On 23.12.24 Hilmar Preusse (hille42@web.de) wrote:

On 23.12.24 Lucas Nussbaum (lucas@debian.org) wrote:

Hi Lucas,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to
build on armhf.

This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so this is a regression. Also, there are no known issues on amd64 or arm64
according to recent (a couple days ago) rebuilds.

This seems to be caused by #1085120, although the bug is for armel.
The phenomena are about the same. I mark this bug as blocked by the
other and wait for gs 10.00.05 .

Currently gs 10.00.05 does not exists and even if it will be released
tomorrow, I have doubt that it will make it into trixie.

Would it be allowed to simply drop the architechtures in question for
trixie and re-include it later?

Hilmar

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iL0EABECAH0WIQTGd6SdBhZfNVqXZSgB6PhGb/EsMAUCZ6FCbF8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0QzY3 N0E0OUQwNjE2NUYzNTVBOTc2NTI4MDFFOEY4NDY2RkYxMkMzMAAKCRAB6PhGb/Es MHSoAJ9w5GxDdk4j16FgtB0qOMVOSL/2xwCgpMUw+rm4REp46FAb4q7iuQwNvsU=
=z2JS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)