• Bug#1104755: rspamd: FTBFS on s390x: expected " 192.168.0.1 ", for host

    From Chris Hofstaedtler@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 5 21:10:01 2025
    Source: rspamd
    Version: 3.11.1-2
    Severity: serious
    Tags: ftbfs

    hi,

    rspamd previously built on s390x, but 3.11.1-2 fails. Please check
    the log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rspamd&arch=s390x&ver=3.11.1-2&stamp=1745516644&raw=0

    The last few lines are:

    Parse url: http:\\%30%78%63%30%2e%30%32%35%30.01:
    Assert failed: expected expected " 192.168.0.1 ", for host, but got " 1.0.168.192 " in url http:\\%30%78%63%30%2e%30%32%35%30.01 => {[url] = http://1.0.168.192, [protocol] = http, [tld] = 1.0.168.192, [host] = 1.0.168.192}
    stack traceback:
    ...oducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/telescope.lua:199: in function 'assert_equal'
    ...roducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/unit/url.lua:175: in function <...roducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/unit/url.lua:167>
    [C]: in function 'xpcall'
    ...oducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/telescope.lua:441: in function 'invoke_test'
    ...oducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/telescope.lua:481: in function 'run'
    ...reproducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/tests.lua:28: in main chunk
    Parse url: http://0.0xFFFFFF:
    Assert failed: expected expected " 0.255.255.255 ", for host, but got " 0.255.255.0 " in url http://0.0xFFFFFF => {[url] = http://0.255.255.0, [protocol] = http, [tld] = 0.255.255.0, [host] = 0.255.255.0}
    stack traceback:
    ...oducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/telescope.lua:199: in function 'assert_equal'
    ...roducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/unit/url.lua:175: in function <...roducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/unit/url.lua:167>
    [C]: in function 'xpcall'
    ...oducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/telescope.lua:441: in function 'invoke_test'
    ...oducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/telescope.lua:481: in function 'run'
    ...reproducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/tests.lua:28: in main chunk
    Parse url: http:\/0xc0.052000001:
    Assert failed: expected expected " 192.168.0.1 ", for host, but got " 0.168.0.192 " in url http:\/0xc0.052000001 => {[url] = http://0.168.0.192, [protocol] = http, [tld] = 0.168.0.192, [host] = 0.168.0.192}
    stack traceback:
    ...oducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/telescope.lua:199: in function 'assert_equal'
    ...roducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/unit/url.lua:175: in function <...roducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/unit/url.lua:167>
    [C]: in function 'xpcall'
    ...oducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/telescope.lua:441: in function 'invoke_test'
    ...oducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/telescope.lua:481: in function 'run'
    ...reproducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1/build/test/lua/tests.lua:28: in main chunk
    ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
    make[1]: *** [debian/rules:60: override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
    make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/reproducible-path/rspamd-3.11.1'
    make: *** [debian/rules:26: binary-arch] Error 2
    dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary-arch subprocess returned exit status 2
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Best,
    Chris

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 13 18:40:01 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 16:35:01 +0000
    with message-id <E1uEsar-00AxDp-PN@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1104755: fixed in rspamd 3.11.1-3
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1104755,
    regarding rspamd: FTBFS on s390x: expected " 192.168.0.1 ", for host, but got " 1.0.168.192 " ...
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1104755: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104755
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2025 18:57:28 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
    DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,
    NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,
    UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST
    autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 44; hammy, 150; neutral, 31; spammy,
    0. spammytokens:
    hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
    0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
    0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
    Return-path: <zeha@debian.org>
    Received: from stravinsky.debian.org