1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.THEORY

  • Re: Analysis of =?UTF-8?Q?Flibble=E2=80=99s?= Latest: Detecting vs. Sim

    From Alan Mackenzie@21:1/5 to olcott on Sat May 24 17:07:11 2025
    olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 5/23/2025 5:06 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
    On 23/05/2025 22:06, olcott wrote:
    On 5/23/2025 3:50 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
    On 23/05/2025 21:24, olcott wrote:

    <snip>

    Liar

    An unequivocal response, but it lacks persuasive power.


    When I provide the exact detailed steps of exactly how
    people can show that I am wrong and they refuse to
    show that I am wrong yet claim that I am wrong this
    is the kind of reckless disregard for the truth that
    loses defamation cases.

    When your opponents point to the Turing proof that proves you're wrong

    Without going through all of the detailed steps
    that I present that is a reckless disregard for
    the truth that loses defamation cases.

    There you are utterly wrong. The Halting Theorem has been proven, thus
    is true. Anybody putting up a contrary argument must therefore be wrong.

    You might also put up a long winded argument why 2 + 2 = 5, and I would
    dismiss this likewise, without bothering to follow your exact detailed
    steps.

    You've also tried, without success, to dismiss one of the proofs of the
    Halting Therem as invalid.

    Thus, as a general rule, it is sensible to dismiss as not worthy of
    attention anything you assert about mathematical logic.

    If somebody competent were to put up such a contrary argument, it might
    well be worth looking at. But that's different - and it hasn't happened.

    --
    Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
    hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

    --
    Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Mackenzie@21:1/5 to olcott on Sun May 25 12:02:05 2025
    olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 5/24/2025 12:07 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
    olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 5/23/2025 5:06 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
    On 23/05/2025 22:06, olcott wrote:
    On 5/23/2025 3:50 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
    On 23/05/2025 21:24, olcott wrote:

    <snip>

    Liar

    An unequivocal response, but it lacks persuasive power.


    When I provide the exact detailed steps of exactly how
    people can show that I am wrong and they refuse to
    show that I am wrong yet claim that I am wrong this
    is the kind of reckless disregard for the truth that
    loses defamation cases.

    When your opponents point to the Turing proof that proves you're wrong

    Without going through all of the detailed steps
    that I present that is a reckless disregard for
    the truth that loses defamation cases.

    There you are utterly wrong. The Halting Theorem has been proven, thus
    is true. Anybody putting up a contrary argument must therefore be wrong.

    You might also put up a long winded argument why 2 + 2 = 5, and I would
    dismiss this likewise, without bothering to follow your exact detailed
    steps.

    You've also tried, without success, to dismiss one of the proofs of the
    Halting Therem as invalid.


    And would be successful if people actually paid
    attention to what I said. That they say that I
    am wrong without actually addressing ANY of my
    points is actionable.

    No, that proof you so much dislike is clearly and quite obviously valid
    to anybody with any background in mathematics at all.

    People have paid a very great deal of attention to what you've said, in
    an effort to help you understand what you haven't understood. You've
    failed to respond to the help offered. Instead, you've deluged this
    newsgroup with falsehoods.

    That you fail to grasp this proof is entirely down to your lack of
    intellectual capacity.

    If that's "actionable", then I look forward to seeing you in court in Nuremberg. Perhaps first you should learn a little German.

    [ .... ]

    Thus, as a general rule, it is sensible to dismiss as not worthy of
    attention anything you assert about mathematical logic.

    If somebody competent were to put up such a contrary argument, it might
    well be worth looking at. But that's different - and it hasn't happened.

    --
    Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
    hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

    --
    Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)