1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.DIST

  • Bug#1107081: RM: pgpool2, libpgpool2, libpgpool-dev, postgresql-17-pgpo

    From Christoph Berg@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 1 12:30:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.ports.s390

    Package: ftp.debian.org
    Severity: normal
    X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
    User: ftp.debian.org@packages.debian.org
    Usertags: remove
    User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
    Usertags: s390x

    Please remove the s390x binaries of pgpool2:

    pgpool2, libpgpool2, libpgpool-dev, postgresql-17-pgpool2

    The package is not supporting big-endian architectures anymore.

    Thanks,
    Christoph

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Christoph Berg@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 2 12:10:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.ports.s390

    Re: Pranav P

    Hi Christoph,

    I am from IBM and was just going through the github issue which was raised in regards to this.
    I would love to take a look at the issue. If I can find anything I will update.

    Thanks!

    Fwiw, there is also the question if the s390x buildd for apt.postgresql.org is coming back:

    https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z9Gn0VV4fJ8qT8tL%40msg.df7cb.de

    The machine at Marist College wasn't keeping up.

    Christoph

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Elizabeth K. Joseph@21:1/5 to myon@debian.org on Mon Jun 2 20:40:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.ports.s390

    On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 2:55 AM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
    Fwiw, there is also the question if the s390x buildd for apt.postgresql.org is coming back:

    https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z9Gn0VV4fJ8qT8tL%40msg.df7cb.de

    The machine at Marist College wasn't keeping up.

    I checked in with the team today and we're still aiming to move the
    Postgres allocation to a new part of the Marist environment to improve performance, but there keep being delays. I'm hopeful it'll be done
    this month.

    If the situation with these builders is improved, will support for the
    packages noted in this bug return, or was there another technical
    reason for removal?

    --
    Elizabeth K. Joseph || Lyz || pleia2

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Christoph Berg@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 3 11:50:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.ports.s390

    Re: Elizabeth K. Joseph
    The machine at Marist College wasn't keeping up.

    I checked in with the team today and we're still aiming to move the
    Postgres allocation to a new part of the Marist environment to improve performance, but there keep being delays. I'm hopeful it'll be done
    this month.

    Thanks for the update. It would have been nice to get some feedback on
    this before - getting support for this machine was pretty hard, I had
    to poke people for weeks before I got the first answer from
    engineering, and that was just "everything is too busy", and silence
    since then. If we want to support s390x on apt.postgresql.org again,
    support (and performance) needs to be much better.

    If the situation with these builders is improved, will support for the packages noted in this bug return, or was there another technical
    reason for removal?

    These are two independent problems. pgpool2 just doesn't work on s390x
    atm: https://github.com/pgpool/pgpool2/issues/106

    Christoph

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)