1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.RC

  • Bug#1086464: mate-desktop FTBFS on 32-bit with 64-bit time_t with gcc 1

    From James Addison@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 16 15:00:01 2025
    Source: mate-desktop
    Followup-For: Bug #1086464
    Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-desktop/issues/631

    Associating this RC bug with an existing upstream bugreport for the same.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 16 15:00:01 2025
    Processing control commands:

    forwarded -1 https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-desktop/issues/631
    Bug #1086464 [src:mate-desktop] mate-desktop FTBFS on 32-bit with 64-bit time_t with gcc 14
    Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-desktop/issues/631'.

    --
    1086464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1086464
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 17 17:40:01 2025
    Processing control commands:

    tags -1 patch
    Bug #1086464 [src:mate-desktop] mate-desktop FTBFS on 32-bit with 64-bit time_t with gcc 14
    Added tag(s) patch.

    --
    1086464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1086464
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 17 18:20:01 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:08:35 +0000
    with message-id <E1tuDx5-00GuC5-9t@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1086464: fixed in mate-desktop 1.26.2-1.2
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1086464,
    regarding mate-desktop FTBFS on 32-bit with 64-bit time_t with gcc 14
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1086464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1086464
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2024 21:37:55 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
    DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,
    SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,
    USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST,XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham
    autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 19; hammy, 150; neutral, 19; spammy,
    0. spammytokens:
    hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
    0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
    0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
    Return-path: <bunk@debian.org>
    Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:de