1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.RC

  • Bug#1101970: workrave: missing Replaces for workrave-data

    From Helmut Grohne@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 3 10:10:01 2025
    Package: workrave
    Version: 1.10.51.1-4
    Severity: serious
    Tags: patch
    User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
    Usertags: fileconflict
    Control: affects -1 + workrave-data

    Hi,

    two files were moved from workrave-data to workrave in version
    1.10.51.1-4 (according to its d/changelog):
    * /usr/share/gir-1.0/Workrave-1.0.gir
    * /usr/share/metainfo/workrave.appdata.xml

    workrave declares appropriate Breaks but misses the required Replaces to prevent concurrent unpacks from failing. As a result, bookworm -> trixie upgrades may fail. Please add:

    Replaces: workrave-data (<< 1.10.51.1-4)

    to the workrave binary package section in debian/control.

    Helmut

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 3 10:10:01 2025
    Processing control commands:

    affects -1 + workrave-data
    Bug #1101970 [workrave] workrave: missing Replaces for workrave-data
    Added indication that 1101970 affects workrave-data

    --
    1101970: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101970
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 4 07:10:01 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Fri, 04 Apr 2025 05:05:15 +0000
    with message-id <E1u0ZEx-001Ebi-H8@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1101970: fixed in workrave 1.10.53-2
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1101970,
    regarding workrave: missing Replaces for workrave-data
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1101970: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101970
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2025 08:03:28 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-25.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_CONTROL_AFFECTS,BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIM_SIGNED,
    DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_NONE,
    SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 14; hammy, 106; neutral, 32; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--trixie, 0.000-+--bookworm,
    0.000-+--H*F:U*helmut, 0.000-+--H*F:D*subdivi.de,
    0.000-+--H*RU:sk:helmut@
    Return-path: <helmut@subdivi.de>
    Received: from isilmar-4.linta.de ([136.243.71.142]:60542)
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__A