1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.DEVEL

  • Re: Supporting alternative zlib implementations

    From Charles Plessy@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 25 02:40:01 2024
    Le Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:58:10PM +0200, Mark Brown a écrit :

    zlib-ng: https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng

    Hi Mark, just out of curiosity, would the carbon footprint of Debian be
    lower or higher after replacing zlib with zlib-ng?

    Have a nice day,

    Charles

    --
    Charles Plessy Nagahama, Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
    Debian Med packaging team http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tooting from home https://framapiaf.org/@charles_plessy
    - You do not have my permission to use this email to train an AI -

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Brown@21:1/5 to Charles Plessy on Wed Sep 25 10:50:01 2024
    On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 09:36:31AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
    Le Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:58:10PM +0200, Mark Brown a écrit :

    zlib-ng: https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng

    Hi Mark, just out of curiosity, would the carbon footprint of Debian be
    lower or higher after replacing zlib with zlib-ng?

    You could probably calculate it either way depending on how you want to
    make up the numbers; running faster will take less time but larger
    outputs might take more storage.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmbzytYACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DXiwf8CnHU4S4GS1iF5jxaZbhV5n2yMSj+Wd4BzqQIk3Gl5oLo9Phy086/CZo9 /AF7ASrvgMgLSaRnH7ztZHPq8u10M3sF2gVop8kgI/vRVs+qBK2VN+zu/eAbmB3z LgYeHEW1l5bKRs7Pcp59ZOehbm9faaxkOiGcPkSi82rK0Ea4tUN3BPJ6Jb+ToZf/ 1XXqVgdFbDTPTbb8JF0NIL3JHS4ot+4x+E3SpQQQMMnxshcl3lkrUGWhJnwUS9TT Lqbw8sywyo9uulB8OP+G4wgFWE+XFKyqVUVmxoV+mFrby/wzODaCL93jVjkeu8Bl JfhSPXRjYTHiBxyeDra6BVQ8QyXj2A==
    =Bq+A
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)