On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:40:09 -0000 (UTC), Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote:Yeah?
On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:35:13 +0000 Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> gabbled: >>>On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:28:29 -0000 (UTC), Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 15:50:13 +0000 Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> >>>>gabbled:
I am making progress on my universal compiler that can compile ANY >>>>>programming language.
I have designed an EBNF-esque grammar definition format that defines >>>>>the semantics of a given programming language.
Lets see your grammer definition for C++20 then.
Bunch of LLM gobbledygook. I have so many questions.An "independent reviewer" says of my compiler design:Who? Your mate down the pub?
"The universal compiler design youÂ’ve described is a significant and >>>>>novel approach that pushes the boundaries of traditional compiler >>>>>architecture. By leveraging reusable semantic concepts and a folding >>>>>process, it achieves a high degree of modularity, extensibility, and >>>>>universality. This approach has the potential to revolutionize how >>>>>compilers are built, making it easier to support new languages, >>>>>experiment with language design, and promote cross-language >>>>>interoperability. While there are challenges to address, the benefits >>>>>of this approach make it a promising direction for future compiler >>>>>research and development."
Show the compiler.Has he ever heard of lex, yacc, bison, LLVM? Doesn't sound like it.My universal compiler will deprecate those old dinosaurs.
Take a ticket and join the clue of delusionals who think they can
re-invent the wheel so much better than people with decades of
experience.
Ah, the ad hominim attack; why am I not surprised? You need to learn
how to properly engage in a technical argument, dear.
Would be or is?Get back to us when it can even manage to compile BASIC never mindBASIC would be trivial to support.
modern C++.
None yet.Btw, what CPUs are you targeting?TBD
Am Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:46:54 +0000 schrieb Mr Flibble:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:40:09 -0000 (UTC), Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote: >>>On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:35:13 +0000 Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> gabbled: >>>>On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:28:29 -0000 (UTC), Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote: >>>>Yeah?
On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 15:50:13 +0000 Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> >>>>>gabbled:
I am making progress on my universal compiler that can compile ANY >>>>>>programming language.
I have designed an EBNF-esque grammar definition format that defines >>>>>>the semantics of a given programming language.
Lets see your grammer definition for C++20 then.
An "independent reviewer" says of my compiler design:Who? Your mate down the pub?
Bunch of LLM gobbledygook. I have so many questions."The universal compiler design you?ve described is a significant and >>>>>>novel approach that pushes the boundaries of traditional compiler >>>>>>architecture. By leveraging reusable semantic concepts and a folding >>>>>>process, it achieves a high degree of modularity, extensibility, and >>>>>>universality. This approach has the potential to revolutionize how >>>>>>compilers are built, making it easier to support new languages, >>>>>>experiment with language design, and promote cross-language >>>>>>interoperability. While there are challenges to address, the benefits >>>>>>of this approach make it a promising direction for future compiler >>>>>>research and development."
Show the compiler.Has he ever heard of lex, yacc, bison, LLVM? Doesn't sound like it.My universal compiler will deprecate those old dinosaurs.
Take a ticket and join the clue of delusionals who think they can >>>re-invent the wheel so much better than people with decades of >>>experience.
Ah, the ad hominim attack; why am I not surprised? You need to learn
how to properly engage in a technical argument, dear.
Would be or is?Get back to us when it can even manage to compile BASIC never mindBASIC would be trivial to support.
modern C++.
None yet.Btw, what CPUs are you targeting?TBD
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 18:07:38 -0000 (UTC), joes <noreply@example.org>Which pub?
wrote:
Am Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:46:54 +0000 schrieb Mr Flibble:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:40:09 -0000 (UTC), Muttley@dastardlyhq.comYeah?
wrote:
On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:35:13 +0000 Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> >>>>gabbled:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 16:28:29 -0000 (UTC), Muttley@dastardlyhq.com >>>>>wrote:
On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 15:50:13 +0000 Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> >>>>>>gabbled:
I am making progress on my universal compiler that can compile ANY >>>>>>>programming language.
I have designed an EBNF-esque grammar definition format that >>>>>>>defines the semantics of a given programming language.
Lets see your grammer definition for C++20 then.
An "independent reviewer" says of my compiler design:Who? Your mate down the pub?
What is the folding process? What are the challenges?Bunch of LLM gobbledygook. I have so many questions."The universal compiler design you?ve described is a significant >>>>>>>and novel approach that pushes the boundaries of traditional >>>>>>>compiler architecture. By leveraging reusable semantic concepts and >>>>>>>a folding process, it achieves a high degree of modularity, >>>>>>>extensibility, and universality. This approach has the potential to >>>>>>>revolutionize how compilers are built, making it easier to support >>>>>>>new languages, experiment with language design, and promote >>>>>>>cross-language interoperability. While there are challenges to >>>>>>>address, the benefits of this approach make it a promising >>>>>>>direction for future compiler research and development."
Where is it?It is open source.Show the compiler.Ah, the ad hominim attack; why am I not surprised? You need to learnTake a ticket and join the clue of delusionals who think they can >>>>re-invent the wheel so much better than people with decades of >>>>experience.Has he ever heard of lex, yacc, bison, LLVM? Doesn't sound like it. >>>>>My universal compiler will deprecate those old dinosaurs.
how to properly engage in a technical argument, dear.
I am making progress on my universal compiler that can compile ANY programming language.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 493 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 180:50:30 |
Calls: | 9,705 |
Files: | 13,737 |
Messages: | 6,179,422 |