Hi Sven,
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 05:35:18PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
Obviously the manpages-dev package should not have shipped these files
as long as there are in glibc-doc; this is tracked in #1068166.
I CCed back in 2023-10 the debian-glibc@ list notifying that these pages
were absorbed into the Linux man-pages project. They didn't respond.
Adding a Breaks on glibc-doc (<= 2.38-6) to manpages-dev is no good,
because that version is only in experimental and will remain there for
several weeks if not months. I think manpages-dev should drop these
Why not add glibc-doc 2.38-7 dropping the patch that adds these pages?
We're not in a freeze, so I guess that's fair game.
files for now and re-include either when glibc 2.38 is in unstable or
when it is in testing.
Why do we need to wait to ask for a glibc-doc_2.38-7 with the patch
dropped? Does 2.38 have any freeze at the moment?
There is also the problem that some derivatives (most notably Ubuntu)
are already shipping glibc 2.39 and will have to adjust Breaks/Replaces
versions in manpages-dev accordingly.
Hmmm. I suggest they patch glibc-doc to remove those manual pages.
They have been unsupported for a long time. The last change in
glibc-doc is from 2013.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 09:37:16 |
Calls: | 10,387 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,060 |
Messages: | 6,416,673 |