• Re: Libelous statement by Alan

    From Richard Damon@21:1/5 to olcott on Thu Oct 10 21:39:01 2024
    On 10/10/24 2:22 PM, olcott wrote:
    On 10/10/2024 12:05 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
    Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
    On 2024-10-09 19:34:34 +0000, Alan Mackenzie said:

    Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote:
    On 10/8/24 8:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote:
    ... after a short break.

         Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with >>>>>> someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar".  So which are you? >>>>>> Not sane?  Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone who is >>>>>> incapable of conceding them?  Or lying when you describe Peter?  You >>>>>> must surely have better things to do.  Meanwhile, you surely noticed >>>>>> that Peter is running rings around you.

    In other words, you don't understand the concept of defense of the
    truth.

    Maybe, but continuously calling your debating opponent a liar, and
    doing
    so in oversized upper case, goes beyond truth and comes perilously
    close
    to stalking.

    Calling a liar a liar is fully justified. I don't know how often it
    needs be done but readers of a liar may want to know that they are
    reading a liar.

    We know Peter Olcott has lied in things that matter.  However, I believe
    his continual falsehoods are more a matter of delusion than mendacity.
    As Mike Terry has said, OP's intellectual capacity is low.  Calling him
    a liar in virtually every post is, I think, unwarranted.


    The fact that no one can even point out a single mistake
    conclusively proves that any lying is not on my side of
    the dialogue.

    Which could be taken as a libelous statement towards everyone that HAS
    pointed out errors that you haven't even tried to refute.

    Since your logic is based on lies, your attempt a defense based on
    truthful statements will just fail. Remember, for that defense, you have
    the burden of proof, and your "fast talk" will certainly fall flat.



    void DDD()
    {
      HHH(DDD);
      return;
    }

    HHH is an x86 emulation based termination analyzer.
    Each DDD emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.

    Each of the directly executed HHH emulator/analyzers that returns
    0 correctly reports the above non-terminating behavior of its input.

    Fully operational code is here. https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)