On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 05:03:59PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 07:24:00AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Charles, thanks for the offer. I'm indeed on it and I'm in contact
with upstream to see if we can get vetted/blessed patches for the
older version in bookworm. We should try hard to avoid breakage.
We have now wetted/blessed upstream changes, and I'm going to pick
those. They are referenced as well in the upstream issues as repsonse
to your questions as well so we should be ready to go (unless we spot
some problems while testing).
Attached are the patches we aim to use for bookworm.
The first one, is very similar to your backported one, but it uses
abort() instead of exit(1), as upstream suggested to be consistent
with avifAlloc(). I put an explanation in the patch.
The second was handled after all in public as you asked there as well,
so it is identical to what Wan-Teh Chang posted on the issue.
Hope this helps.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 07:15:04 |
Calls: | 10,386 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 14,058 |
Messages: | 6,416,640 |