On Sun, 2025-03-16 at 18:18:58 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
[…]
such as:
# On time+3, Carol wrote:
# >On time+2, Bob wrote:
# >>On time+1, Alice wrote:
# >>>Some long reply line that supposedly gets wrapper at 7x chars or
# >>>so, continued.
# >>Some long reply line that supposedly gets wrapper at 7x chars or so,
# >>continued.
# >Some long reply line that supposedly gets wrapper at 7x chars or so,
# >continued.
# Some long reply line that supposedly gets wrapper at 7x chars or so,
# continued.
Which I find to be very annoying and hard to read from my editor (vim).
And checking how this is shown now in mutt (before sending), with text_flowed disabled, but reflow_text enabled, indicates to me the
mangling is worse than I thought, but perhaps it's just reflow_text being applied to a text that is not yet sent and will not be format=flowed,
thus should not really be applied to, otherwise you might need to check
the raw text of the mail. :/
Ah, sorry, it looks like I started drafting that reply with
text_flowed enabled, and that was preserved after postponing and
continuing with a new mutt session with the option disabled. (Hopefully
the example is seen correctly now.)
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 149:24:00 |
| Calls: | 10,383 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 14,054 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (1,861K bytes) |
| Messages: | 6,417,769 |