On 8/1/24 8:28 AM, olcott wrote:
On 8/1/2024 3:33 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-08-01 04:03:36 +0000, wij said:
int main()
{
HHH(DDD);
}
That is not very useful. Running this program may demostrate that
HHH answers but does not reveal the answer. The program should be:
[Hypothetical possibilities --- Complete Proof]
On 8/1/2024 7:20 AM, olcott
The above has complete proof for every expert of
the x86 language.
No, it just proves you are a pathetic ignorant pathological lying idiot,
since your "proof" is based on the LIE that you can correct emulate code
that you don't look at, and that the correct emulation of a call
instruction does NOT entail continuing the emulation at the target
address of the call.
Thus, you just prove that you are NOT an "expert" of the x86 language,
but just a total MORON.
Sorry, you just are proving you don't care what the truth actually is,
but you will just repeat your baldface lies over and over because you
are so stupid you think someone else might beleive them.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)