• Re: Bug#1109777: RFS: python-renardo/0.9.12-1 [ITP] -- python-based lan

    From Tiago Bortoletto Vaz@21:1/5 to Joenio Marques da Costa on Tue Jul 29 19:10:01 2025
    XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist

    HI joenio,

    On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 06:07:08PM +0200, Joenio Marques da Costa wrote:
    Hello,

    Le 28/07/2025 à 14:12, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz a écrit :
    I've uploaded the python3-renardo-lib to mentors, then
    you can get it from there.

    - https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-renardo-lib/

    Thanks for your help,

    Sure, I added a comment in mentors.d.o regarding my building attempt.

    I've fixed the package and pushed it to Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-renardo-lib

    Could you try again from Salsa repo, or should I re-upload it
    to mentors?

    Uploaded! Also python-renardo.
    Please check my comment about the .egg-info :-)

    Bests,

    --
    Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
    https://tvaz.cc

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOAYLMZqeqHbTW+jfgVxjVIQAXyEFAmiI/s8ACgkQgVxjVIQA XyHQdw//Tz6tYlXgGfdHIr2f6/yGlF/eicN9fiLh4dWy7dUACJgnxk03hCHE2jw2 3LGem3QUgG3D4QKqxaL06hc6UCmRqg5cKhdTNP/dIApGNWB411uh7a1I1lzUcEIm jxic9bjb3ueyNsghq6nIfa0fQDIci9m3ZfqCWO9hnEPFsSMvXuxRx2UVK8FkO4xC 7wkpXE6/SgCN+r2FvBUlz/ASyrTYfOMQ5p9Fb7CYfUyFliyRoJGzplm9b8MPkTUj tNM+nktoB3Ztti+xh4wRE+M1lIK+9cj1hxtuBJW9SJnQK2kO/1t4PHJlXxbi2G2J kRcQyyIQiUjRxy9+LaGyKYz7LCy3/XDyw1+o5HMd/sHux/m6F0AHoFd8CHGo9rlw JeNUtJxWFXRp2UKOcjT7H+sIVQ+4/jAu5DiwdraincN25IgbfThlhEbWWWSg7jNN 61kLk2wbzhJUWRfOjNCvE1YEPrnbabjMEE6Wt5kvyFVWeegs+iZyV/F8ZdDlmdZz /gs4t4JTccyRkE44sx9ow993CgteOv8PQHdpxgrUAZmYpaeqb25mCW5KqlCYGQlj vleDoPmnBzVRFWypPDgfAFk2tPcvItJCpxBOVE2R0Nc59o6h4P+cOj5YlWcymBB3 NYmQkWw6/aC+FHcCDYTBhKI9yfGvlYQEiMZC8rxcxw3X0Sg0UhQ=
    =oMNW
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tiago Bortoletto Vaz@21:1/5 to Phil Wyett on Thu Jul 31 22:10:01 2025
    Hi,

    On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 08:02:39AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
    All,

    This is in the NEW queue, closing.

    Please do not close ITP bugs as they'll be automatically closed once
    the packaged is accepted by ftp-master. They're in NEW but can still be rejected.

    Bests,

    --
    Tiago Bortoletto Vaz

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOAYLMZqeqHbTW+jfgVxjVIQAXyEFAmiLzCYACgkQgVxjVIQA XyFmcw//abdkLDXGmRIAaYLPDfWM6+aMcREh5/ObylAvdQZm6BMy5VqJi6r8jShf MifME0SDJ4UzC8Vq+IgoP8ajSUNWH9PbqDgTivOjg/EZYiO65RFbmRHwYOVPywaY aCBdzfDsdG8pWdCiQ8a3YzvuvHmuGzTg9vz/r+RNVtHG150oN/eqXP5dmFv+GH+T iGlKCZiXNRK0ZRVRwmmrqxBevE5mN6/qftFkvwcsPkLmw/IGku+JRi59vGl2zwBp CqtM2kDhPUuIpU/sZw1UHcTtGnkxer0SShldiDg08wUDQ+kKuuj8YezD1MM4J2/L BYavUL3p8Rw6epsjyjp/ZjT4nWRFKG0by9ubTgFQxb9R1n1imGfzgE6/ttluFgL9 D88u+fwrgUxA4Z/8bJzx87uQFnSRezrqGAZMxpMwF6QkAQBnnPc21ODcuJ1k8Ci6 j+fIJg8H4LIuHSoI/ICsXj3mXQxHLCf+GumgvkQTe3U2d5Na33gLXPIFNl8OPp16 LQCaMdto3IAMZ6Nuh06xeOXkgNbM7+2AKS1kK0Tn0r6q6IR8+POp8fzRX5cUgy+/ AqYSHgi6H0tBPNmO6upbUJDH+kQYEJX6tuLSKahDHGa6mJlS2n2zCdwB0yTbmQRd AyjjY0XLi++pRQOIoKM/kk0FE1l7m76M69vfsAe1p0WsveKBuVE=
    =mOM/
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Soren Stoutner@21:1/5 to Vaz on Thu Jul 31 16:10:25 2025
    Copy: tiago@debian.org (Tiago Bortoletto Vaz)

    On Thursday, July 31, 2025 1:03:51 PM Mountain Standard Time Tiago Bortoletto
    Vaz wrote:
    Hi,

    On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 08:02:39AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
    All,

    This is in the NEW queue, closing.

    Please do not close ITP bugs as they'll be automatically closed once
    the packaged is accepted by ftp-master. They're in NEW but can still be rejected.

    As far as I can tell, Phil closed the RFS bug, not the ITP bug. Closing the RFS bug is the correct behavior when a package enters NEW. You are correct that any ITP bug should remain open and will automatically be closed when a package clears NEW.

    --
    Soren Stoutner
    soren@debian.org
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmiL9+EACgkQwufLJ66w tgNmIw//USzY2AIiyZsrnHcSFqBd7fH5ffIvdRnicWP20gXQo/1jozb65piry0I6 vaAY04iVAGmOO+rwd2cTUfGmLCAWi5fEohRAgcMZMWrzWFauD6yY95gSYxCEZf5E qssW0t6/b3LpEOKxitW+T3VIZRWzL0bGN2K7MYqQUrYv9ApH/WMh5FC1YNZRQF9t ioPNdFQxz07/TusUVmLjK2ruCbmzGQnrYeR1beFRdRWM6aEgQQGdCZzQY6oh/DpF 7hy7Ura7TG1pwU5s/fYfLmDyBRsQ9+P01vWyBR4hXL94yXJVgKpeBZzi7MG3cfM7 bBw1CjfeukgD+NxxMagq586tU0g0DV0E92Gqs9jT5V1PmC9OP+iydXasgkWFC/aX crnps6rX7WJU5x2NBgicplb9CbQncVuO2Teaon1IP3+8+MhtxtYFuIwLoZxTJ/12 BXPsBaXoWD5HFRfwnAG3MhIUydK7A3aHigS8MA5+m/zkGKjWeYSrTo5xfLU1wXFM NDnNRmQ+k91BIiDu6ZUDCUPHG4p0PuLQjyCzHaIwSZhCZAzCdbv4jE91g7r/olY3 7G98/hhe2X+7LKpFVVx1uCmM3oEpY2UZZiIYycP5nPS+yTExbcOsZlkbsJp/HYcs JyofDLVbdKz5LRhsaCImwGqfTzANdVVqI+JoHZO04mhhNHJuc7E=
    =cW1P
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tiago Bortoletto Vaz@21:1/5 to Soren Stoutner on Fri Aug 1 01:20:01 2025
    On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 04:10:25PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
    On Thursday, July 31, 2025 1:03:51 PM Mountain Standard Time Tiago Bortoletto
    Vaz wrote:
    Hi,

    On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 08:02:39AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
    All,

    This is in the NEW queue, closing.

    Please do not close ITP bugs as they'll be automatically closed once
    the packaged is accepted by ftp-master. They're in NEW but can still be rejected.

    As far as I can tell, Phil closed the RFS bug, not the ITP bug. Closing the RFS bug is the correct behavior when a package enters NEW. You are correct that any ITP bug should remain open and will automatically be closed when a package clears NEW.

    All good then, thanks for pointing out!

    --
    Tiago Bortoletto Vaz

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOAYLMZqeqHbTW+jfgVxjVIQAXyEFAmiL+LsACgkQgVxjVIQA XyHtfxAAnLUSLvh35mSWCs96bh+g6WCfgJlFtOOeDsI4hRFWG76LDzRi/jvuZkNs ygstUbqU9hSc/cSL/26B1/mhzWPhHPtab67686WjRsIGzgdewE4xd9ezX2dHgYVF NqxuCE2KOkpGpb6ylXI2VimfbmuV9c9DLO4AjNbuPyNU7nKmBXF1wKAdiMqGVD0D kCFKqrTMTOIOVBTiOYJI0ofDwHhZAqbsI+Qg5DHozCddOgPlMdy/ThRA2x9vg52/ 2Njpb5MNIRaTJNMj8EYjAiTc0utPYkmdPjP3p+OBgx51vfQRjzw5DwBMBKBnyuPb XfOo7hNAFtAv4Pp2JTYC3gozTudTkf1IApWeFvXy/Susx+UtpQUL4kZdrVMWvIBO xNwZ17eW0pdh13Qq7iMc+elz8vJYiRKOSddZJmkUfsCgRFl7FMmPWj31GEaSELpl 4BdCOzd2MhA2F7A9BgHOz3L56qAVBSjfJZ5iI6d7f1tWSwonWnaOLBTLkREUCxSQ /lfBsPcwukvhg4JlecySrMU2JPGnSi9DrOcDr+unKgRrPWcayXAYWCbWTPVqWMyC ZHMY3a/AYVzVDJmuJs/zeZ/CravsNTzrcpjd/q/gae4xv31Q+OI28Z03t4moemQ/ lL0Dwz8ppBcb3UqyqgIHT/S4g/vNyBmvy2CLSaNLTisMRXLORcs=
    =HNK2
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Soren Stoutner@21:1/5 to Tiago Bortoletto Vaz on Thu Jul 31 16:35:32 2025
    Copy: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org

    On Thursday, July 31, 2025 4:14:04 PM Mountain Standard Time Tiago Bortoletto
    Vaz wrote:
    On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 04:10:25PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
    On Thursday, July 31, 2025 1:03:51 PM Mountain Standard Time Tiago Bortoletto

    Vaz wrote:
    Hi,

    On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 08:02:39AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
    All,

    This is in the NEW queue, closing.

    Please do not close ITP bugs as they'll be automatically closed once
    the packaged is accepted by ftp-master. They're in NEW but can still be rejected.

    As far as I can tell, Phil closed the RFS bug, not the ITP bug. Closing
    the
    RFS bug is the correct behavior when a package enters NEW. You are
    correct
    that any ITP bug should remain open and will automatically be closed when
    a
    package clears NEW.

    All good then, thanks for pointing out!

    The name of the bug is non-standard and includes both RFS and [ITP], so it is easy to get confused about which bug it actually is.

    --
    Soren Stoutner
    soren@debian.org
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmiL/cQACgkQwufLJ66w tgNMRA//ZxeLjgqGWZGDG2R+x4dONsjDJ42t76EXaWnTQNO/i+N+VNPwWj9J6Du0 /OvmBaeOki+smyoWd0gxypLWDzoTdaBr3hWiuzGsbYAFPPrRpn8re//GgSEwGcMI OO3Lsy1BSLTT9KEtqfEDptQ5xpdcjKw6xFLK0g4LCq0r/mBw2o4qV8YqEhHCwskw wmF43mwpsb2oTxWIkF8mvEEkUPw9PT7hf5QnkyE50aOVJMecTM7uKczN5AnNg86x NBIV0IKa9fkCDxl/TS6nlBhyZvuFuxOBUudZiX9Sv5VF28cmYrB4PisJWQMnwbHe cC1HRVIwHsAL8UfmnyH3Q5beAkxbo149ZJYDIX4YD3bQV4bglS6VGaeSWwgZSOKp KRMJOfGSAVFA+TObakDDMZjBIHGYH+TU+YHa39C6qHJWorgwVN+L7+cOy7F1diY4 bwIZps88uH42r5n51kJgpBI/jcWSyxEYxc8lZuudyw7gTzj4X/OeQzGKXsfgtN1t 3et0tIqem/IuW+A3+rdCq+6/HnQR03mPlPdxORJLYqf/Wbik1wTPk5ORiZv8cxxA f3dPpL9OB1kOJUxQ1VqKYFt20yp3TvaWrfj45HRbBO7O+sc3U1VuU2lfB7fb3lqG nOsMruqMVxeEw8EZ4z/XV+k6k1eHm+v1iiO7UNI//8SJZ+pb0rw=
    =aDO2
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Soren Stoutner@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 31 21:44:06 2025
    On Thursday, July 31, 2025 9:02:58 PM Mountain Standard Time Phil Wyett wrote:
    I am dropping a recipient, but hope they see this email. I am not allowed direct contact with Debian Application Managers and until stated otherwise I am sticking to the letter of things to avoid being kicked out of Debian. I
    am
    sure you understand why I am being so cautious.

    I’m sorry to hear that.

    Not really non-standard[1] going by the page linked. Also not sure how 'reportbug' generates an RFS as I have never used it to do one. It can get confusing and will admit it, a double take to look again at subject lines is a common occurrence here. :-)

    [1] https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto/

    You’re right. I stand corrected.

    I hope things go well for you.

    --
    Soren Stoutner
    soren@debian.org
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmiMRhYACgkQwufLJ66w tgPFgQ/5ASIXRRnSj01PrRvD+oEY+NiyR3z9nUhPxLe12s4pb2Rn69onC5cscIEz 8w8FxBqyxcbk91fzkWQwWTjDv2pyK55dJ1fQXN6x9B9MPZG9Ju14qPyOx+aH3i7C LcTQ4mgVQ/Mbbsp7JCwp/7xBlfb/uktAX+CIPq4hHhrCXiSEcIQ+ujM20ZtjSDM4 V/Z84XSNnSg87E2iynfhKnSA2e3TzHWLZ1tKbFQGLIjI8E3VfoQ4bOcu8RkDWVt/ WSWMveBSVjk6kZeXulzwfOLC1Q1rLrAU/YcAbsQWStFWsYlgohe3d+dyVTLnsefF sQtoEgRoM768E2m0cEtS8PMLyy+A03Oe0wqC7YeeOht3KAeFmhlZYhgAQODbxKpo GQxkSURS4sIQDjkW5WkYHJlczAKzxAQCdd0IQ0KSQbktmzrHgk92sZFtlgJDmZvL mIAlygwfSyr4M+iKXJpfDjhAJeAEOAZLerKh7TCiJvBPxV/gQMxEvOAfn8Zx4xnA ITp++qmfYeB2gXzMNZSNmYHzf1D7HDjN7TR8/nbDVrwGKqTyiNvF2S/8HMDYnqzJ YZFULjLdtxhv8TfbUmQ/QWI5dmIZxL5VgQ7DiF6MDpQOMq8SS1iZTyNwn1foa61t oUQw5lEhH6W3vd5JDTBP8G6DIrC1pc2Bb/R+17FItwCwTKDaF0Q=
    =kqgm
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Wyett@21:1/5 to Soren Stoutner on Fri Aug 1 06:30:01 2025
    On Thu, 2025-07-31 at 16:35 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
    On Thursday, July 31, 2025 4:14:04 PM Mountain Standard Time Tiago Bortoletto
    Vaz wrote:
    On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 04:10:25PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
    On Thursday, July 31, 2025 1:03:51 PM Mountain Standard Time Tiago Bortoletto

    Vaz wrote:
    Hi,

    On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 08:02:39AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
    All,

    This is in the NEW queue, closing.

    Please do not close ITP bugs as they'll be automatically closed once the packaged is accepted by ftp-master. They're in NEW but can still be rejected.

    As far as I can tell, Phil closed the RFS bug, not the ITP bug.  Closing
    the
    RFS bug is the correct behavior when a package enters NEW.  You are
    correct
    that any ITP bug should remain open and will automatically be closed when
    a
    package clears NEW.

    All good then, thanks for pointing out!

    The name of the bug is non-standard and includes both RFS and [ITP], so it is
    easy to get confused about which bug it actually is.


    Morning Soren,

    I am dropping a recipient, but hope they see this email. I am not allowed direct
    contact with Debian Application Managers and until stated otherwise I am sticking to the letter of things to avoid being kicked out of Debian. I am sure you understand why I am being so cautious.

    On to business and fun stuff...

    Not really non-standard[1] going by the page linked. Also not sure how 'reportbug' generates an RFS as I have never used it to do one. It can get confusing and will admit it, a double take to look again at subject lines is a common occurrence here. :-)

    As you know, closing the RFS on upload has always been the norm and yes we leave
    all ITP bugs for auto closing when they are accepted into Debian. I hope all is clarified now and we can move on.

    [1] https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto/

    --

    Blog: https://blog.kathenas.org

    GPG Fingerprint: 70A0 AC45 AC77 9EFE 84F6 3AED 724A A9B5 2F02 4C8B

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQJOBAABCAA4FiEEcKCsRax3nv6E9jrtckqptS8CTIsFAmiMPGkaHHBoaWxpcC53 eWV0dEBrYXRoZW5hcy5vcmcACgkQckqptS8CTIvZkBAAjds/Dd+L8vQnrS748Wlt E+SrFTbFc4/isHAeaI+CpFdEU9mqN3cZK8tZr6wd2Pm5Ge63ZqEuMlUNDgSy7gwD aBH04VgfH68d1aJQRCrByUX2nXFU3qd7tSG/P60UP6PlDLmPLxPBEhpTf92Buexk Ggh4ZIgsq7Vb0+QiT5fl+5x9bBYpUPk0DQUJAtWESZK6QBEuXXYDSdrdrSS1EzOI ZRadkUEn0nFP3WOuEQEHZDx/DziT51d+65mYD4GW/rfkRqfsC04xwLd7NtfkX0pr U0Vm2yqPGS6fgxcy9+C/O52e7qt3a4Ks2CQ1mNcL/w0hK/UPS5+egWQDCECuNNGj juUDPf1ZP/tX91eaCD4cmOizJ7eltszVgVqCzNkYzeoRok4+0o2dPW62APLgp9ZP A0YvXF+JNEs6G9P+U1drl3jAOyzpSeWPCt6LctFmWlMjdRIIAm55Xd+OmByyI8Xf J0Ywf7G7honi93VGeUhtbt4ZUyNrB5+DmIwUgyKmVXSl3emrun6naiVCEYSOlCuF E8U1IRi8PRrAMvewamKc6sfx8mzLeQ7dDQ8JHX2RynFoLHtaSMOeJDIkfRPRUo60 W5BThWAYj/0UUIdHZwKfVm5F3e2/4OLsvNPU19evG54qyuiwIFvS2udkRrY39tEe 1x7/VgfEQR/5dCGk8YzKGVI=
    =INzc
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.0
  • From Phil Wyett@21:1/5 to Soren Stoutner on Fri Aug 1 07:20:01 2025
    On Thu, 2025-07-31 at 21:44 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
    On Thursday, July 31, 2025 9:02:58 PM Mountain Standard Time Phil Wyett wrote:
    I am dropping a recipient, but hope they see this email. I am not allowed direct contact with Debian Application Managers and until stated otherwise I
    am sticking to the letter of things to avoid being kicked out of Debian. I
    am
    sure you understand why I am being so cautious.

    I’m sorry to hear that.
     
    Not really non-standard[1] going by the page linked. Also not sure how 'reportbug' generates an RFS as I have never used it to do one. It can get confusing and will admit it, a double take to look again at subject lines is
    a common occurrence here. :-)

    [1] https://mentors.debian.net/sponsors/rfs-howto/

    You’re right.  I stand corrected.

    I hope things go well for you.


    Morning Soren,

    I am not exactly correct. I had to check the fine Mentors site. My habit is to just see which acronym is furthest left in the subject line. :-)

    Regards

    Phil

    --

    Blog: https://blog.kathenas.org

    GPG Fingerprint: 70A0 AC45 AC77 9EFE 84F6 3AED 724A A9B5 2F02 4C8B

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQJOBAABCAA4FiEEcKCsRax3nv6E9jrtckqptS8CTIsFAmiMTJwaHHBoaWxpcC53 eWV0dEBrYXRoZW5hcy5vcmcACgkQckqptS8CTItryQ//Whg35vHBPehgWfi9PU/N qoVH1Tne5aFEmb1Lvbjy0KfRTTPOc6jWwzWQRulEOn8yH9yjSG06q0S86Rpvxfp0 6tjrAy53klzvHKVhFZVHXofYSfrA4N7H5ix9zxOYxSVwvR4W1y90dimzFx/Bc8yb VlwLEUhlvbiBBPYklCFQ8+oBR9iTEYVj+6Y/2oobVE6zVIZzypV69LKRZYytbBm7 50fLUimdpfTeM6vldEvHG+Ggfabgly4P3p6zZQlGkB/jwQLzaKXaFrFo512fv4qg W24N+J5sYM2IYseXvl0IJ2yI1afOLvpIsEHyzlZi4GTMnTLNIYE79DVQzXsLucrw sF1B6v12VdQprNCAQrROgpHaIWH3GSZer2HqZaUEMAgOvQoGEKPyhP5XEcj1LZYB C3nO5VltibmemruBSPc5k0NiBVUvSPuLoJnch8x0xc8jND4RE1k6MjVqlSk+Utyb s3To3KLD0JxzNfJ3O085QDTwXNe+/xBhg4UfdVuXaMCUYxKBo2eBtgKXs58T1xW+ fms8wysl63yt+ZJx8g6UvOsEPOrwVWZRdbMyXA+VbmL02tqb0ScMrGVUOmgYdKa5 7d1OvUBlyGyXtzAKOvOawCZSm27apQgldegWTFPQa1dgpKGi0n4soEc4L71rvBpx /I6jtIp1JIQAsqsg/P2kT24=
    =WZZ0
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.0