On 6/6/25 12:03 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/6/2025 7:59 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:
"all you work is just a bit fat LIE" -- Richard Damon.
Richard Damon is a child.
/Flibble
Yes he is.
If he had correct reasoning he would not need mere rhetoric.
But it isn't just "rhetoric", as every accusation of lying, is preceeded
by pointing out the factual basis for the claim.
You have so much as admitted that you whole work is just a lie, as you
admit the your Decider and Input are not "orogrms" per the term-of-art,
and yet, you also say they correspond to the proof, where the first
requirement on them is that the ARE programs.
Thus, your whole work *IS* based on a lie, the lie that you system is in conformance to the proof you are claiming to refute.
Of course, your really problem is that you don't really know the meaning
of the words as terms-of-art, and don't care to learn, and you think you
have the "right" to change the meaning, which is just one form of
INTENTIONAL deception (to use a word knowing you aren't using it in the
meaning implied by the field) and in fact state that at any point you
"reserve" the right to use whate-ever "common" meaning of a word you
want, which is just an admissition that anything you say could be a lie.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)