On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 06:32:47PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
Am 06.04.24 um 18:29 schrieb Colin Watson:
There might be some small errors in this, but I couldn't see any when eyeballing the resulting uniquified list of Maintainer fields. It looks like 78% of source packages in unstable are team-maintained, which can't reasonably be called an "exception".
https://trends.debian.net/#co-maintenance is the best ressource that I know for this sort of stuff. Thanks to Lucas Nussbaum by the way for creating
this service!
Thanks. Unfortunately this undercounts team maintenance very
significantly (by at least 4000) as a result of
https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/MailingListContinuation. Given the
timing of that change compared to the sudden increase in co-maintained
packages on that graph, I suspect they're mostly being misfiled as co-maintained.
I've filed
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/497
to fix this, but even after that's accepted and uploaded, I'm not sure
how long it would take to trickle through to UDD; I presume old figures
would never be corrected.
There's still a discrepancy of several thousand compared to the numbers
I found, so I've probably missed something else similar.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [
cjwatson@debian.org]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)