• Bug#1104730: closed by Scott Talbert (Re: Bug#1104730:

    From Adrian Bunk@21:1/5 to Debian Bug Tracking System on Mon May 5 19:00:01 2025
    Control: reopen -1

    On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 04:36:04PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

    Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 12:23:35 -0400 (EDT)
    From: Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net>
    To: Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>, 1104730-done@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#1104730: wxwidgets3.2: FTBFS on arm*

    This seems have been some sort of transient error with the arm buildds, all rebuilt successfully on retry. Closing.

    It's not transient, the build succeeded only on the fastest arm buildds.

    Also looking at #1050238, is some timeout too small?

    cu
    Adrian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Talbert@21:1/5 to Adrian Bunk on Mon May 5 19:30:01 2025
    On Mon, 5 May 2025, Adrian Bunk wrote:

    Control: reopen -1

    On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 04:36:04PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

    Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 12:23:35 -0400 (EDT)
    From: Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net>
    To: Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>, 1104730-done@bugs.debian.org
    Subject: Re: Bug#1104730: wxwidgets3.2: FTBFS on arm*

    This seems have been some sort of transient error with the arm buildds, all >> rebuilt successfully on retry. Closing.

    It's not transient, the build succeeded only on the fastest arm buildds.

    Also looking at #1050238, is some timeout too small?

    How does the speed of amdahl compare to the rest of the arm buildds? If
    it's also "fastest" then it will likely be hard to test any sort of fix
    attempt for this. Other than disabling these tests.

    Looks like wxwidgets3.2 built fine on a variety of arm buildds previously.
    I suspect this change in behavior is probably related to webkit2gtk
    changes...

    Scott

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adrian Bunk@21:1/5 to Scott Talbert on Tue May 6 09:40:02 2025
    On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 01:13:28PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
    On Mon, 5 May 2025, Adrian Bunk wrote:

    Control: reopen -1

    On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 04:36:04PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:

    Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 12:23:35 -0400 (EDT)
    From: Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net>
    To: Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>, 1104730-done@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#1104730: wxwidgets3.2: FTBFS on arm*

    This seems have been some sort of transient error with the arm buildds, all
    rebuilt successfully on retry. Closing.

    It's not transient, the build succeeded only on the fastest arm buildds.

    Also looking at #1050238, is some timeout too small?

    How does the speed of amdahl compare to the rest of the arm buildds? If
    it's also "fastest" then it will likely be hard to test any sort of fix attempt for this. Other than disabling these tests.

    Looks like wxwidgets3.2 built fine on a variety of arm buildds previously. I suspect this change in behavior is probably related to webkit2gtk changes...


    The i386-only test failure is likely due to excess precision of the FPU,
    but most/all of the rest might just be a timeout too short.


    riscv64 has the same hardware on buildds and porterbox, and it is slower
    than all arm hardware we have.


    Result on the buildd:

    All tests passed (17060 assertions in 360 test cases)



    Removing both test exclusions from debian/rules:

    test cases: 361 | 360 passed | 1 failed
    assertions: 17156 | 17127 passed | 29 failed


    Removing both test exclusions from debian/rules plus
    - bool WaitEvent(int timeInMs = 1000);
    + bool WaitEvent(int timeInMs = 10000);

    All tests passed (17179 assertions in 361 test cases)



    Scott

    cu
    Adrian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)