1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.RC

  • Bug#1100217: flake8-class-newline: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No modul

    From Santiago Vila@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 12 17:40:01 2025
    Package: src:flake8-class-newline
    Version: 1.6.0-5
    Severity: serious
    Tags: ftbfs trixie sid

    Dear maintainer:

    During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [...]
    debian/rules clean
    dh clean --buildsystem=pybuild
    dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=pybuild
    I: pybuild base:311: python3.13 setup.py clean
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/setup.py", line 3, in <module>
    from setuptools import setup
    ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools'
    E: pybuild pybuild:389: clean: plugin distutils failed with: exit code=1: python3.13 setup.py clean
    dh_auto_clean: error: pybuild --clean -i python{version} -p 3.13 returned exit code 13
    make: *** [debian/rules:4: clean] Error 25
    dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules clean subprocess returned exit status 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The above is just how the build ends and not necessarily the most relevant part.
    If required, the full build log is available here:

    https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202503/

    About the archive rebuild: The build was made on virtual machines from AWS, using sbuild and a reduced chroot with only build-essential packages.

    If you could not reproduce the bug please contact me privately, as I
    am willing to provide ssh access to a virtual machine where the bug is
    fully reproducible.

    If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use
    reassign and add an affects on src:flake8-class-newline, so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this package.

    Thanks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 12 19:30:01 2025
    Processing control commands:

    tag -1 pending
    Bug #1100217 [src:flake8-class-newline] flake8-class-newline: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools'
    Added tag(s) pending.

    --
    1100217: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100217
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Colin Watson@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 12 19:30:01 2025
    Control: tag -1 pending

    Hello,

    Bug #1100217 in flake8-class-newline reported by you has been fixed in the
    Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
    message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

    https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flake8-class-newline/-/commit/82974f7780da093010bd33fb09fbe85143e73e2e

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Build-depend on python3-setuptools

    Closes: #1100217 ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (this message was generated automatically)
    --
    Greetings

    https://bugs.debian.org/1100217

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 12 19:40:02 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Wed, 12 Mar 2025 18:34:53 +0000
    with message-id <E1tsQur-00Ax4f-SQ@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1100217: fixed in flake8-class-newline 1.6.0-6
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1100217,
    regarding flake8-class-newline: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools'
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1100217: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100217
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2025 16:30:59 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-121.2 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,
    SPF_NONE,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC
    autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 8; hammy, 150; neutral, 79; spammy, 0.
    spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--trixie, 0.000-+--pkgbuilddir,
    0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 0.000-+--H*F:U*sanvila, 0.000-+--H*rp:U*sanvila Return-path: <sanvila@debian.org>
    Received: from mailly.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb:6564:a62:52c3:4b