1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.RC

  • Bug#1099839: librpm-sequoia-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr

    From Helmut Grohne@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 8 19:40:02 2025
    Package: librpm-sequoia-dev
    Version: 1.7.0-3
    Severity: serious
    User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
    Usertags: fileconflict
    Control: affects -1 + librpm-sequoia-1

    librpm-sequoia-dev has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in
    an unpack error from dpkg.

    The file /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/rpm-sequoia.pc is contained
    in the packages
    * librpm-sequoia-1/1.7.0-2 as present in trixie
    * librpm-sequoia-dev/1.7.0-3 as present in unstable

    These packages can be unpacked concurrently, because there is no
    relevant Replaces or Conflicts relation. Attempting to unpack these
    packages concurrently results in an unpack error from dpkg, because none
    of the packages installs a diversion for the affected file.

    Kind regards

    The Debian Usr Merge Analysis Tool

    This bug report has been automatically filed with no human intervention.
    The source code is available at https://salsa.debian.org/helmutg/dumat.
    If the filing is unclear or in error, don't hesitate to contact helmut@subdivi.de for assistance.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 27 19:30:01 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:20:03 +0000
    with message-id <E1txrpj-00E7kA-Hc@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1099839: fixed in rust-rpm-sequoia 1.7.0-4
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1099839,
    regarding librpm-sequoia-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/rpm-sequoia.pc
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1099839: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1099839
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2025 18:31:31 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-25.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_CONTROL_AFFECTS,BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIM_SIGNED,
    DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_NONE,
    SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 9; hammy, 139; neutral, 37; spammy, 0.
    spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--trixie, 0.000-+--H*F:U*helmut,
    0.000-+--H*F:D*subdivi.de, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:helmut@,
    0.000-+--H*rp:U*helmut
    Return-path: <helmut@subdivi.de>
    Received: from isilmar-4.linta.de ([136.243.71.142]:58564)
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA25