 Aug 2025 00:05:04 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    For the adult record, neither Chris nor Jolly Roger have come up with
    a single item to back up their claim that "there are others" iOS can
    do.


    FTR it is Arlen who famously makes unsubstantiated claims. Even when
    he's been routinely corrected, he continues with the same claims for
    weeks and months and years.

    True to form as described by JR Step 1 is denial.

    And his pathology is on display here 24/7 for anyone to see for
    themselves. It's no big secret how he operates. The guy is sick.

    Heh heh heh...

    The Apple trolls are deathly *afraid* of what amounts to a simple query:

    From: Marion <marion@facts.com>
    Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
    Subject: Is there really only one thing that iOS can do
    that Android can't do?
    Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 17:37:54 -0000 (UTC)
    Message-ID: <106lidi$6h7$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

    In previous threads, I've proven by my own detailed testing, that there
    is at least one thing non-jailbroken iOS can do which unrooted Android
    can't.

    But... is there anything else?


    Once you know the answer to that question, you know a lot about Apple's fundamental strategy of designing the iPhone as a crippled mobile device.

    But until you can answer that question, you don't know anything at all.
    Once you understand the answer, then I can begin to teach you why.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Sat Aug 9 16:32:45 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-08 16:05, Marion wrote:
    On 4 Aug 2025 00:05:04 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    For the adult record, neither Chris nor Jolly Roger have come up with
    a single item to back up their claim that "there are others" iOS can
    do.

    FTR it is Arlen who famously makes unsubstantiated claims. Even when
    he's been routinely corrected, he continues with the same claims for
    weeks and months and years.

    True to form as described by JR Step 1 is denial.
    And his pathology is on display here 24/7 for anyone to see for
    themselves. It's no big secret how he operates. The guy is sick.
    Heh heh heh...

    The Apple trolls are deathly*afraid* of what amounts to a simple query:

    From: Marion<marion@facts.com>
    Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
    Subject: Is there really only one thing that iOS can do
    that Android can't do?
    Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 17:37:54 -0000 (UTC)
    Message-ID:<106lidi$6h7$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

    In previous threads, I've proven by my own detailed testing, that there
    is at least one thing non-jailbroken iOS can do which unrooted Android
    can't.

    By YOUR testing, Arlen?

    LOL!

    You denied it over and over after multiple people told you it worked!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun Aug 10 00:13:37 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-09, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2025-08-08 16:05, Marion wrote:
    On 4 Aug 2025 00:05:04 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :

    For the adult record, neither Chris nor Jolly Roger have come up with >>>>> a single item to back up their claim that "there are others" iOS can >>>>> do.

    FTR it is Arlen who famously makes unsubstantiated claims. Even when
    he's been routinely corrected, he continues with the same claims for
    weeks and months and years.

    True to form as described by JR Step 1 is denial.
    And his pathology is on display here 24/7 for anyone to see for
    themselves. It's no big secret how he operates. The guy is sick.
    Heh heh heh...

    The Apple trolls are deathly*afraid* of what amounts to a simple query:

    From: Marion<marion@facts.com>
    Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
    Subject: Is there really only one thing that iOS can do
    that Android can't do?
    Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 17:37:54 -0000 (UTC)
    Message-ID:<106lidi$6h7$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

    In previous threads, I've proven by my own detailed testing, that there
    is at least one thing non-jailbroken iOS can do which unrooted Android
    can't.

    By YOUR testing, Arlen?

    LOL!

    You denied it over and over after multiple people told you it worked!

    And now he just pretends that never happened, right along with
    brainrotdude. The fascinating thing is they actually believe if they lie
    we'll all just magically forget about it as if it never happened. They
    actually believe people are as fucking dumb as they are. It's pathetic behavior.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Mon Aug 11 06:11:26 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 10 Aug 2025 00:13:37 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    And now he just pretends that never happened, right along with
    brainrotdude. The fascinating thing is they actually believe if they lie we'll all just magically forget about it as if it never happened. They actually believe people are as fucking dumb as they are. It's pathetic behavior.

    Heh heh heh...

    You Apple trolls *hate* that Apple sold you on a device that can't do much.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Mon Aug 11 10:04:24 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-08-10 23:11, Marion wrote:
    On 10 Aug 2025 00:13:37 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :


    And now he just pretends that never happened, right along with
    brainrotdude. The fascinating thing is they actually believe if they lie
    we'll all just magically forget about it as if it never happened. They
    actually believe people are as fucking dumb as they are. It's pathetic
    behavior.

    Heh heh heh...

    You Apple trolls *hate* that Apple sold you on a device that can't do much.

    What exactly is it that my device "can't do"?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)