• [NEWS] Apple releases M3 MacBook Air models

    From Your Name@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 5 13:15:28 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.misc

    New models of a Mac that is rather pointless. It's now even less
    differentiated from the MacBook Pro models. Apple should just drop the
    "Air" and "Pro" names and have a single "MacBook" product line. :-\


    Apple Announces New MacBook Air Models With M3 Chip
    <https://www.macrumors.com/2024/03/04/apple-announces-m3-macbook-air/>

    Apple Quietly Releases New M3 MacBook Air Lineup

    <https://www.idropnews.com/news/apple-quietly-releases-new-m3-macbook-air-lineup/209627/>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dgb (David@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Tue Mar 5 20:42:04 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.misc

    On 5 Mar 2024 at 19:52:40 GMT, "Alan Browne" <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    Since I have an M3 iMac and it uses more memory for the same load of
    apps compared to my i7 iMac, my understanding of it exceeds yours on
    this - as it does on most subjects.

    I have 27 inch iMac. I've looked and played with a new M3 iMac in our local Apple Store.

    When you have each one of them there in front of you, regardless of the technicalities, which screen do you prefer to be sitting in front of? How does each make you /feel/ please?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dgb (David@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Wed Mar 6 21:40:42 2024
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 16:23:38 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 04:45:43 GMT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    The current reports say Apple are not planning on making a new 27in
    iMac or iMac Pro any time soon. There are dubious rumours that pop up
    from time to time, including going to 32in iMac.

    That is my understanding too.

    You could of course buy a Mac Mini or Mac Studio and add whatever
    screen size you want. Not an "all-in-one", but depending on the
    screen's base or using a display stand, it can almost be.

    My Professor friend has done exactly that! The Studio Display is just
    wonderful - but expensive!

    Best display I've ever owned. I have it sitting next to a 5K LG
    UltraFine display, and it's striking how much better the Studio Display
    is in just about every way: color accuracy, viewing angle, backlight consistency, overall build quality, audio quality, and camera quality.
    It's worth every penny I paid for it.

    Thank you. That's really good to know. :-)

    With iCloud storage being relatively cheap, there's no (apparent) need
    to have lots of on-board storage nowadays.

    Personally, I can't really function without at least 2 TB of internal storage, but I know I'm not representative of the average user.

    Is it possible for you to explain, in simple terms, why you need so much internal storage rather than using the iCloud to be a storage place of choice. (I'm assuming you have a really good Internet connection.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Your Name on Wed Mar 6 15:01:51 2024
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 21:40:42 +0000, dgb (David) said:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 16:23:38 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com>
    wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 04:45:43 GMT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com>
    wrote:

    The current reports say Apple are not planning on making a new 27in
    iMac or iMac Pro any time soon. There are dubious rumours that pop up >>>>> from time to time, including going to 32in iMac.

    That is my understanding too.

    You could of course buy a Mac Mini or Mac Studio and add whatever
    screen size you want. Not an "all-in-one", but depending on the
    screen's base or using a display stand, it can almost be.

    My Professor friend has done exactly that!  The Studio Display is just >>>> wonderful - but expensive!

    Best display I've ever owned. I have it sitting next to a 5K LG
    UltraFine display, and it's striking how much better the Studio Display
    is in just about every way: color accuracy, viewing angle, backlight
    consistency, overall build quality, audio quality, and camera quality.
    It's worth every penny I paid for it.

    Thank you. That's really good to know. :-)

    With iCloud storage being relatively cheap, there's no (apparent) need >>>> to have lots of on-board storage nowadays.

    Personally, I can't really function without at least 2 TB of internal
    storage, but I know I'm not representative of the average user.

    Is it possible for you to explain, in simple terms, why you need so much
    internal storage rather than using the iCloud to be a storage place of
    choice.
    (I'm assuming you have a really good Internet connection.)

    Personally I would never use cloud storage.

    Additional external USB drives are fine for most people, but if you're
    doing high-end graphics or video work, then external Thunderbolt or more internal storage would be better since it's a bit faster.

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps
    since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 7 11:59:46 2024
    On 2024-03-06 21:40:42 +0000, dgb (David) said:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 16:23:38 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 04:45:43 GMT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: >>>
    The current reports say Apple are not planning on making a new 27in
    iMac or iMac Pro any time soon. There are dubious rumours that pop up
    from time to time, including going to 32in iMac.

    That is my understanding too.

    You could of course buy a Mac Mini or Mac Studio and add whatever
    screen size you want. Not an "all-in-one", but depending on the
    screen's base or using a display stand, it can almost be.

    My Professor friend has done exactly that! The Studio Display is just
    wonderful - but expensive!

    Best display I've ever owned. I have it sitting next to a 5K LG
    UltraFine display, and it's striking how much better the Studio Display
    is in just about every way: color accuracy, viewing angle, backlight
    consistency, overall build quality, audio quality, and camera quality.
    It's worth every penny I paid for it.

    Thank you. That's really good to know. :-)

    With iCloud storage being relatively cheap, there's no (apparent) need
    to have lots of on-board storage nowadays.

    Personally, I can't really function without at least 2 TB of internal
    storage, but I know I'm not representative of the average user.

    Is it possible for you to explain, in simple terms, why you need so much internal storage rather than using the iCloud to be a storage place of choice.
    (I'm assuming you have a really good Internet connection.)

    Personally I would never use cloud storage.

    Additional external USB drives are fine for most people, but if you're
    doing high-end graphics or video work, then external Thunderbolt or
    more internal storage would be better since it's a bit faster.

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps
    since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard
    system Applications folder.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Mar 7 01:04:36 2024
    On 2024-03-06, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps
    since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard
    system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    I'd be willing to bet Adobe's Creative Cloud apps don't like being
    anywhere but their designated place in /Applications.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to dgb on Thu Mar 7 01:03:05 2024
    On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 16:23:38 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 04:45:43 GMT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: >>>
    The current reports say Apple are not planning on making a new 27in
    iMac or iMac Pro any time soon. There are dubious rumours that pop
    up from time to time, including going to 32in iMac.

    That is my understanding too.

    You could of course buy a Mac Mini or Mac Studio and add whatever
    screen size you want. Not an "all-in-one", but depending on the
    screen's base or using a display stand, it can almost be.

    My Professor friend has done exactly that! The Studio Display is
    just wonderful - but expensive!

    Best display I've ever owned. I have it sitting next to a 5K LG
    UltraFine display, and it's striking how much better the Studio
    Display is in just about every way: color accuracy, viewing angle,
    backlight consistency, overall build quality, audio quality, and
    camera quality. It's worth every penny I paid for it.

    Thank you. That's really good to know. :-)

    With iCloud storage being relatively cheap, there's no (apparent)
    need to have lots of on-board storage nowadays.

    Personally, I can't really function without at least 2 TB of internal
    storage, but I know I'm not representative of the average user.

    Is it possible for you to explain, in simple terms, why you need so
    much internal storage rather than using the iCloud to be a storage
    place of choice. (I'm assuming you have a really good Internet
    connection.)

    iCloud isn't an alternate storage location the way you are suggesting.

    iCloud's primary purpose is synchronizing content between all of your
    devices. If you add a file to iCloud, it is automatically synced
    (transferred) to all of your other devices. If you delete something from
    one device, it gets deleted from all of your other devices and iCloud.
    There are more suitable services available for generic cloud file
    storage.

    I don't store my entire photo library in iCloud. Doing so would cause me
    to pay a monthly or yearly subscription, and I'm not interested in doing
    that when I have lots of storage right on my Mac.

    I have multiple virtual machines, Docker containers, video editing
    projects, and lots of other things on my Mac that simply aren't suitable
    for cloud storage.

    I back up my Apple mobile devices to my computer rather than the cloud.

    The list goes on...

    Like I said, I realize my needs aren't representative of most users. And
    I don't mind paying for more internal storage on my Macs.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?=@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Mar 6 18:25:58 2024
    On 2024-03-06 18:17, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 17:04, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps
    since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard
    system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    I'd be willing to bet Adobe's Creative Cloud apps don't like being
    anywhere but their designated place in /Applications.


    How much?

    To be fair, I just moved Adobe Illustrator 2023 (and it's entire folder
    to be sure) from Applications to my Desktop folder...

    ...and it seems to work fine.

    But will creative cloud continue to notify you when updates are
    available? It looks at /Applications to see which software you have
    installed.

    Same goes for anything obtained from the App Store -- remove them from /Applications and the App Store will no longer notify you that updates
    are available since it won't seem them as being installed.

    André

    --
    To email remove 'invalid' & replace 'gm' with well known Google mail
    service.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Wed Mar 6 17:17:01 2024
    On 2024-03-06 17:04, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps
    since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard
    system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    I'd be willing to bet Adobe's Creative Cloud apps don't like being
    anywhere but their designated place in /Applications.


    How much?

    To be fair, I just moved Adobe Illustrator 2023 (and it's entire folder
    to be sure) from Applications to my Desktop folder...

    ...and it seems to work fine.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 17:29:40 2024
    On 2024-03-06 17:25, André G. Isaak wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 18:17, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 17:04, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps >>>>> since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard
    system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    I'd be willing to bet Adobe's Creative Cloud apps don't like being
    anywhere but their designated place in /Applications.


    How much?

    To be fair, I just moved Adobe Illustrator 2023 (and it's entire
    folder to be sure) from Applications to my Desktop folder...

    ...and it seems to work fine.

    But will creative cloud continue to notify you when updates are
    available? It looks at /Applications to see which software you have installed.

    Are you sure about that?


    Same goes for anything obtained from the App Store -- remove them from /Applications and the App Store will no longer notify you that updates
    are available since it won't seem them as being installed.

    Really? Show it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Mar 7 03:58:26 2024
    On 2024-03-07, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 17:04, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps
    since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard
    system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    I'd be willing to bet Adobe's Creative Cloud apps don't like being
    anywhere but their designated place in /Applications.


    How much?

    To be fair, I just moved Adobe Illustrator 2023 (and it's entire folder
    to be sure) from Applications to my Desktop folder...

    ...and it seems to work fine.

    :-)

    Report back to use after it has (or hasn't) updated correctly.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dgb (David@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Mar 7 09:33:18 2024
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 01:03:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 16:23:38 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>> On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 04:45:43 GMT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: >>>>
    The current reports say Apple are not planning on making a new 27in
    iMac or iMac Pro any time soon. There are dubious rumours that pop
    up from time to time, including going to 32in iMac.

    That is my understanding too.

    You could of course buy a Mac Mini or Mac Studio and add whatever
    screen size you want. Not an "all-in-one", but depending on the
    screen's base or using a display stand, it can almost be.

    My Professor friend has done exactly that! The Studio Display is
    just wonderful - but expensive!

    Best display I've ever owned. I have it sitting next to a 5K LG
    UltraFine display, and it's striking how much better the Studio
    Display is in just about every way: color accuracy, viewing angle,
    backlight consistency, overall build quality, audio quality, and
    camera quality. It's worth every penny I paid for it.

    Thank you. That's really good to know. :-)

    With iCloud storage being relatively cheap, there's no (apparent)
    need to have lots of on-board storage nowadays.

    Personally, I can't really function without at least 2 TB of internal
    storage, but I know I'm not representative of the average user.

    Is it possible for you to explain, in simple terms, why you need so
    much internal storage rather than using the iCloud to be a storage
    place of choice. (I'm assuming you have a really good Internet
    connection.)

    iCloud isn't an alternate storage location the way you are suggesting.

    iCloud's primary purpose is synchronizing content between all of your devices. If you add a file to iCloud, it is automatically synced (transferred) to all of your other devices. If you delete something from
    one device, it gets deleted from all of your other devices and iCloud.
    There are more suitable services available for generic cloud file
    storage.

    I don't think that is right. I believe iCloud can and does store material without necessarily sending it to other Apple devices.

    I don't store my entire photo library in iCloud. Doing so would cause me
    to pay a monthly or yearly subscription, and I'm not interested in doing
    that when I have lots of storage right on my Mac.

    I do store all of my photo library on iCloud and I'm happy to pay a small monthly fee.

    I have multiple virtual machines, Docker containers, video editing
    projects, and lots of other things on my Mac that simply aren't suitable
    for cloud storage.

    OK - thanks for explaining.

    I've learned something new today! https://www.docker.com/resources/what-container/

    I back up my Apple mobile devices to my computer rather than the cloud.

    I glibly accept Apple's free service which seems to work as designed. Setting up a new iPhone nowadays is a doddle! Just place the new one next to the old one and "voilà - it's done!

    HOW do you back up your mobile devices to your computer?

    The list goes on...

    Like I said, I realize my needs aren't representative of most users. And
    I don't mind paying for more internal storage on my Macs.

    Understood. Thank you for taking the trouble to respond.

    --
    David

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alrescha@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Mar 7 15:47:08 2024
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    iCloud isn't an alternate storage location the way you are suggesting.

    The default setting isn’t the only setting. You can have a device with 128 GB of storage and 2 TB of data in iCloud if that’s what you want.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dgb (David@21:1/5 to Alrescha on Thu Mar 7 15:53:28 2024
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 15:47:08 GMT, "Alrescha" <news@alrescha.com> wrote:

    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    iCloud isn't an alternate storage location the way you are suggesting.

    The default setting isn’t the only setting. You can have a device with 128 GB of storage and 2 TB of data in iCloud if that’s what you want.

    That is my understanding too! :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alrescha on Thu Mar 7 16:50:38 2024
    On 2024-03-07, Alrescha <news@alrescha.com> wrote:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    iCloud isn't an alternate storage location the way you are
    suggesting.

    The default setting isn’t the only setting. You can have a device
    with 128 GB of storage and 2 TB of data in iCloud if that’s what you
    want.

    Not arbitrarily, no.

    For instance, with iCloud Photos you can store more data in your iCloud
    account than will fit on a given device. You can enabled Optimized
    Storage to make more space available on your device by storing
    low-resolution copies of the remaining photos on it, where
    full-resolution photos are downloaded as needed.

    But you can't upload 500 GB of photos to iCloud and not have them on any
    of your devices because iCloud isn't an alternate generic cloud storage solution you can use in that manner. And that's because it's primary
    purpose is data synchronization between all of your devices.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to dgb on Thu Mar 7 16:42:05 2024
    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 01:03:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    iCloud isn't an alternate storage location the way you are
    suggesting.

    iCloud's primary purpose is synchronizing content between all of your
    devices. If you add a file to iCloud, it is automatically synced
    (transferred) to all of your other devices. If you delete something
    from one device, it gets deleted from all of your other devices and
    iCloud. There are more suitable services available for generic cloud
    file storage.

    I don't think that is right.

    It is right that's iCloud's primary purpose is synchronization.

    I believe iCloud can and does store material without necessarily
    sending it to other Apple devices.

    That's not its primary purpose though. As exampled, photos, contacts, reminders, calendars, iCloud Drive documents, app settings, and so on
    are all synchronized between all of your devices. Add one and it appears
    on all of your devices. Remove one from one device, and it gets removed
    from iCloud and your other devices.

    I don't store my entire photo library in iCloud. Doing so would cause
    me to pay a monthly or yearly subscription, and I'm not interested in
    doing that when I have lots of storage right on my Mac.

    I do store all of my photo library on iCloud and I'm happy to pay a
    small monthly fee.

    Nothing wrong with that. It's good to have choices.

    I have multiple virtual machines, Docker containers, video editing
    projects, and lots of other things on my Mac that simply aren't
    suitable for cloud storage.

    OK - thanks for explaining.

    I've learned something new today! https://www.docker.com/resources/what-container/

    I back up my Apple mobile devices to my computer rather than the
    cloud.

    I glibly accept Apple's free service which seems to work as designed.
    Setting up a new iPhone nowadays is a doddle! Just place the new one
    next to the old one and "voilà - it's done!

    HOW do you back up your mobile devices to your computer?

    Apple has instructions on their website, which you can find with quick
    web search for "back up iphone".

    The list goes on...

    Like I said, I realize my needs aren't representative of most users.
    And I don't mind paying for more internal storage on my Macs.

    Understood. Thank you for taking the trouble to respond.

    Sure.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dgb (David@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Mar 7 20:26:59 2024
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 16:42:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 01:03:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>
    iCloud isn't an alternate storage location the way you are
    suggesting.

    iCloud's primary purpose is synchronizing content between all of your
    devices. If you add a file to iCloud, it is automatically synced
    (transferred) to all of your other devices. If you delete something
    from one device, it gets deleted from all of your other devices and
    iCloud. There are more suitable services available for generic cloud
    file storage.

    I don't think that is right.

    It is right that's iCloud's primary purpose is synchronization.

    OK - Being able to take a photograph on my iPhone and have the image almost instantly available on my iMac and iPad is one of the best aspects of using Apple.

    I believe iCloud can and does store material without necessarily
    sending it to other Apple devices.

    That's not its primary purpose though. As exampled, photos, contacts, reminders, calendars, iCloud Drive documents, app settings, and so on
    are all synchronized between all of your devices. Add one and it appears
    on all of your devices. Remove one from one device, and it gets removed
    from iCloud and your other devices.

    I totally accept that!

    However, I can store any other item I wish.

    I don't store my entire photo library in iCloud. Doing so would cause
    me to pay a monthly or yearly subscription, and I'm not interested in
    doing that when I have lots of storage right on my Mac.

    I do store all of my photo library on iCloud and I'm happy to pay a
    small monthly fee.

    Nothing wrong with that. It's good to have choices.

    Agreed. :-)

    I have multiple virtual machines, Docker containers, video editing
    projects, and lots of other things on my Mac that simply aren't
    suitable for cloud storage.

    OK - thanks for explaining.

    I've learned something new today!
    https://www.docker.com/resources/what-container/

    I back up my Apple mobile devices to my computer rather than the
    cloud.

    I glibly accept Apple's free service which seems to work as designed.
    Setting up a new iPhone nowadays is a doddle! Just place the new one
    next to the old one and "voilà - it's done!

    HOW do you back up your mobile devices to your computer?

    Apple has instructions on their website, which you can find with quick
    web search for "back up iphone".

    Thank you! https://support.apple.com/en-gb/guide/iphone/iph3ecf67d29/ios

    The list goes on...

    Like I said, I realize my needs aren't representative of most users.
    And I don't mind paying for more internal storage on my Macs.

    Understood. Thank you for taking the trouble to respond.

    Sure.

    I meant it! ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to dgb on Thu Mar 7 21:32:54 2024
    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 16:42:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 01:03:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>
    iCloud isn't an alternate storage location the way you are
    suggesting.

    iCloud's primary purpose is synchronizing content between all of
    your devices. If you add a file to iCloud, it is automatically
    synced (transferred) to all of your other devices. If you delete
    something from one device, it gets deleted from all of your other
    devices and iCloud. There are more suitable services available for
    generic cloud file storage.

    I don't think that is right.

    It is right that's iCloud's primary purpose is synchronization.

    OK - Being able to take a photograph on my iPhone and have the image
    almost instantly available on my iMac and iPad is one of the best
    aspects of using Apple.

    I believe iCloud can and does store material without necessarily
    sending it to other Apple devices.

    That's not its primary purpose though. As exampled, photos, contacts,
    reminders, calendars, iCloud Drive documents, app settings, and so on
    are all synchronized between all of your devices. Add one and it
    appears on all of your devices. Remove one from one device, and it
    gets removed from iCloud and your other devices.

    I totally accept that!

    However, I can store any other item I wish.

    Yes, but the default behavior is if you delete it, it gets deleted from
    your other devices.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Alrescha on Fri Mar 8 11:18:58 2024
    On 2024-03-07 15:47:08 +0000, Alrescha said:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    iCloud isn't an alternate storage location the way you are suggesting.

    The default setting isn’t the only setting. You can have a device with 128 GB of storage and 2 TB of data in iCloud if that’s what you want.

    iCloud definitely *is* a storage option, Apple even says so:

    "Store, organize and collaborate on files and folders
    with iCloud Drive. Easily upload, delete or recover
    files."

    iCloud, if you use the syncing options, is not is a backup solution
    though. It's too easy for a file / photo to be deleted from a device
    and then it disppears from all your devices (although there is a grace
    period where you can get it back).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dgb (David@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Mar 7 22:24:20 2024
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 21:32:54 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 16:42:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>> On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 01:03:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>>
    iCloud isn't an alternate storage location the way you are
    suggesting.

    iCloud's primary purpose is synchronizing content between all of
    your devices. If you add a file to iCloud, it is automatically
    synced (transferred) to all of your other devices. If you delete
    something from one device, it gets deleted from all of your other
    devices and iCloud. There are more suitable services available for
    generic cloud file storage.

    I don't think that is right.

    It is right that's iCloud's primary purpose is synchronization.

    OK - Being able to take a photograph on my iPhone and have the image
    almost instantly available on my iMac and iPad is one of the best
    aspects of using Apple.

    I believe iCloud can and does store material without necessarily
    sending it to other Apple devices.

    That's not its primary purpose though. As exampled, photos, contacts,
    reminders, calendars, iCloud Drive documents, app settings, and so on
    are all synchronized between all of your devices. Add one and it
    appears on all of your devices. Remove one from one device, and it
    gets removed from iCloud and your other devices.

    I totally accept that!

    However, I can store any other item I wish.

    Yes, but the default behavior is if you delete it, it gets deleted from
    your other devices.

    Perhaps you are not aware of changes made to iCloud.

    If you put Documents into iCloud, they are not added to iPhone and/or iPad.

    See:- https://i.ibb.co/ZfPsSjg/Screenshot-2024-03-07-at-22-19-10.png

    HTH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Your Name on Thu Mar 7 17:22:33 2024
    On 2024-03-06 17:59, Your Name wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 21:40:42 +0000, dgb (David) said:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 16:23:38 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com>
    wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 04:45:43 GMT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com>
    wrote:

    The current reports say Apple are not planning on making a new 27in
    iMac or iMac Pro any time soon. There are dubious rumours that pop up >>>>> from time to time, including going to 32in iMac.

    That is my understanding too.

    You could of course buy a Mac Mini or Mac Studio and add whatever
    screen size you want. Not an "all-in-one", but depending on the
    screen's base or using a display stand, it can almost be.

    My Professor friend has done exactly that!  The Studio Display is just >>>> wonderful - but expensive!

    Best display I've ever owned. I have it sitting next to a 5K LG
    UltraFine display, and it's striking how much better the Studio Display
    is in just about every way: color accuracy, viewing angle, backlight
    consistency, overall build quality, audio quality, and camera quality.
    It's worth every penny I paid for it.

    Thank you. That's really good to know. :-)

    With iCloud storage being relatively cheap, there's no (apparent) need >>>> to have lots of on-board storage nowadays.

    Personally, I can't really function without at least 2 TB of internal
    storage, but I know I'm not representative of the average user.

    Is it possible for you to explain, in simple terms, why you need so much
    internal storage rather than using the iCloud to be a storage place of
    choice.
    (I'm assuming you have a really good Internet connection.)

    Personally I would never use cloud storage.

    Why not? It's very convenient to have some data available at multiple
    places at any time.

    Just don't treat it as a backup.

    My business "daily" ops data is always on cloud. Just not backed up there.


    Additional external USB drives are fine for most people, but if you're
    doing high-end graphics or video work, then external Thunderbolt or more internal storage would be better since it's a bit faster.

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps
    since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard system Applications folder.

    Most apps don't matter where they are run from. The executable can be
    on volume x while the user data is on volume y. Large commercial,
    complex apps, esp. with a license, will often be different of course.

    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Mar 7 17:23:46 2024
    On 2024-03-06 18:01, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 21:40:42 +0000, dgb (David) said:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 16:23:38 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com>
    wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 04:45:43 GMT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com>
    wrote:

    The current reports say Apple are not planning on making a new 27in >>>>>> iMac or iMac Pro any time soon. There are dubious rumours that pop up >>>>>> from time to time, including going to 32in iMac.

    That is my understanding too.

    You could of course buy a Mac Mini or Mac Studio and add whatever
    screen size you want. Not an "all-in-one", but depending on the
    screen's base or using a display stand, it can almost be.

    My Professor friend has done exactly that!  The Studio Display is just >>>>> wonderful - but expensive!

    Best display I've ever owned. I have it sitting next to a 5K LG
    UltraFine display, and it's striking how much better the Studio Display >>>> is in just about every way: color accuracy, viewing angle, backlight
    consistency, overall build quality, audio quality, and camera quality. >>>> It's worth every penny I paid for it.

    Thank you. That's really good to know. :-)

    With iCloud storage being relatively cheap, there's no (apparent) need >>>>> to have lots of on-board storage nowadays.

    Personally, I can't really function without at least 2 TB of internal
    storage, but I know I'm not representative of the average user.

    Is it possible for you to explain, in simple terms, why you need so much >>> internal storage rather than using the iCloud to be a storage place
    of choice.
    (I'm assuming you have a really good Internet connection.)

    Personally I would never use cloud storage.

    Additional external USB drives are fine for most people, but if you're
    doing high-end graphics or video work, then external Thunderbolt or
    more internal storage would be better since it's a bit faster.

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps
    since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard
    system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    Shouldn't matter, but I doubt a licensed install of, eg, Photoshop
    would work very well.

    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Mar 7 17:25:35 2024
    On 2024-03-06 20:17, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 17:04, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps
    since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard
    system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    I'd be willing to bet Adobe's Creative Cloud apps don't like being
    anywhere but their designated place in /Applications.


    How much?

    To be fair, I just moved Adobe Illustrator 2023 (and it's entire folder
    to be sure) from Applications to my Desktop folder...

    ...and it seems to work fine.

    :-)

    And where does the license credential reside?

    Can you now connect that external drive to a different Mac and run it
    with the license credentials in effect?

    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 7 17:27:39 2024
    On 2024-03-07 04:33, dgb (David) wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 01:03:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:


    I don't store my entire photo library in iCloud. Doing so would cause me
    to pay a monthly or yearly subscription, and I'm not interested in doing
    that when I have lots of storage right on my Mac.

    I do store all of my photo library on iCloud and I'm happy to pay a small monthly fee.

    Yeesh! I do hope you have separate copies on physical media that you
    can access.

    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dgb (David@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Mar 7 22:39:41 2024
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 22:27:39 GMT, "Alan Browne" <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-07 04:33, dgb (David) wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 01:03:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>

    I don't store my entire photo library in iCloud. Doing so would cause me >>> to pay a monthly or yearly subscription, and I'm not interested in doing >>> that when I have lots of storage right on my Mac.

    I do store all of my photo library on iCloud and I'm happy to pay a small
    monthly fee.

    Yeesh! I do hope you have separate copies on physical media that you
    can access.

    In the days of photographs taken with a camera I have physically printed copies. I also have dozens of CD's containing what I considered 'important' photographs.
    With the advent of the iPhone and Apple's iCloud I make do with nothing more than Time Machine backups. Try as I might, I cannot envisage Apple failing to keep my images safe in their iCloud.
    If that makes you cringe, please tell me why!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to dgb on Thu Mar 7 23:04:03 2024
    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 21:32:54 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 16:42:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    I believe iCloud can and does store material without necessarily
    sending it to other Apple devices.

    That's not its primary purpose though. As exampled, photos,
    contacts, reminders, calendars, iCloud Drive documents, app
    settings, and so on are all synchronized between all of your
    devices. Add one and it appears on all of your devices. Remove one
    from one device, and it gets removed from iCloud and your other
    devices.

    I totally accept that!

    However, I can store any other item I wish.

    Yes, but the default behavior is if you delete it, it gets deleted
    from your other devices.

    Perhaps you are not aware of changes made to iCloud.

    If you put Documents into iCloud, they are not added to iPhone and/or
    iPad.

    See:- https://i.ibb.co/ZfPsSjg/Screenshot-2024-03-07-at-22-19-10.png

    No, that's incorrect. iCloud Drive is not a generic cloud file storage
    service. Things you add to iCloud Drive are made available to all of the
    Apple devices that are logged in with the same Apple ID.

    Apple's webpage about it:

    <https://support.apple.com/en-us/109344>

    Go ahead and try it for yourself. 😉

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Your Name on Thu Mar 7 22:58:37 2024
    On 2024-03-07, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-07 15:47:08 +0000, Alrescha said:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    iCloud isn't an alternate storage location the way you are
    suggesting.

    The default setting isn’t the only setting. You can have a device
    with 128 GB of storage and 2 TB of data in iCloud if that’s what you
    want.

    iCloud definitely *is* a storage option, Apple even says so:

    "Store, organize and collaborate on files and folders with iCloud
    Drive. Easily upload, delete or recover files."

    You're playing word games. What you store on iCloud Drive is also
    synchronized to your devices. What you delete from iCloud Drive is
    deleted from your other devices as well. It is, in fact, primarily a synchronization service.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 7 18:07:39 2024
    On 2024-03-07 17:39, dgb (David) wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 22:27:39 GMT, "Alan Browne" <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-07 04:33, dgb (David) wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 01:03:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>

    I don't store my entire photo library in iCloud. Doing so would cause me >>>> to pay a monthly or yearly subscription, and I'm not interested in doing >>>> that when I have lots of storage right on my Mac.

    I do store all of my photo library on iCloud and I'm happy to pay a small >>> monthly fee.

    Yeesh! I do hope you have separate copies on physical media that you
    can access.

    In the days of photographs taken with a camera I have physically printed copies. I also have dozens of CD's containing what I considered 'important' photographs.
    With the advent of the iPhone and Apple's iCloud I make do with nothing more than Time Machine backups. Try as I might, I cannot envisage Apple failing to keep my images safe in their iCloud.
    If that makes you cringe, please tell me why!

    You can never rely on a third party to do what is best for you.

    iCloud is _not_ a backup service.

    Various famous cases of photo sites losing troves of photos due to
    various reasons. Not even time for people to get their photos off.

    I would rate Apple as very unlikely to lose your data, but the chances
    that they do is a non-zero probability no matter how small.

    And probably more likely is that you may end up in a situation where you
    don't have access to iCloud when when you need it.

    Time Machine is not the most reliable backup you can have - it's mighty convenient after a whoopsie, but it's not infallible (or at least the
    external media isn't).

    You need to have static offline backups as well. And that is more work
    and maintenance. If your photos are precious - treat them as precious.

    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dgb (David@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Mar 7 23:21:18 2024
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 23:04:03 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 21:32:54 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>> On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 16:42:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    I believe iCloud can and does store material without necessarily
    sending it to other Apple devices.

    That's not its primary purpose though. As exampled, photos,
    contacts, reminders, calendars, iCloud Drive documents, app
    settings, and so on are all synchronized between all of your
    devices. Add one and it appears on all of your devices. Remove one
    from one device, and it gets removed from iCloud and your other
    devices.

    I totally accept that!

    However, I can store any other item I wish.

    Yes, but the default behavior is if you delete it, it gets deleted
    from your other devices.

    Perhaps you are not aware of changes made to iCloud.

    If you put Documents into iCloud, they are not added to iPhone and/or
    iPad.

    See:- https://i.ibb.co/ZfPsSjg/Screenshot-2024-03-07-at-22-19-10.png

    No, that's incorrect. iCloud Drive is not a generic cloud file storage service. Things you add to iCloud Drive are made available to all of the Apple devices that are logged in with the same Apple ID.

    "Made available to" ......... I accept that. But not installed upon.

    Apple's webpage about it:

    <https://support.apple.com/en-us/109344>

    Go ahead and try it for yourself. 😉

    I have! :-)

    I can ALSO access my Apple iCloud from my Windows laptop!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Mar 7 17:20:53 2024
    On 2024-03-07 14:23, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 18:01, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 21:40:42 +0000, dgb (David) said:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 16:23:38 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com>
    wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 04:45:43 GMT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com>
    wrote:

    The current reports say Apple are not planning on making a new 27in >>>>>>> iMac or iMac Pro any time soon. There are dubious rumours that
    pop up
    from time to time, including going to 32in iMac.

    That is my understanding too.

    You could of course buy a Mac Mini or Mac Studio and add whatever >>>>>>> screen size you want. Not an "all-in-one", but depending on the
    screen's base or using a display stand, it can almost be.

    My Professor friend has done exactly that!  The Studio Display is >>>>>> just
    wonderful - but expensive!

    Best display I've ever owned. I have it sitting next to a 5K LG
    UltraFine display, and it's striking how much better the Studio
    Display
    is in just about every way: color accuracy, viewing angle, backlight >>>>> consistency, overall build quality, audio quality, and camera quality. >>>>> It's worth every penny I paid for it.

    Thank you. That's really good to know. :-)

    With iCloud storage being relatively cheap, there's no (apparent)
    need
    to have lots of on-board storage nowadays.

    Personally, I can't really function without at least 2 TB of internal >>>>> storage, but I know I'm not representative of the average user.

    Is it possible for you to explain, in simple terms, why you need so
    much
    internal storage rather than using the iCloud to be a storage place
    of choice.
    (I'm assuming you have a really good Internet connection.)

    Personally I would never use cloud storage.

    Additional external USB drives are fine for most people, but if
    you're doing high-end graphics or video work, then external
    Thunderbolt or more internal storage would be better since it's a bit
    faster.

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps
    since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard
    system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    Shouldn't matter, but I doubt a licensed install of, eg,  Photoshop
    would work very well.


    Bzzzzzzt.

    Wrong!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to dgb on Fri Mar 8 01:38:22 2024
    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 23:04:03 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 21:32:54 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 16:42:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    I believe iCloud can and does store material without necessarily >>>>>>> sending it to other Apple devices.

    That's not its primary purpose though. As exampled, photos,
    contacts, reminders, calendars, iCloud Drive documents, app
    settings, and so on are all synchronized between all of your
    devices. Add one and it appears on all of your devices. Remove
    one from one device, and it gets removed from iCloud and your
    other devices.

    I totally accept that!

    However, I can store any other item I wish.

    Yes, but the default behavior is if you delete it, it gets deleted
    from your other devices.

    Perhaps you are not aware of changes made to iCloud.

    If you put Documents into iCloud, they are not added to iPhone
    and/or iPad.

    See:-
    https://i.ibb.co/ZfPsSjg/Screenshot-2024-03-07-at-22-19-10.png

    No, that's incorrect. iCloud Drive is not a generic cloud file
    storage service. Things you add to iCloud Drive are made available to
    all of the Apple devices that are logged in with the same Apple ID.

    "Made available to" ......... I accept that. But not installed upon.

    I'm not sure what you are here arguing about. When I take a photo on one device, it is transferred to my other devices. When I add a contact on
    one device, it is transferred to my other devices. When I add or change
    a calendar event, the same thing happens on my other devices. iCloud is primarily a synchronization service, but it does other things as well.
    You seem to want to argue that because iCloud Drive doesn't always automatically download changes to each device that somehow means it's
    just like any other cloud storage service, but that's simply not the
    case. Most data in iCloud is synchronized to all of your devices, and if
    you delete something from iCloud Drive it gets deleted everywhere else.
    It is *not* a generic cloud storage service.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIEcuIElzYWFr?=@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Mar 7 18:35:05 2024
    On 2024-03-06 18:29, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 17:25, André G. Isaak wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 18:17, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 17:04, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps >>>>>> since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard
    system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    I'd be willing to bet Adobe's Creative Cloud apps don't like being
    anywhere but their designated place in /Applications.


    How much?

    To be fair, I just moved Adobe Illustrator 2023 (and it's entire
    folder to be sure) from Applications to my Desktop folder...

    ...and it seems to work fine.

    But will creative cloud continue to notify you when updates are
    available? It looks at /Applications to see which software you have
    installed.

    Are you sure about that?


    Same goes for anything obtained from the App Store -- remove them from
    /Applications and the App Store will no longer notify you that updates
    are available since it won't seem them as being installed.

    Really? Show it.


    I'm certain in case of App Store apps unless things have changed since
    Monterey (this is the main reason why I stopped storing applications on external drives). I'm not certain with respect to Adobe CC, but I
    strongly suspect it. It's not important enough for me to do an experiment.

    Either of these claims could be easily tested if you chose. Pick some application installed via the app store. Restore an earlier version via
    time machine. Copy it from your /Applications folder to another drive
    and then delete it from /Applications. Check to see if the app store
    will recognize that it needs to be updated. Ditto for Adobe CC.

    Applications which check for updates when launched will generally still
    update even if located in a nonstandard location. Applications that rely
    on a separate application (like App Store.app or Creative Cloud.app) not
    so much. They tend to determine the current version based on what's in
    the /Applications folder.

    And I've run into other applications which experience strange behaviour
    when installed outside of /Applications though unfortunately I can't
    think of an example since I long ago stopped doing so.

    André

    --
    To email remove 'invalid' & replace 'gm' with well known Google mail
    service.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alrescha@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Fri Mar 8 07:23:43 2024
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    But you can't upload 500 GB of photos to iCloud and not have them on any
    of your devices because iCloud isn't an alternate generic cloud storage solution you can use in that manner.

    Of course you can. You dump those files into iCloud and let iOS/macOS
    evict them from local storage over time (or you can do this yourself).
    They don’t have to take up space anywhere else.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dgb (David@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Fri Mar 8 08:36:46 2024
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 23:07:39 GMT, "Alan Browne" <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-07 17:39, dgb (David) wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 22:27:39 GMT, "Alan Browne" <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-07 04:33, dgb (David) wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 01:03:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>

    I don't store my entire photo library in iCloud. Doing so would cause me >>>>> to pay a monthly or yearly subscription, and I'm not interested in doing >>>>> that when I have lots of storage right on my Mac.

    I do store all of my photo library on iCloud and I'm happy to pay a small >>>> monthly fee.

    Yeesh! I do hope you have separate copies on physical media that you
    can access.

    In the days of photographs taken with a camera I have physically printed
    copies. I also have dozens of CD's containing what I considered 'important' >> photographs.
    With the advent of the iPhone and Apple's iCloud I make do with nothing more >> than Time Machine backups. Try as I might, I cannot envisage Apple failing to
    keep my images safe in their iCloud.
    If that makes you cringe, please tell me why!

    You can never rely on a third party to do what is best for you.

    Indeed! I understand where you are coming from!

    iCloud is _not_ a backup service.

    I understand that. Thanks.

    Various famous cases of photo sites losing troves of photos due to
    various reasons. Not even time for people to get their photos off.

    I was taught a saluatory lesson many years ago when I had a hard drive failure .... and no back-up!

    I would rate Apple as very unlikely to lose your data, but the chances
    that they do is a non-zero probability no matter how small.

    OK - I'll accept that!

    And probably more likely is that you may end up in a situation where you don't have access to iCloud when when you need it.

    I'd be lost without my Internet connection! ;-)

    Time Machine is not the most reliable backup you can have - it's mighty convenient after a whoopsie, but it's not infallible (or at least the external media isn't).

    Indeed. I have had my WD My Book back-up drive fail on me!

    You need to have static offline backups as well. And that is more work
    and maintenance. If your photos are precious - treat them as precious.

    Yes indeed. Thanks for your thoughts on this.

    --
    David

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dgb (David@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Fri Mar 8 08:44:34 2024
    On 8 Mar 2024 at 01:38:22 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 23:04:03 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>
    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 21:32:54 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>>>> On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 7 Mar 2024 at 16:42:05 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-07, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

    I believe iCloud can and does store material without necessarily >>>>>>>> sending it to other Apple devices.

    That's not its primary purpose though. As exampled, photos,
    contacts, reminders, calendars, iCloud Drive documents, app
    settings, and so on are all synchronized between all of your
    devices. Add one and it appears on all of your devices. Remove
    one from one device, and it gets removed from iCloud and your
    other devices.

    I totally accept that!

    However, I can store any other item I wish.

    Yes, but the default behavior is if you delete it, it gets deleted
    from your other devices.

    Perhaps you are not aware of changes made to iCloud.

    If you put Documents into iCloud, they are not added to iPhone
    and/or iPad.

    See:-
    https://i.ibb.co/ZfPsSjg/Screenshot-2024-03-07-at-22-19-10.png

    No, that's incorrect. iCloud Drive is not a generic cloud file
    storage service. Things you add to iCloud Drive are made available to
    all of the Apple devices that are logged in with the same Apple ID.

    "Made available to" ......... I accept that. But not installed upon.

    I'm not sure what you are here arguing about. When I take a photo on one device, it is transferred to my other devices. When I add a contact on
    one device, it is transferred to my other devices. When I add or change
    a calendar event, the same thing happens on my other devices. iCloud is primarily a synchronization service, but it does other things as well.

    We are in agreement!

    You seem to want to argue that because iCloud Drive doesn't always automatically download changes to each device that somehow means it's
    just like any other cloud storage service, but that's simply not the
    case. Most data in iCloud is synchronized to all of your devices, and if
    you delete something from iCloud Drive it gets deleted everywhere else.

    I don't want to argue at all!

    It is *not* a generic cloud storage service.

    There is VERY little difference - but the iCloud is smarter than most! ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Mar 8 16:41:26 2024
    On 2024-03-07 20:20, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-07 14:25, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 20:17, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 17:04, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps >>>>>> since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard
    system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    I'd be willing to bet Adobe's Creative Cloud apps don't like being
    anywhere but their designated place in /Applications.


    How much?

    To be fair, I just moved Adobe Illustrator 2023 (and it's entire
    folder to be sure) from Applications to my Desktop folder...

    ...and it seems to work fine.

    :-)

    And where does the license credential reside?

    I don't know... ...but moving the application made no difference to how
    it ran.


    Can you now connect that external drive to a different Mac and run it
    with the license credentials in effect?

    Almost certainly not.

    Are you as ignorant about how macOS has worked for the last 20+ years as
    you are about proportion?

    So you don't know where the license credential resides, but my question
    is ignorant?

    Man, you're a dick. I guess that's a good thing for you.

    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Fri Mar 8 16:27:20 2024
    On 2024-03-08 13:41, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2024-03-07 20:20, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-07 14:25, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 20:17, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 17:04, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of apps >>>>>>> since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard >>>>>>> system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    I'd be willing to bet Adobe's Creative Cloud apps don't like being
    anywhere but their designated place in /Applications.


    How much?

    To be fair, I just moved Adobe Illustrator 2023 (and it's entire
    folder to be sure) from Applications to my Desktop folder...

    ...and it seems to work fine.

    :-)

    And where does the license credential reside?

    I don't know... ...but moving the application made no difference to
    how it ran.


    Can you now connect that external drive to a different Mac and run it
    with the license credentials in effect?

    Almost certainly not.

    Are you as ignorant about how macOS has worked for the last 20+ years
    as you are about proportion?

    So you don't know where the license credential resides, but my question
    is ignorant?

    I didn't say I don't know. I most certainly do.

    What's clear is that YOU have no clue about it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Mar 9 09:44:38 2024
    On 2024-03-08 19:27, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-08 13:41, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2024-03-07 20:20, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-07 14:25, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 20:17, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 17:04, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-03-06, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-03-06 14:59, Your Name wrote:

    More internal drive space can also be needed if you run lots of >>>>>>>> apps
    since some do not like to be stored / run outside of the standard >>>>>>>> system Applications folder.

    Huh?

    Give an example of one such application.

    I'd be willing to bet Adobe's Creative Cloud apps don't like being >>>>>> anywhere but their designated place in /Applications.


    How much?

    To be fair, I just moved Adobe Illustrator 2023 (and it's entire
    folder to be sure) from Applications to my Desktop folder...

    ...and it seems to work fine.

    :-)

    And where does the license credential reside?


    [AAA] You said:

    I don't know... ...but moving the application made no difference to
    how it ran.


    Can you now connect that external drive to a different Mac and run
    it with the license credentials in effect?

    Almost certainly not.

    Are you as ignorant about how macOS has worked for the last 20+ years
    as you are about proportion?

    So you don't know where the license credential resides, but my
    question is ignorant?

    I didn't say I don't know. I most certainly do.

    Please get your story straight - AAA above.

    What's clear is that YOU have no clue about it.

    Not a thing I delve into. I'm very (painfully) familiar with the user
    Library as programming requires me to learn how it is set up for some
    apps (and that various apps use and abuse it in various ways... or worse
    - change their structures and/or locations and/or formats in updates
    with no warning).

    How, eg, Adobe, store license data isn't of interest to me. I buy the
    product, install it, register it and move on. Oops - I don't anymore -
    they went full rental and I don't rent s/w ...

    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dgb (David@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sun Mar 10 18:00:24 2024
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 16:23:38 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 04:45:43 GMT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    The current reports say Apple are not planning on making a new 27in
    iMac or iMac Pro any time soon. There are dubious rumours that pop up
    from time to time, including going to 32in iMac.

    That is my understanding too.

    You could of course buy a Mac Mini or Mac Studio and add whatever
    screen size you want. Not an "all-in-one", but depending on the
    screen's base or using a display stand, it can almost be.

    My Professor friend has done exactly that! The Studio Display is just
    wonderful - but expensive!

    Best display I've ever owned. I have it sitting next to a 5K LG
    UltraFine display, and it's striking how much better the Studio Display
    is in just about every way: color accuracy, viewing angle, backlight consistency, overall build quality, audio quality, and camera quality.
    It's worth every penny I paid for it.

    With iCloud storage being relatively cheap, there's no (apparent) need
    to have lots of on-board storage nowadays.

    Personally, I can't really function without at least 2 TB of internal storage, but I know I'm not representative of the average user.

    I'd like to know why you are convesing politely here yet have 'thrown your
    toys out of the pram' elsewhere.
    Will you tell?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dgb (David@21:1/5 to david@nomale.afraid.org on Sun Mar 10 18:17:41 2024
    On 10 Mar 2024 at 18:00:24 GMT, "dgb" <David) <david@nomale.afraid.org> wrote:

    On 6 Mar 2024 at 16:23:38 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 04:45:43 GMT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: >>>
    The current reports say Apple are not planning on making a new 27in
    iMac or iMac Pro any time soon. There are dubious rumours that pop up
    from time to time, including going to 32in iMac.

    That is my understanding too.

    You could of course buy a Mac Mini or Mac Studio and add whatever
    screen size you want. Not an "all-in-one", but depending on the
    screen's base or using a display stand, it can almost be.

    My Professor friend has done exactly that! The Studio Display is just
    wonderful - but expensive!

    Best display I've ever owned. I have it sitting next to a 5K LG
    UltraFine display, and it's striking how much better the Studio Display
    is in just about every way: color accuracy, viewing angle, backlight
    consistency, overall build quality, audio quality, and camera quality.
    It's worth every penny I paid for it.

    With iCloud storage being relatively cheap, there's no (apparent) need
    to have lots of on-board storage nowadays.

    Personally, I can't really function without at least 2 TB of internal
    storage, but I know I'm not representative of the average user.

    I'd like to know why you are conversing politely here yet have 'thrown your toys out of the pram' elsewhere.
    Will you tell?

    David tosses in the missing 'r'.
    Sorry about that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to dgb on Sun Mar 10 22:23:18 2024
    On 2024-03-10, dgb <david@nomale.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 16:23:38 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    On 2024-03-06, dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 04:45:43 GMT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: >>>
    The current reports say Apple are not planning on making a new 27in
    iMac or iMac Pro any time soon. There are dubious rumours that pop up
    from time to time, including going to 32in iMac.

    That is my understanding too.

    You could of course buy a Mac Mini or Mac Studio and add whatever
    screen size you want. Not an "all-in-one", but depending on the
    screen's base or using a display stand, it can almost be.

    My Professor friend has done exactly that! The Studio Display is just
    wonderful - but expensive!

    Best display I've ever owned. I have it sitting next to a 5K LG
    UltraFine display, and it's striking how much better the Studio Display
    is in just about every way: color accuracy, viewing angle, backlight
    consistency, overall build quality, audio quality, and camera quality.
    It's worth every penny I paid for it.

    With iCloud storage being relatively cheap, there's no (apparent) need
    to have lots of on-board storage nowadays.

    Personally, I can't really function without at least 2 TB of internal
    storage, but I know I'm not representative of the average user.

    I'd like to know why you are convesing politely here yet have 'thrown your toys out of the pram' elsewhere.
    Will you tell?

    Fuck off, troll.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)