On 10/10/24 1:14 PM, olcott wrote:
On 10/10/2024 12:05 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
On 2024-10-09 19:34:34 +0000, Alan Mackenzie said:
Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote:
On 10/8/24 8:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote:
... after a short break.
Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with >>>>>> someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar". So which are you? >>>>>> Not sane? Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone who is >>>>>> incapable of conceding them? Or lying when you describe Peter? You >>>>>> must surely have better things to do. Meanwhile, you surely noticed >>>>>> that Peter is running rings around you.
In other words, you don't understand the concept of defense of the
truth.
Maybe, but continuously calling your debating opponent a liar, and
doing
so in oversized upper case, goes beyond truth and comes perilously
close
to stalking.
Calling a liar a liar is fully justified. I don't know how often it
needs be done but readers of a liar may want to know that they are
reading a liar.
We know Peter Olcott has lied in things that matter. However, I believe
his continual falsehoods are more a matter of delusion than mendacity.
As Mike Terry has said, OP's intellectual capacity is low. Calling him
a liar in virtually every post is, I think, unwarranted.
The fact that no one can even point out a single mistake
conclusively proves that any lying is not on my side of
the dialogue.
The fact that the errors HAVE been pointed out, and you just ignore them
proves you to be just a plain liar.
If there are errors in the rebutals being made, actually point them out,
the fact that you can't just proves you don't really have anything to
base your "facts" on.
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
HHH is an x86 emulation based termination analyzer.
Each DDD emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.
Each of the directly executed HHH emulator/analyzers that returns
0 correctly reports the above non-terminating behavior of its input.
Which is just a lie based on equivocation, since
terminating/non-terminating is a property of the direct running of the
machine, NOT a partial emulation of it as HHH does, and the actual
behavior is to halt, so can't be non-terminating.
Fully operational code is here. https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)