Hello Xiyue,

Thanks.

What if we add a Breaks to Emacs in trixie saying it's incompatible with dh-elpa-helper <<2.1.7 ?

The following situation is what could break an upgrade:
- emacs upgraded to version from trixie
- dh-elpa-helper still on the version from bookworm
- an addon gets upgraded, and tries to bytecompile.

But a Breaks would mean dpkg would ensure the first two conditions are
never true.

Then we do indeed do a backport of dh-elpa to bookworm-backports so that
Emacs in backports remains installable.

No stable update needed.

--
Sean Whitton

--=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmfH93wZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQFRtD/9HkTAkFLgaBQ5UhtW5WQaz VQ7WNw7p92rEvlyB82moFj3+HdS3vB9BZXnV2RbRFyu/HzRojtYHBWUPe3jWCtqg g8lqe/bsc6EBfB5L8OBi81y+kXG3ZtOO7uFIo6j9Xyn27AqIdqMLfB0lToukBinp IiPL5PW+PW0WbMDV9VDHCrvFGfvG7Q9nhP2YrUjEQT5jOeM/3JuNtZPmm4/PHrYd 44UVTBBUe+NnkcPTB2lZXstlaQJpYC5XMjqkqjzBc1vzx6ut6zKiw+Qe5uM5jYxD 1ZTs+r+t2wBuF3P86EwjvecDA1vCWFpDjakIRLNNFA59omV/U07w85BtHbcMwiIj FEfq5TiaqocNkTBg53JpjXCYA+T6ps3x6U5UAdFU/Lnp/Uz3dHmrxFYYeH1GSggF ZGZ6i1Lp/26Zc9iGAvNqgA9ddW+h31+zrGJP3vwVxKtlh1mZS7HIsxRsm0W0oXBk E32q4BpP18yo80ob04NevdyTgyCkiRywP5vlfI7qRhlX4IUvujh11ExrxDuK7OjX yr2uVbqu2pO9yf5MQx3PmWmGcXgldst7ItF8yPlIAmyac62b37Vd6x+TwGgzOMAF jqgRRSYYC4MuYgtSqMjG+6rRaPDnLmvUxul9VZKVxrZAyB08Czjbb9M6B9XqT4id FB5+yb2tiE6870TmUlDZMw==poNv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Us