1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.RC

  • Bug#1109836: quantlib: New version breaks quantlib-swig

    From Santiago Vila@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 24 19:50:01 2025
    Package: src:quantlib
    Version: 1.39-1
    Severity: serious
    Control: affects -1 src:quantlib-swig

    Dear maintainer:

    During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, package src:quantlib-swig
    failed to build from source. There are build logs available here:

    https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/arm64/quantlib-swig.html

    I did a debbisect and this is what I found:

    bisection finished successfully
    last good timestamp: 20250723T143535Z
    first bad timestamp: 20250723T202938Z
    the following packages differ between the last good and first bad timestamp:
    libquantlib0-dev 1.38-1 -> 1.39-1
    libquantlib0v5 1.38-1 -> 1.39-1

    I'm filing this bug mainly to ensure that src:quantlib does
    not propagate to testing while src:quantlib-swig is still unfixed.

    As I see that you maintain both packages, if you prefer to consider this issue as a bug in src:quantlib-swig, please file a new bug and do not close this one until it's safe to do so (preferably after the release of trixie).

    Note: I am aware that this is a little bit artificial. The good way to prevent bad packages from propagating to testing is to use autopkgtests.

    Thanks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dirk Eddelbuettel@21:1/5 to Santiago Vila on Thu Jul 24 20:20:01 2025
    On 24 July 2025 at 19:47, Santiago Vila wrote:
    | Package: src:quantlib
    | Version: 1.39-1
    | Severity: serious
    | Control: affects -1 src:quantlib-swig

    These two go in pairs: I only uploaded quantlib 1.39 yesterday so
    quantlib-swig 1.39 to follow today.

    Dirk

    | Dear maintainer:
    |
    | During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, package src:quantlib-swig
    | failed to build from source. There are build logs available here:
    |
    | https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/arm64/quantlib-swig.html
    |
    | I did a debbisect and this is what I found:
    |
    | bisection finished successfully
    | last good timestamp: 20250723T143535Z
    | first bad timestamp: 20250723T202938Z
    | the following packages differ between the last good and first bad timestamp: | libquantlib0-dev 1.38-1 -> 1.39-1
    | libquantlib0v5 1.38-1 -> 1.39-1
    |
    | I'm filing this bug mainly to ensure that src:quantlib does
    | not propagate to testing while src:quantlib-swig is still unfixed.
    |
    | As I see that you maintain both packages, if you prefer to consider this issue
    | as a bug in src:quantlib-swig, please file a new bug and do not close this one
    | until it's safe to do so (preferably after the release of trixie).
    |
    | Note: I am aware that this is a little bit artificial. The good way to prevent
    | bad packages from propagating to testing is to use autopkgtests.
    |
    | Thanks.

    --
    dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 24 21:10:01 2025
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Thu, 24 Jul 2025 19:07:03 +0000
    with message-id <E1uf1HT-0032yx-2c@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1109836: fixed in quantlib-swig 1.39-1
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1109836,
    regarding quantlib: New version breaks quantlib-swig
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1109836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1109836
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2025 17:47:22 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-129.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_CONTROL_AFFECTS,BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
    DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,
    HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
    USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 18; hammy, 149; neutral, 43; spammy,
    0. spammytokens:
    hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
    0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
    0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
    Return-path: <sanvila@debian.org>
    Received: fro