On 03-02-2022 18:53, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Hoping to automate this process, I've setup a transition tracker for Rakudo [1].
See https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2022/02/msg00029.html and follow-up messages.
Quoting Paul Gevers (2022-02-03 19:08:34)
On 03-02-2022 18:53, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Hoping to automate this process, I've setup a transition tracker
for Rakudo
[1].
See
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2022/02/msg00029.html and follow-up messages.
As I understand it, librust-* packages are released as arch:any (not arch:all) for this exact reason (I seem to recall some discussion
with
the ftpmaster and/or release team about that - evidently leading to
that
praxis being tolerated, except I am totally wrong and the cause for
Rust
is a different one).
- Jonas
@dod: It looks that we have to change the Architecture: of raku-*
packages into any (instead of "all") because there is no binnmu
for Arch:all package. Then upon each time we bump the rakudo API
version, we just need to file a regular transition bug to the
release team and trigger the rebuild.
On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 19:13 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Paul Gevers (2022-02-03 19:08:34)
On 03-02-2022 18:53, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Hoping to automate this process, I've setup a transition tracker
for Rakudo
[1].
See
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2022/02/msg00029.html and follow-up messages.
As I understand it, librust-* packages are released as arch:any (not arch:all) for this exact reason (I seem to recall some discussion
with
the ftpmaster and/or release team about that - evidently leading to
that
praxis being tolerated, except I am totally wrong and the cause for
Rust
is a different one).
- Jonas
On 2022-02-03 17:58:24, M. Zhou wrote:
@dod: It looks that we have to change the Architecture: of raku-*
packages into any (instead of "all") because there is no binnmu
for Arch:all package. Then upon each time we bump the rakudo API
version, we just need to file a regular transition bug to the
release team and trigger the rebuild.
If the pre-compiled files are like pyc files for Python, is there are
a
reason to not follow the same approach? That is, build the pre-
compiled
files on install.
Cheers
On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 19:13 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Paul Gevers (2022-02-03 19:08:34)
On 03-02-2022 18:53, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Hoping to automate this process, I've setup a transition
tracker
for Rakudo
[1].
See
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2022/02/msg00029.html a
nd
follow-up messages.
As I understand it, librust-* packages are released as arch:any
(not
arch:all) for this exact reason (I seem to recall some discussion
with
the ftpmaster and/or release team about that - evidently leading
to
that
praxis being tolerated, except I am totally wrong and the cause
for
Rust
is a different one).
- Jonas
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 147:53:09 |
Calls: | 10,383 |
Calls today: | 8 |
Files: | 14,054 |
D/L today: |
2 files (1,861K bytes) |
Messages: | 6,417,737 |