How would that work for a pbuilder base image of bookworm? Would I need a
hook script to set up the unstable repo and install the package?
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023, 9:03 PM Vladimir Petko <
vladimir.petko@canonical.com> wrote:
Hi,
As far as I know, the bug was fixed in [1] which is safe to update to. Updating to 20230710 is also safe as the July security release version contains ca-certificates-java trigger in the postinstall script.
Best Regards,
Vladimir.
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1436785/accepted-ca-certificates-java-20230620-source-into-unstable/
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 3:30 PM Dan Mick <dmick@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi guys; sorry for the out-of-band email.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030129
is affecting a number of projects on bookworm, ceph among them; I see
that it's been tagged 'bookworm-ignore' and I worry that maybe that
means no one is considering a backport to bookworm, but I think it
warrants a backport.
Can you advise?
<div dir="auto">How would that work for a pbuilder base image of bookworm? Would I need a hook script to set up the unstable repo and install the package?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Aug 10, 2023, 9:03 PM
Vladimir Petko <<a href="mailto:
vladimir.petko@canonical.com">
vladimir.petko@canonical.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
As far as I know, the bug was fixed in [1] which is safe to update to.<br> Updating to 20230710 is also safe as the July security release version<br> contains ca-certificates-java trigger in the postinstall script.<br>
Best Regards,<br>
Vladimir.<br>
[1] <a href="
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1436785/accepted-ca-certificates-java-20230620-source-into-unstable/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1436785/accepted-ca-certificates-java-20230620-source-into-
unstable/</a><br>
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 3:30 PM Dan Mick <<a href="mailto:
dmick@redhat.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">
dmick@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi guys; sorry for the out-of-band email.<br>
><br>
> <a href="
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030129" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030129</a><br>
><br>
> is affecting a number of projects on bookworm, ceph among them; I see<br> > that it's been tagged 'bookworm-ignore' and I worry that maybe that<br>
> means no one is considering a backport to bookworm, but I think it<br> > warrants a backport.<br>
><br>
> Can you advise?<br>
><br>
</blockquote></div>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)