I'm not sure if anyone from HPE still reads these. My
understanding is that HP-UX is shelved.
I'm curious if anyone on the Software Distributor team / Ignite UX
team has written the code in Python?
Will HPE opensource the Software Distributor source code? Red Hat yum/dnf/rpm strategy is lacking in many areas. Particularly it is
update and removal (no prerequisite, co-requisite, or ex-requisite).
I'd make an offer on the source SD-UX and Ignite source code.
In article <z3ednY6gDq-hqMv6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>,
paul@weber.net (Paul A. Weber) wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone from HPE still reads these. My
understanding is that HP-UX is shelved.
As you probably know, HP-UX 11i v3 and the IPF-based "Integrity" hardware reach the end of their support lives at the end of this month. All
previous versions of HP-UX and all the PA-RISC hardware have already left support. There's an overview here:
<https://www.stromasys.com/resources/hp-ux-end-of-support/>
Stromasys are keen to sell their PA-RISC emulation software, but they
don't have an emulator for IPF, and apparently nor does anyone else.
I'm curious if anyone on the Software Distributor team / Ignite UX
team has written the code in Python?
Will HPE opensource the Software Distributor source code? Red Hat
yum/dnf/rpm strategy is lacking in many areas. Particularly it is
update and removal (no prerequisite, co-requisite, or ex-requisite).
I'd make an offer on the source SD-UX and Ignite source code.
It's deeply unlikely HP are willing to spend the money on code review and lawyers that would be needed to open-source it.
John
On 12/9/2024 5:47 AM, John Dallman wrote:
In article <z3ednY6gDq-hqMv6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>,
paul@weber.net (Paul A. Weber) wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone from HPE still reads these. My
understanding is that HP-UX is shelved.
As you probably know, HP-UX 11i v3 and the IPF-based "Integrity" hardware reach the end of their support lives at the end of this month. All
previous versions of HP-UX and all the PA-RISC hardware have already left support. There's an overview here:
<https://www.stromasys.com/resources/hp-ux-end-of-support/>
Stromasys are keen to sell their PA-RISC emulation software, but they
don't have an emulator for IPF, and apparently nor does anyone else.
I'm curious if anyone on the Software Distributor team / Ignite UX
team has written the code in Python?
Will HPE opensource the Software Distributor source code? Red Hat
yum/dnf/rpm strategy is lacking in many areas. Particularly it is
update and removal (no prerequisite, co-requisite, or ex-requisite).
I'd make an offer on the source SD-UX and Ignite source code.
It's deeply unlikely HP are willing to spend the money on code review and lawyers that would be needed to open-source it.
Well I can't understand the short shortsightedness around porting
features of HP-UX to Linux. The margin on software is 75% or more. I'm
not talking about porting HP-UX to IA32. I'm talking about porting
software such as LVM, Advanced/Online JFS, Ignite, and SD-UX to Linux.
Red Hat LVM still has functionality (options such as mirroring) that are still (even at RHEL 9.x) Not ported.
So much revenue opportunity is being lost.
But it's not HP anymore.
It's Compaq.
Well I can't understand the short shortsightedness around porting
features of HP-UX to Linux. The margin on software is 75% or more.
I'm not talking about porting HP-UX to IA32. I'm talking about
porting software such as LVM, Advanced/Online JFS, Ignite, and
SD-UX to Linux.
So much revenue opportunity is being lost.
But it's not HP anymore. It's Compaq.
Paul A. Weber <paul@weber.net> wrote:
On 12/9/2024 5:47 AM, John Dallman wrote:
In article <z3ednY6gDq-hqMv6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>,Well I can't understand the short shortsightedness around porting
paul@weber.net (Paul A. Weber) wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone from HPE still reads these. My
understanding is that HP-UX is shelved.
As you probably know, HP-UX 11i v3 and the IPF-based "Integrity" hardware >>> reach the end of their support lives at the end of this month. All
previous versions of HP-UX and all the PA-RISC hardware have already left >>> support. There's an overview here:
<https://www.stromasys.com/resources/hp-ux-end-of-support/>
Stromasys are keen to sell their PA-RISC emulation software, but they
don't have an emulator for IPF, and apparently nor does anyone else.
I'm curious if anyone on the Software Distributor team / Ignite UX
team has written the code in Python?
Will HPE opensource the Software Distributor source code? Red Hat
yum/dnf/rpm strategy is lacking in many areas. Particularly it is
update and removal (no prerequisite, co-requisite, or ex-requisite).
I'd make an offer on the source SD-UX and Ignite source code.
It's deeply unlikely HP are willing to spend the money on code review and >>> lawyers that would be needed to open-source it.
features of HP-UX to Linux. The margin on software is 75% or more. I'm
not talking about porting HP-UX to IA32. I'm talking about porting
software such as LVM, Advanced/Online JFS, Ignite, and SD-UX to Linux.
Red Hat LVM still has functionality (options such as mirroring) that are
still (even at RHEL 9.x) Not ported.
I'm quite sure that both (HP-UX) LVM and Advanced/Online JFS are *not* owned by HP/HPE. I forgot the origin of (HP-UX) LVM (IBM? On AIX?). Advanced/Online JFS originates at VERITAS Software.
'Veritas File System'
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veritas_File_System>
So for that software, you're 'addressing' the wrong company.
So much revenue opportunity is being lost.
As John mentioned, it will only *cost* HP a lot of money. 'revenue'?
75% of 'free' is zero.
But it's not HP anymore.
It's Compaq.
Sorry to rain on your parade, But the Compaq brand hasn't be used by
HP since 2013. And the organization you're referring to, is HPE, Hewlett Packard Enterprise.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 547 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 71:34:56 |
Calls: | 10,398 |
Files: | 14,070 |
Messages: | 6,417,621 |