• Bug#1095362: marked as done (opm-common: FTBFS: 99% tests passed, 1 tes

    From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 9 19:50:02 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Sun, 09 Feb 2025 18:39:49 +0000
    with message-id <E1thCDd-00CHsh-82@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1095362: fixed in opm-common 2024.10+ds-3
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1095362,
    regarding opm-common: FTBFS: 99% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 194
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1095362: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095362
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2025 12:12:12 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-120.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,FROMDEVELOPER,FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD,
    HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,
    USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC
    autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 130; hammy, 150; neutral, 275; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--python3, 0.000-+--pkgbuilddir,
    0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 0.000-+--trixie, 0.000-+--sk:dh_auto
    Return-path: <sanvila@debian.org>
    Received: from mitropoulos.debian.org ([2001
  • From Markus Blatt@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 9 20:10:02 2025
    Hi,

    thanks for noticing.

    The failing test is due tp Python 3.12 using a more accurate summation algorithm (Neumaier) for summation of floats than previous versions.
    I'll fix this by using numpy.sum for the failing test.

    Best,

    Markus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)