XPost: linux.debian.ports.s390

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
User: ftp.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x

Please remove the s390x binaries of pgpool2:

pgpool2, libpgpool2, libpgpool-dev, postgresql-17-pgpool2

The package is not supporting big-endian architectures anymore.

Thanks,
Christoph

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: linux.debian.ports.s390

Re: Pranav P

Hi Christoph,

I am from IBM and was just going through the github issue which was raised in regards to this.
I would love to take a look at the issue. If I can find anything I will update.

Thanks!

Fwiw, there is also the question if the s390x buildd for apt.postgresql.org is coming back:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z9Gn0VV4fJ8qT8tL%40msg.df7cb.de

The machine at Marist College wasn't keeping up.

Christoph

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: linux.debian.ports.s390

On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 2:55 AM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:

Fwiw, there is also the question if the s390x buildd for apt.postgresql.org is coming back:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Z9Gn0VV4fJ8qT8tL%40msg.df7cb.de

The machine at Marist College wasn't keeping up.

I checked in with the team today and we're still aiming to move the
Postgres allocation to a new part of the Marist environment to improve performance, but there keep being delays. I'm hopeful it'll be done
this month.

If the situation with these builders is improved, will support for the
packages noted in this bug return, or was there another technical
reason for removal?

--
Elizabeth K. Joseph || Lyz || pleia2

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: linux.debian.ports.s390

Re: Elizabeth K. Joseph

The machine at Marist College wasn't keeping up.

I checked in with the team today and we're still aiming to move the
Postgres allocation to a new part of the Marist environment to improve performance, but there keep being delays. I'm hopeful it'll be done
this month.

Thanks for the update. It would have been nice to get some feedback on
this before - getting support for this machine was pretty hard, I had
to poke people for weeks before I got the first answer from
engineering, and that was just "everything is too busy", and silence
since then. If we want to support s390x on apt.postgresql.org again,
support (and performance) needs to be much better.

If the situation with these builders is improved, will support for the packages noted in this bug return, or was there another technical
reason for removal?

These are two independent problems. pgpool2 just doesn't work on s390x
atm: https://github.com/pgpool/pgpool2/issues/106

Christoph

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)