On 8/25/2025 5:30 AM, Richard Harnden wrote:
On 24/08/2025 23:19, olcott wrote:
On 8/24/2025 4:56 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/6/2004 9:11 AM, Peter Olcott wrote:
One very simple transformation of the problem into a
solvable problem
is to convert the Boolean function DoesItHalt() into a
tertiary response:
True, False, Neither.
if (DoesItHalt() == True)
while(True) // loop forever
;
else if (DoesItHalt() == False)
return False;
else if (DoesItHalt() == NeitherTrueNorFalse)
return NeitherTrueNorFalse;
So the original Halting Problem was incorrectly formed
specifically
because it was framed as a Boolean function, thus failing to
account
for possible inputs that result in a reply other than True
or False.
https://www.usenetarchives.com/view.php?
id=sci.logic&mid=PGJDRndjLjEzOTgwJEd4NC4yNTM3QGJndG5zYzA0LW5ld3Mub3BzLndvcmxkbmV0LmF0dC5uZXQ%2B
You link to a thread on sci.logic in which everybody disagrees
with you.
Which is more likely?
(A) you're a genius and nobody can see it?
or (B) you're wrong?
Prior to Pythagoras there was a universal
consensus that the Earth was flat.
This was my very first post on the HP back in 2004.
Because I have worked on this for 21 years I have
noticed key details that no one else has ever bothered
to notice.
Five different LLM systems are in consensus in their
reverse engineering of my reasoning from this basis:
<Input to LLM systems>
Simulating Termination Analyzer HHH correctly simulates its input
until:
(a) Detects a non-terminating behavior pattern:
abort simulation and return 0.
They agree on this key fact DD correctly simulated by
HHH cannot possibly reach its own "return" statement
final halt state in any finite number of steps.
Most everyone on this forum have been gaslighting me
on this key point for three years.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 36:07:48 |
Calls: | 10,392 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 14,064 |
Messages: | 6,417,152 |