• Bug#926208: could we split this package?

    From Russell Coker@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 3 09:00:01 2025
    There have been ongoing issues of IPv4 vs IPv6 for years, this bug is from
    2019 and #792894 is from 2015.

    Could we just split the package? Then if someone doesn't want IPv6 functionality they just don't install that package.

    IPv4 has limited addresses and needs different management methods to IPv6 so using the same package for both will often not be the desired option.

    --
    My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
    My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Hofstaedtler@21:1/5 to Russell Coker on Fri Apr 4 00:20:01 2025
    On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 05:49:07PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
    There have been ongoing issues of IPv4 vs IPv6 for years, this bug is from 2019 and #792894 is from 2015.

    Could we just split the package? Then if someone doesn't want IPv6 functionality they just don't install that package.

    ISC DHCP is EOL upstream. I would find packaging changes like that a
    bit surprising at this time.

    just my 2 cents,
    Chris

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Russell Coker@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 4 01:40:01 2025
    On Friday, 4 April 2025 09:15:32 AEDT Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
    ISC DHCP is EOL upstream. I would find packaging changes like that a
    bit surprising at this time.

    Fair enough. I've filed a bug report requesting that the description of the package be changed to note that it is EOL upstream. I was unaware of this
    fact and there are probably many people using it who are also unaware.

    --
    My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
    My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)