This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Two things I would like to see for the stable release are: 1) Debian develop its own desktop designed for stable, and 2) remove buggy
packages from the stable repo. An examination of the stable repos over
the past 15 years reveals that Debian has allowed a lot more
non-functional software in the stable repo these days than it did 15
years ago, and to the detriment of its users.. I expect software in the stable repo to be fully functional, and if not has a maint ainer who is
willing to fix it. If this doesn't apply then that software should stay
in the testing, or unstable versions.
And with respect to developing Debian's own desktop, XFCE's latest
contribution are disappointing to say the least, and there are
shortcomings with a number of the other desktops. Stability is
increased if Debian has its own desktop.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><font size="4"> Two things I would like to see for the stable
release are: 1) Debian develop its own desktop designed for
stable, and 2) remove buggy packages from the stable repo. An
examination of the stable repos over the past 15 years reveals
that Debian has allowed a lot more non-functional software in
the stable repo these days than it did 15 years ago, and to the
detriment of its users.. I expect software in the stable repo
to be fully functional, and if not has a maint ainer who is
willing to fix it. If this doesn't apply then that software
should stay in the testing, or unstable versions.</font></p>
<p><font size="4">And with respect to developing Debian's own
desktop, XFCE's latest contribution are disappointing to say the
least, and there are shortcomings with a number of the other
desktops. Stability is increased if Debian has its own desktop.</font></p>
<p><font size="4"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="4"><br>
</font></p>
</body>
</html>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)