1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.RC

  • Bug#1095376: more info

    From Russell Coker@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 12 10:10:01 2025
    Here are the results of running valgrind with a debugging build of every relevant package installed:

    ==241689== Invalid read of size 8
    ==241689== at 0x53A92E: UnknownInlinedFun (objimpl.h:6)
    ==241689== by 0x53A92E: _PyObject_New (object.c:534)
    ==241689== by 0x70D3532: SWIG_Python_newvarlink (selinuxswig_python_wrap.c: 1575)
    ==241689== by 0x70D3628: SWIG_globals (selinuxswig_python_wrap.c:1605) ==241689== by 0x70D5922: SWIG_Python_DestroyModule (selinuxswig_python_wrap.c:2973)
    ==241689== by 0x669F13: capsule_dealloc.lto_priv.0 (capsule.c:290) ==241689== by 0x542199: UnknownInlinedFun (object.c:2939)
    ==241689== by 0x542199: UnknownInlinedFun (object.h:949)
    ==241689== by 0x542199: UnknownInlinedFun (object.h:1042)
    ==241689== by 0x542199: UnknownInlinedFun (dictobject.c:496)
    ==241689== by 0x542199: UnknownInlinedFun (dictobject.c:481)
    ==241689== by 0x542199: dict_dealloc.lto_priv.0 (dictobject.c:3179) ==241689== by 0x68DD81: module_dealloc.lto_priv.0 (moduleobject.c:777) ==241689== by 0x53312C: UnknownInlinedFun (object.c:2939)
    ==241689== by 0x53312C: UnknownInlinedFun (object.h:949)
    ==241689== by 0x53312C: UnknownInlinedFun (object.h:1042)
    ==241689== by 0x53312C: insertdict.lto_priv.0 (dictobject.c:1843)
    ==241689== by 0x68C9A9: UnknownInlinedFun (pylifecycle.c:1598)
    ==241689== by 0x68C9A9: finalize_modules.lto_priv.0 (pylifecycle.c:1745) ==241689== by 0x66B924: _Py_Finalize.constprop.0 (pylifecycle.c:2132) ==241689== by 0x69E3FE: Py_Exit (pylifecycle.c:3520)
    ==241689== by 0x68BE1A: handle_system_exit (pythonrun.c:679)
    ==241689== Address 0x20 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd ==241689==
    ==241689==
    ==241689== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV) ==241689== Access not within mapped region at address 0x20
    ==241689== at 0x53A92E: UnknownInlinedFun (objimpl.h:6)
    ==241689== by 0x53A92E: _PyObject_New (object.c:534)
    ==241689== by 0x70D3532: SWIG_Python_newvarlink (selinuxswig_python_wrap.c: 1575)
    ==241689== by 0x70D3628: SWIG_globals (selinuxswig_python_wrap.c:1605) ==241689== by 0x70D5922: SWIG_Python_DestroyModule (selinuxswig_python_wrap.c:2973)
    ==241689== by 0x669F13: capsule_dealloc.lto_priv.0 (capsule.c:290) ==241689== by 0x542199: UnknownInlinedFun (object.c:2939)
    ==241689== by 0x542199: UnknownInlinedFun (object.h:949)
    ==241689== by 0x542199: UnknownInlinedFun (object.h:1042)
    ==241689== by 0x542199: UnknownInlinedFun (dictobject.c:496)
    ==241689== by 0x542199: UnknownInlinedFun (dictobject.c:481)
    ==241689== by 0x542199: dict_dealloc.lto_priv.0 (dictobject.c:3179) ==241689== by 0x68DD81: module_dealloc.lto_priv.0 (moduleobject.c:777) ==241689== by 0x53312C: UnknownInlinedFun (object.c:2939)
    ==241689== by 0x53312C: UnknownInlinedFun (object.h:949)
    ==241689== by 0x53312C: UnknownInlinedFun (object.h:1042)
    ==241689== by 0x53312C: insertdict.lto_priv.0 (dictobject.c:1843)
    ==241689== by 0x68C9A9: UnknownInlinedFun (pylifecycle.c:1598)
    ==241689== by 0x68C9A9: finalize_modules.lto_priv.0 (pylifecycle.c:1745) ==241689== by 0x66B924: _Py_Finalize.constprop.0 (pylifecycle.c:2132) ==241689== by 0x69E3FE: Py_Exit (pylifecycle.c:3520)
    ==241689== by 0x68BE1A: handle_system_exit (pythonrun.c:679)
    ==241689== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
    ==241689== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
    ==241689== possible), you can try to increase the size of the


    --
    My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
    My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)