• discussion extension (was: Re: General Resolution: Interpretation of DF

    From M. Zhou@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 6 00:30:01 2025
    Hi Andreas,

    According to constitution A.1.6, would you mind helping us extend
    the discussion period by a week?
    https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution

    From the feedbacks I've heard, there are a couple of problems we are
    facing currently.

    * Myself being confident in proposal A is one thing. But the audience
    of this GR needs more information in order to make a well-thought
    vote, while I'm suffering from low bandwidth in recent weeks.

    * People holding different opinions have really short time to prepare
    a formal polished proposal.

    Maybe those factors indicate this is not the best time to vote.
    I'm considering whether I should withdraw the proposal, collect more information to fill up the overlooked aspects, further polish the
    proposal A, and come back when it is ready. Doing so also allows
    enough time for proposal B,C,D... since people know that I'm really
    pushing this forward now.


    On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 16:09 -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
    On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 2:49 PM Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org> wrote:
    On 5/5/25 11:44, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
    It is too rush to start to vote for this within 3 weeks

    Does this maybe sound like the GR call was premature?
    The project consensus, especially after https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003, seems to say that we don't want multi-month GR discussions.


    Not quite. Proposal A is mature and I'm confident in it.
    Potential proposal B,C,D,... are premature.
    I have no intention to let people holding different opinions
    to have a very short time to prepare a formal proposal B,C,D.

    But, the whole series of discussions started 7 years ago.
    And I have already mailed everywhere about my intention
    to submit the GR. If there is no proposal B, that could mean
    it is really difficult to formally write a proposal B.

    I lean towards going ahead.

    I don't believe we have enough information to do the GR now (or one
    week from today, the longest we can delay). I am unclear on whether
    existing packages in Debian are affected. Your proposal does not
    indicate whether the GR would be effective immediately.

    My suggestion is for you to ask the DPL to extend the discussion
    period by a week (for constitutional reasons) followed by an immediate withdrawal of the GR. Withdrawing the GR allows you to resubmit later
    and wait 2-3 weeks from that point.

    Thank you,
    Jeremy Bícha

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andreas Tille@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 6 08:00:01 2025
    Hi Mo,

    Am Mon, May 05, 2025 at 06:24:32PM -0400 schrieb M. Zhou:
    Hi Andreas,

    According to constitution A.1.6, would you mind helping us extend
    the discussion period by a week?
    https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution

    I hereby extend the discussion period by a week.

    I admit that I consider this one of the most complex problems I've
    encountered during my time in Debian, and I hope the additional week
    will be sufficient. In any case, thanks to Mo for initiating the
    discussion and to everyone who contributed constructively.

    Kind regards
    Andreas.

    From the feedbacks I've heard, there are a couple of problems we are
    facing currently.

    * Myself being confident in proposal A is one thing. But the audience
    of this GR needs more information in order to make a well-thought
    vote, while I'm suffering from low bandwidth in recent weeks.

    * People holding different opinions have really short time to prepare
    a formal polished proposal.

    Maybe those factors indicate this is not the best time to vote.
    I'm considering whether I should withdraw the proposal, collect more information to fill up the overlooked aspects, further polish the
    proposal A, and come back when it is ready. Doing so also allows
    enough time for proposal B,C,D... since people know that I'm really
    pushing this forward now.

    ...
    I don't believe we have enough information to do the GR now (or one
    week from today, the longest we can delay). I am unclear on whether existing packages in Debian are affected. Your proposal does not
    indicate whether the GR would be effective immediately.

    My suggestion is for you to ask the DPL to extend the discussion
    period by a week (for constitutional reasons) followed by an immediate withdrawal of the GR. Withdrawing the GR allows you to resubmit later
    and wait 2-3 weeks from that point.

    Thank you,
    Jeremy Bícha



    --
    https://fam-tille.de

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8fAHMgoDVUHwpmPKV4oElNHGRtEFAmgZo5EACgkQV4oElNHG RtF1ew/7Bj+SNs5zUXa29BgeOcLyBu5nIcqTseNbiSzifLx4ha11RgMplCvN4PYX /26PMmdww29pDosq9pPM4rkPKl8G7ROEp4vofhd3+6NpFCqzfYo7D2mP1kv40hmK 2H1G/+AycaAwZrqkAHL9vtfTBVy+IUoz7KqhQZIHWVAz+2QVlpWQieoRg65HJzrX QMZDyZaT50IYdDSo+20qcpQY9iAO6x/17CVLa+RLCoyIVjfXcOuMqHSuaFEEf3pR jrTWY8lOBHKcWTUcZ+U7fxZO/C/j98MNRICVebk5QGyRmxMdhLjs7Mjzc35YXykY gFWLErZQlBhtuTTBbGJG7qrg0gSIuLQrkl0JvtrUMRxSf4HHzm+zzPS8ZChuhNXQ MHWlHuSYRaLXGNB0ZvUkcVypvx3OzlLRBVXlTLMtACgqt5i2L0yy/2o367BK3Xyo lPl8GL2lhxtmKmhGRvxvlBrZ/aqrnc2BxOSBtyeDFwwLQCMDzKZNcDThYRKy2ryC nsfyl3gTzX6uQ5D1FFfw05dOag1kwDo5EF2ElIBoC7/bMZ5Gmt6VIXXqclpoKVFz vUwhCr/CW6JWjqvr1G6WhW4OD5uqVKrdL89FbBRRBZEoTDGTcL9nlA+3vrXsO30P ATH2ClOR/xN/pKIvRbS9QfJYeSljHDxRRNV846KtypOjMb2WkpM=
    =WWEC
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)