1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.RC

  • Bug#1094377: xraylib: FTBFS with numpy 2.x

    From Bas Couwenberg@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 27 16:40:01 2025
    Source: xraylib
    Version: 4.0.0+dfsg1-6
    Severity: serious
    Tags: upstream ftbfs
    Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
    Control: block 1082237 by -1

    Dear Maintainer,

    Your package FTBFS during the numpy2 transition:

    https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=xraylib&arch=amd64&ver=4.0.0%2Bdfsg1-6%2Bb1&stamp=1737969403&raw=0

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 27 16:40:02 2025
    Processing control commands:

    block 1082237 by -1
    Bug #1082237 [release.debian.org] transition: numpy 2
    1082237 was blocked by: 1094332 1094369 1094370 1094371 1094372 1094373 1094374 1094375 1094376
    1082237 was not blocking any bugs.
    Added blocking bug(s) of 1082237: 1094377

    --
    1082237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082237
    1094377: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094377
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 10 06:40:01 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Mon, 10 Feb 2025 05:26:12 +0000
    with message-id <E1thMJA-00EkTk-Gi@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1094377: fixed in xraylib 4.0.0+dfsg1-7
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1094377,
    regarding xraylib: FTBFS with numpy 2.x
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1094377: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094377
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2025 15:36:14 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,
    SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,XMAILER_REPORTBUG
    autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 19; hammy, 113; neutral, 23; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--sk:buildd.,
    0.000-+--UD:buildd.debian.org, 0.000-+--buildddebianorg,
    0.000-+--buildd.debian.org, 0.000-+--UD:fetch.php
    Return-path: <sebastic@xs4all.nl>
    Received: from 77-172-224-45.fixed.kpn.net ([77.172.224.45]:50742 helo=linuxminded.nl)
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2)
    (envelope-from <sebastic@xs4all.nl>)
    id