XPost: sci.logic
On 7/3/24 10:19 AM, olcott wrote:
On 7/3/2024 9:11 AM, joes wrote:
Am Tue, 02 Jul 2024 22:55:12 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/2/2024 10:50 PM, joes wrote:
Am Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:46:38 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 7/2/2024 2:17 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 02.jul.2024 om 21:00 schreef olcott:
On 7/2/2024 1:42 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 02.jul.2024 om 14:22 schreef olcott:
On 7/2/2024 3:22 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 02.jul.2024 om 03:25 schreef olcott:
HHH repeats the process twice and aborts too soon.
DDD is correctly emulated by any HHH that can exist which calls this >>>>> emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat the process until aborted (which may be
never).
Whatever HHH does, it does not run forever but aborts.
HHH halts on input DDD.
DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly halt.
WTF? It only calls HHH, which you just said halts.
An aborted simulation does not count as halting.
And doesn't show non-halting either.
Reaching it own machine address 00002183 counts as halting.
DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly do that.
But HHH doesn't DO a "Correct Simulation" that can show that, it only
does a PARTIAL simulation.
The COMPLETE simulation of THAT input (still calling HHH) shows that DDD
does halt.
And thus, you are proven to be a liar and an idiot at the same time as
this HAS been explained to you many times, but you seem unable and
unwilling to learn.
_DDD()
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002183] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)