1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.DEVEL.MENTOR

  • Bug#991118: RFS: openarc/1.0.0~beta3+dfsg-1~exp1

    From Daniel Baumann@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 25 12:30:01 2021
    Hi David

    On 7/25/21 11:04 AM, David Bürgin wrote:
    For all of your items I will comment ‘I did it just like in opendkim and opendmarc’, but let’s go through them.

    :)

    According to the documentation, this is a valid way of specifying the licence.

    re formatting: you're right. however, I think the specification is
    generally interpreted in the way that when you have multiple file
    blocks, you'd use (multiple) distinct license blocks. you're certainly
    not the only one doing it "the other way", but it's the first I've seen
    it that way in all the years.

    for m4: unrelated to the formatting, (just to reiterate as it seems to
    have gone unnotices), you do not have to list it in the first place
    (thus decluttering d/copyright a bit).

    anyhow - up to you, I'd sponsor the package regardless which way you
    choose :)

    * did you consider using 'wrap-and-sort -bast'?

    I hadn’t heard of this before. It doesn’t really seem important to me to be honest, but I can apply it if that’s preferred.

    it's not important, but super nice when you use git (keeps diffs
    smaller/faster to read).

    I will update the package and reupload soon.

    great, let me know and I'm happy to sponsor it.

    Regards,
    Daniel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)