• Bug#1102129: RM: last-align [armel armhf i386] -- ROM; buggy on 32-bit

    From =?utf-8?Q?=C3=89tienne?= Mollier@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 5 15:00:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.ports.arm, linux.debian.devel.qa

    Package: ftp.debian.org
    Severity: normal
    X-Debbugs-Cc: last-align@packages.debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org, plessy@debian.org
    Control: affects -1 + src:last-align
    User: ftp.debian.org@packages.debian.org
    Usertags: remove
    User: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
    Usertags: armel armhf
    User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
    Usertags: i386

    Hi FTP Team,

    last-align has been removed from testing today. When looking up
    the reason, I noted that was because it is now built with build
    dependency architecture-is-64-bit. I had a quick investigation
    and noted that autopkgtests were probably regressing due to an
    infinite loop in the test "last-test", when checking on i386.

    It looks to me Charles' plan was to remove 32-bit support to the
    package officially, but the removal request dropped off the
    radar, so I wrapped one up now. last-align is one of Debian Med
    packages and we consider preferrable to remove 32-bit support
    when it causes problem, because interest for 32-bit platforms
    for running scientific applications has sunset some time ago.

    Have a nice day, :)
    --
    .''`. Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>
    : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
    `. `' sent from /dev/pts/1, please excuse my verbosity
    `- on air: Orpheo - Ease Is Nowhere Near

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEj5GyJ8fW8rGUjII2eTz2fo8NEdoFAmfxJ90ACgkQeTz2fo8N EdqBKA//cb8iyKbHXqT7rA1tvS4IBW9Q4BQA8I3b9p3xpj5zDteNp8M8r0my+msI 7aFWBHFHP43FYXXRjyCn2Zq9Xvy6v0naz4R1mSU4rj75xiv1IVByuQsFPVKEfmY0 QbaUrb1y/BsNMZBCpfCTyfpoXTakoRdDdWFLu+8BRpqDzd+v0nRrDFbo09xQDDvj EvO0P3A68Z+LssTEc8NFSYXDLucIXvkVGL+NmrlgEgmxvQT3M8Rxss8qQ1zWACnz hRXxOtJmVDbJ07FFBY4LYZojRlKPLyvk76GG2uDQzmlQrNDQK0acrsBUsFEZZslT KU72kG+cfLI0pKPk07VAPgI5xM8QD9TzdGomQJo9wKEEWqkrTt21Bia35z2mZk53 pFTl/2ns1UfksfhoBYxwe66DRh8+x3+bT6ZRwZiAznJKSWAnILLkt5RFTWdhyupT P8DEWaw5h/ZnD15ePtwHBCilxlVTZLFFYUBs33oU9eyBBoBgwCDOH8us7HpMIvZt VE24OOQv5aRYH/uPB7ZhpZRZthrn9Wz0MOYT+cZfWCoAI366DXORs2OzhxkqLrNr o1es13ZgLTW6RzoHsxM2fY5fNwJ7gFsAdzFTZcWaTZFWpYUosEfE+KOlLIIqYu7l pkD/eHoR2be59PWMH8vMkuI/ns9zG4w4pAVK
  • From Charles Plessy@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 5 15:50:01 2025
    Le Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 02:53:49PM +0200, Étienne Mollier a écrit :

    It looks to me Charles' plan was to remove 32-bit support

    Thanks Étienne for your action and sorry that I forgot to ask for the
    removal of the 32-bit packages!

    Have a nice week-end,

    Charles

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)