• Re: Adult observation iKooks are what they are - because - they HATE fa

    From badgolferman@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Fri Sep 2 00:55:24 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    What forum do you suggest I create an account on to run that test?

    https://discussions.apple.com/community/iphone

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burnelli@21:1/5 to RocketSurgeon on Fri Sep 2 02:21:28 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    RocketSurgeon wrote:

    Not bloody likely.

    The adult observation is not so much that the iKooks are driven by
    propaganda but by their inability to distinguish fact from fiction coupled
    with their ego being _directly_ tied to the size of Apple's profit margins.
    --
    Notice you need all _three_ traits to be an iKook; not just one or two.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg Lorenz@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 7 10:38:26 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Am 29.08.22 um 23:52 schrieb Andy Burnelli:
    The iKooks said we "bashed" Apple merely for _mentioning_ forks existed.
    Why?

    Arlen. You are a soliloquist. All these threads are fabricated by an
    acute schizophrenic personality.


    --
    Gutta cavat lapidem (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RocketSurgeon@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Tue Nov 8 20:04:09 2022
    On 11/6/22 5:50 PM, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Classic example of the iKook death spiral... protecting the deity.

    *iphone tracking settings* <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/GwOYi5dFQdI>

    Jolly Roger wrote:

     *Apple's iOS Devices Are Vulnerable to Location-Based Snooping*
     <https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/a-new-security-flaw-affects-15-billion-apple-ios-devices-puts-your-personal-information-at-risk.html>

     "A pair of security researchers pointed out the vulnerability   on
    January 2, 2020, submitting it to Apple"

    LOL... As is often the case with uneducated unintelligent trolls like
    Arlen, he skims over articles without having an actual understanding of
    what they are actually about

    Hi Jolly Roger, I understand you. I've studied you for many years, as
    you well know I have.

    Your whole life people have been calling you stupid.
    That's why you hate yourself.

    I get it.
    I really do.

    In a strange pitiful way, I'm sorry for you.
    In self defense, you call everyone else stupid.

    Just like you did above by calling me stupid.
    However, I'm ok that you called me stupid.
    My ego doesn't depend on you.
    More to the point, my ego doesn't depend on anything Apple does.

    Unfortunately for you, your ego is almost completely dependent on Apple. Apple is the only entity on this planet that doesn't call you stupid.

    Apple loves you.
    They really do.

    Tour ego is indelibly intertwined into the deity you respect more than
    all others: Apple, so that's why you lashed out at badgolferman and me.

    You are merely defending the only entity that does not call you stupid. Apple.

     *Why You Should Stop This 'Hidden' Location Tracking On Your iPhone*
    <https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2020/10/04/apple-iphone-12-location-tracking-in-ios-14-upgrade/>

       As ESET cyber guru Jake Moore warns, "significant locations is one
       of those features ... I cannot think of a positive or useful reason >>>    why Apple would include this feature on any of their devices."

    Then Jake has no imagination and/or is clueless about the iPhone.

    Hmmm... could it possibly be _you_ who is clueless? Naaaah... can't be you. Must be all the experts.

    Hmmm... cyber gurus and security experts are saying the little
    functionality that it provides isn't worth the loss in privacy that
    can be
    expected to occur now, and in the future (since you will never know).

    Nonsense. The data is end-to-end encrypted and cannot be accessed by
    third parties including Apple. You're fear mongering as usual, and its
    lame. You're also a dumb ass troll.

    Again, I understand why you can't respond to any facts about your deity without calling every fact a lie, a troll, fear mongering, etc.

    Your whole life people have been calling you stupid, Jolly Roger.
    Except Apple.

    Apple loves you.
    Therefore you defend Apple to the death, no matter what.

    Otherwise, what would you be after all?

    You're a real clanger.

    Perfect script for yourself!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Thu Dec 15 19:56:35 2022
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2022-12-15 19:49, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    I just proved, beyond any doubt...

    ...that you're so obsessed with yourself that you have to post these
    missives twice?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to spam@nospam.com on Sun Jan 22 15:37:26 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    In article <tqk5vp$16ur$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    Who _lies_ that brazenly?
    Who _lies_ that repeatedly?
    Who has _never_ admitted his lies, even after we proved them beyond doubt?

    what reflective surfaces do you have in close proximity?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From cris@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Mar 2 16:34:29 2023
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 02/03/2023 08:30, Alan Browne wrote:

    Everyone who replies to it is giving it "robust psychological support".

    That you use it means he's right about you being always childish.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joanna mcarthur@21:1/5 to Andy Burnelli on Fri Mar 10 21:27:01 2023
    On Monday, August 29, 2022 at 2:51:56 PM UTC-7, Andy Burnelli wrote:
    The iKooks said we "bashed" Apple merely for _mentioning_ forks existed. Why?

    In a recent thread, the iKooks denied what was in fact a fact about the resource fork and data fork inherent in setting up comparability between
    the SunOS/Solaris + Windows + Mac corporate environments of the past.
    Samba + CIFs/SMB + CAP

    I started to wonder why the Apple iKooks deny all facts about Apple, even these facts about the data & resource fork which nobody normal would deny.

    *iKooks said we "bashed" Apple merely for _mentioning_ forks existed*

    I wondered... why do these rather strange people always think merely mentioning facts about Apple is bashing Apple... when it dawned on me...

    *These iKooks _hate_ Apple designed that resource + data fork system.*

    Hence, to an iKook, _any_ fact about Apple, that they hate (which is a
    _lot_ of facts indeed), they consider "bashing" Apple.

    Strange people indeed they are.
    They _hate_ what Apple is.

    Merely mentioning even well-known facts about Apple is what they hate most.
    hi I'm horny!!!1

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)