d3vf4n@tutanota.com wrote at Sat, 29 Jul 2023:
Package: tasksel
Version: 3.73
There are tasksel tasks that
1. The command "tasksel --list-tasks" does not list.
2. They do not show either in the task description file "/usr/share/tasksel/descs/debian-tasks.desc"
Some examples are the tasks "science-tasks", "electronic-tasks", "education-tasks", and quite a few more:
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bookworm§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=all&keywords=tasksel
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bookworm§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=live-task-
Despite all this, tasksel can actually install them: for instance, "tasksel -t install science-tasks".
[ Adding debian-blends mailinglist to the loop ]
The first packages.d.o link from above lists these packages (amongst others):
pan-tasks: PAN Blends tasks for tasksel
electronics-tasks: Debian Electronics tasks for tasksel
science-tasks: Debian Science tasks for tasksel
multimedia-tasks: Debian Multimedia tasks for tasksel
junior-tasks: Debian Jr. tasks for tasksel
games-tasks: Debian Games tasks for tasksel
debichem-tasks: DebiChem tasks for tasksel
gis-tasks: Debian GIS tasks for tasksel
med-tasks: Debian Med tasks for tasksel
education-tasks: Debian Edu tasks for tasksel
fbx-tasks: FreedomBox tasks for tasksel
astro-tasks: Debian Astronomy Pure Blend (tasksel tasks)
hamradio-tasks: Debian Hamradio Tasks
blends-tasks: Debian Pure Blends tasks for new installations
These look to me as an early attempt, to allow blends installation from
our debian-installer (via tasksel). Is this correct?
Since there is a (new) working mechanism for this approach now (via
blendsel [1]), the above packages might be no longer needed?
Or are they still used?
In every case, this approach now might be irritating, since it is based
on tasksel, while the new mechanism works via the new blendsel (so
completely independent from tasksel) ...
I was not aware of these packages, when I developed blendsel, BTW.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-blends/2025/01/msg00000.html
I'd also like to stress that due to my other tasks I'm not regularly
reading this list - feel free to ping me more hardly than in simple list >replies.
Am Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:04:35PM +0100 schrieb Holger Wansing:
d3vf4n@tutanota.com wrote at Sat, 29 Jul 2023:
Package: tasksel
Version: 3.73
There are tasksel tasks that
1. The command "tasksel --list-tasks" does not list.
2. They do not show either in the task description file "/usr/share/tasksel/descs/debian-tasks.desc"
Some examples are the tasks "science-tasks", "electronic-tasks", "education-tasks", and quite a few more:
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bookworm§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=all&keywords=tasksel
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bookworm§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=live-task-
Despite all this, tasksel can actually install them: for instance, "tasksel -t install science-tasks".
[ Adding debian-blends mailinglist to the loop ]
The first packages.d.o link from above lists these packages (amongst others):
pan-tasks: PAN Blends tasks for tasksel
electronics-tasks: Debian Electronics tasks for tasksel
science-tasks: Debian Science tasks for tasksel
multimedia-tasks: Debian Multimedia tasks for tasksel
junior-tasks: Debian Jr. tasks for tasksel
games-tasks: Debian Games tasks for tasksel
debichem-tasks: DebiChem tasks for tasksel
gis-tasks: Debian GIS tasks for tasksel
med-tasks: Debian Med tasks for tasksel
education-tasks: Debian Edu tasks for tasksel
fbx-tasks: FreedomBox tasks for tasksel
astro-tasks: Debian Astronomy Pure Blend (tasksel tasks)
hamradio-tasks: Debian Hamradio Tasks
blends-tasks: Debian Pure Blends tasks for new installations
I think the last one does not really fit into that list. All others
are providing tasksel support for the according blend
These look to me as an early attempt, to allow blends installation from
our debian-installer (via tasksel). Is this correct?
I do not think that the initial idea was debian-installer support.
However, it might be perfectly usalbe for this as well.
Since there is a (new) working mechanism for this approach now (via
blendsel [1]), the above packages might be no longer needed?
Or are they still used?
I *personally* do not use these. Unfortunately we can't really know
since we have no direct from our users. Do you think these packages are >creating any harm if these are just available?
In every case, this approach now might be irritating, since it is based
on tasksel, while the new mechanism works via the new blendsel (so
completely independent from tasksel) ...
That's a valid point, thought,
I was not aware of these packages, when I developed blendsel, BTW.
Do you have any suggestion what should be changed?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 488 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 09:33:47 |
Calls: | 9,664 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 13,711 |
Messages: | 6,167,199 |
Posted today: | 2 |