1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.RC

  • Bug#1088400: libept: FTBFS

    From asciiwolf@seznam.cz@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 29 14:20:02 2025
    I'm not sure if you realize this, but Synaptic depends on libept. I really hope that the "synaptic" package is not removed from Debian (and/or Ubuntu). That would be a *huge* problem for the (hundreds of) thousands of users who use Synaptic. I've already
    contacted the Synaptic developer about this and I hope it can be resolved soon.

    Thanks,
    Daniel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Julian Andres Klode@21:1/5 to asciiwolf@seznam.cz on Wed Jan 29 19:40:01 2025
    On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:04:42PM +0100, asciiwolf@seznam.cz wrote:
    I'm not sure if you realize this, but Synaptic depends on libept. I really hope that the "synaptic" package is not removed from Debian (and/or Ubuntu). That would be a *huge* problem for the (hundreds of) thousands of users who use Synaptic. I've
    already contacted the Synaptic developer about this and I hope it can be resolved soon.

    I have filed bugs for all reverse dependencies, and just uploaded
    a synaptic NMU to DELAYED/15 (Closes: #1093202)
    --
    debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
    ubuntu core developer i speak de, en

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 17 19:30:01 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2025 18:21:00 +0000
    with message-id <E1tuF5A-00H7FC-TG@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1100178: Removed package(s) from unstable
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1088400,
    regarding libept: do not ship in trixie [ftbfs + RoM]
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1088400: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088400
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Nov 2024 19:02:16 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-119.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,HAS_PACKAGE,
    SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,
    USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 150; neutral, 607; spammy,
    0. spammytokens:
    hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
    0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
    0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
    Return-path: <sanvila@debian.org>
    Re