• Re: How you can help with upstream issues - metadata

    From Hefee@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 12 23:18:53 2024
    Hi,

    I want to remind people that on each Debian source package we have upstream metadata in debian/upstream/metadata that points to the correct project & component on https://bugs.kde.org (DEP-12). That information helped me already a lot to not do the search for the correct component upstream. Maybe someone knows a Debian tool to get this information via command line, that could improve the search for duplicates.

    Regards,

    hefee

    --

    On Donnerstag, 12. Dezember 2024 13:46:20 CET Martin Steigerwald wrote:
    Hi Aurélien, hi.

    Aurélien COUDERC - 12.12.24, 13:19:34 MEZ:
    So I strongly advise to only report bugs upstream directly :
    - If the version of the Debian package matches the latest upstream
    release. That's currently the case for Plasma and kf6 in
    trixie/unstable but would never be the case for stable.

    Thanks! You are right. This is an important aspect. Upstream is overworked
    as well. And there are way to help them. Actually as far as I saw so far, almost every free software project is overworked on bug triaging.

    I focused this mostly on Plasma 6 and so on from unstable and forgot a bit about the old stuff, so it is good you bring that in! But even with KDE software from unstable: some is not yet up to date. For for example for latest KDEPIM is in experimental, but not in unstable currently. As for packages in experimental, it may be good to ask / report here first, before reporting a Debian bug.

    It is not useful for upstream to report any issues on Plasma 5 or for that matter for any KDE Gear stuff which still relies on KDE Frameworks 5 unless they also happen in latest or almost latest upstream version.

    Diverging a bit from your recommendation I'd say if you run Plasma, let's
    say 6.2.4 and upstream just released Plasma 6.2.5 a few days ago, an
    upstream report may still be helpful, in case you have checked whether it
    is reported already. Probably after also looking in upstream announcement whether the issue has been fixed meanwhile. I think it would be
    unreasonable to expect users to always be on the newest upstream release
    on the day of release. Upstream themselves word it as:

    "...using relatively recent versions of KDE software (≤ 1 year old) or an LTS supported version"

    Here you can find more information on upstream bug reporting:

    https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/Issue_Reporting

    As well as triaging:

    https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging

    This is really a great way to help out both in Debian and in upstream. And you do not need to be a developer for that. Also you can help out in
    little pieces as your schedule allows for it.

    - Once you've double checked that no existing bug report in bugs.kde.org already describes the issue you're having.

    I mentioned that. But yes… please avoid duplicates in the upstream bug tracker.

    Best,


    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOewRoCAWtykmSRoG462wCFBgVjYFAmdbYU0ACgkQ462wCFBg VjawOg//RPvK7Sg6PnO+zfx0l266/qyWOTOKIBvh2ipQKqLev9FDibRFOCDy0o0b tNiNtCSuxfVmTJIZtMEPj43U4M6CNjaYv/psyGJyS36ZVCyrQzHmg2ev/b2UiGfQ E6ScioX7ks/4/ghF37bEHAitldnI30pX3m/roImBBpUoQKjFbBxzq+69yLA1eDji 7sFWV3DTDG7PPu8WMTSm1yR/Tv4LHWltcboFcxwLwLdUPCe16/MygSXDlQQG7S1z zWIsEHXv7pQNqNOyp27tqIRzDm8UhfDEPAZPiPDAhYUziqa63Ur8FekAO5QosXBm EGi9HFomXwcEkzaRz/p+6VpRNDx4wWhXPA2IhAzN2BMqp6natvkcNMKz64MdVKqh BBvDC2xT9xWHBqUp1JOGeeBgR22GLGnr3QF3kBflgt+Z3vBmXtseqB2Uc/BEsI/0 aRCgZN2Xi199110+RyTLiOFDBafzDb+NWyvDzhujNCpFqAwCKP0s1OPR7Jm3y5Yf VhLF1NgaimLmHOjwVW9OFiHBIwKLj0YUNGKp+6ooKRERMXuAEkp9TU0Kh1TXXf4y L8Ir7vBz6B4p1qfRV+vrvbXud/nmmWJfqcyO2HmBkEFT8ADZ7IEn4y9AH0kYdZlL R1wJFLs+HO58AvYsXnNzymnP6ObtbyeaOCSrVy26QcEt3yo4w50=
    =w2+I
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)