Only kernel 6.13 will support the new GPUs that will be released in early 2025, the new Intel CPUs, the same for a whole bunch of new hardware...
To be satisfied with kernel 6.12 would in my opinion be a big strategic mistake jeopardizing compatibility with hardware new or old Debian users.
Besides, kernel 6.12 is not yet officialized as LTS and if Debian slightly pushes back the release date of version 13 to adopt kernel 6.13, kernel.org will elect kernel 6.13 as LTS and not 6.12 !!
And backport takes several months after the release of a new edition of Debian to make new kernels available. On the other hand, the kernels offered in backport are not always very recent either, sometimes they are not even supported anymore on the security side...
Regarding the choice of Init or SytemD, I believe it is up to the end user to choose whether he wants to keep the basic philosophy of Unix by choosing to use Init or if he prefers to use SystemD which is a product developed by a company owned by Read Hat, a giant in the commercial computer industry.
Devuan offers users several init managers to choose from, this is what
Debian should have offered since Debian 8 in 2015... you should never have argued about this and made the Debian project lose developers who preferred to stay true to their ideas and who had to create Devuan for that.
As for the availability via backport of more recent kernels, this option is reserved for advanced users, so it is far from accessible to everyone !!!
Devuan offers users several init managers to choose from, this is what
Debian should have offered since Debian 8 in 2015... you should never have argued about this and made the Debian project lose developers who preferred to stay true to their ideas and who had to create Devuan for that.
Devuan offers users several init managers to choose from, this is what
Debian should have offered since Debian 8 in 2015... you should never have argued about this and made the Debian project lose developers who preferred to stay true to their ideas and who had to create Devuan for that.
Devuan offers users several init managers to choose from, this is what
Debian should have offered since Debian 8 in 2015... you should never have argued about this and made the Debian project lose developers who preferred to stay true to their ideas and who had to create Devuan for that.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 02:29:31AM +0100, phil995511 - wrote:
Devuan offers users several init managers to choose from, this is what
Debian should have offered since Debian 8 in 2015... you should never have >> argued about this and made the Debian project lose developers who preferred >> to stay true to their ideas and who had to create Devuan for that.
Devuan made it clear early on that they were unwilling to allow any runtime >dependencies on any part of systemd (except udev?). This makes it quite >incompatible with Debian's goals and I see no prospect of Debian making the >changes necessary to satisfy the Devuan developers that a separate distro is >no longer needed.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 486 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 145:54:13 |
Calls: | 9,659 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,708 |
Messages: | 6,167,917 |