On 5/7/25 6:01 PM, olcott wrote:
What exact sequence of the following machine addresses
of DD emulated by HHH causes DD to reach its own
final halt state at machine address [00002155]
Program is UNDEFINED, as the contents of 000015C3 hasn't been provided.
You obviously have removed your stupulation of HHH at that location, as
that HHH doesn't do what it needs to do to follow that question
In other words, you question is asking for a round square.
When this sequence is required to conform to the
rules of the x86 language?
_DD()
[00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
[00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d pop ebp
[00002155] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
IF you want to know what the actual correct emulation of that code is,
the just add the function:
int main() {
DD();
}
and run your x86utm on the code.
Note, you are just proving that you are a damned pathological liar that
uses equivocation by asking this question, and you are trying to imply
that HHH is both your decider that aborts, and thus isn;t a c0rrect
emulator, and also is a correct emulator.
Sorry, that just shows that your logic is based on square circles,
pathological lies, and equivocation.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)