• Bug#1104824: litl: Recommends litl-doc but the package is no longer bui

    From =?UTF-8?Q?Jeremy_B=C3=ADcha?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 7 02:50:01 2025
    Source: litl
    Version: 0.2-1
    Severity: serious

    Several packages built by litl still have Recommends: litl-doc but
    that package is no longer built.

    I believe it is a violation of Debian Policy § 2.2.1 [1] for a package
    in Debian main to recommend a package that does not exist in Debian
    main. Therefore I am filing as RC.

    Because litl is not a key package [2] and because it has autopkgtests
    which are not marked as superficial, I believe a fix for this issue
    would be allowed to migrate to Testing with no further action after 20
    days [3].

    [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#the-main-archive-area
    [2] https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
    [3] https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html#hard

    Thank you,
    Jeremy Bícha

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 7 07:40:01 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Wed, 07 May 2025 05:35:54 +0000
    with message-id <E1uCXRi-00BrC5-JK@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1104824: fixed in litl 0.2-2
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1104824,
    regarding litl: Recommends litl-doc but the package is no longer built
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1104824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104824
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2025 00:41:21 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
    DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
    RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,
    SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 14; hammy, 136; neutral, 31; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--debianpolicy,
    0.000-+--debian-policy, 0.000-+--H*F:D*canonical.com,
    0.000-+--H*rp:D*canonical.com, 0.000-+--autopkgtests
    Return-path: <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com>
    Received: from smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com ([185.125.188.122]:33120)
    b