• Bug#1010068: RFS: base16384/2.2.0 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to print

    From fumiama@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 23 17:10:01 2022
    Package: sponsorship-requests
    Severity: wishlist

    Dear mentors,

    I am looking for a sponsor for my package "base16384":

    * Package name : base16384
    Version : 2.2.0
    Upstream Author : fumiama <fumiama@foxmail.com>
    * URL : https://github.com/fumiama/base16384
    * License : GPL-3.0+
    * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/base16384
    Section : utils

    The source builds the following binary packages:

    base16384 - Encode binary files to printable utf16be.

    To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

    - https://github.com/fumiama/base16384
    - https://mentors.debian.net/package/base16384/

    Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:

    dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/base16384/base16384_2.2.0.dsc

    I have also published the package to launchpad. If you are using Ubuntu,
    you can install the package by the commands below:

    sudo add-apt-repository ppa:fumiama/ppa
    sudo apt-get update
    sudo apt-get install base16384

    Changes for the initial release:

    base16384 (2.2.0) stable; urgency=medium
    .
    * Initial Release.
    * Closes: #1010055 (ITP).

    Regards,
    --
    fumiama

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 26 20:20:01 2022
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:08:38 +0200
    with message-id <46a2b99d-25e4-168d-f276-c2fb606ed401@debian.org>
    and subject line Re: RFS: base16384/2.2.0 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be.
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1010068,
    regarding RFS: base16384/2.2.0 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be.
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1010068: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010068
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2022 15:07:15 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2018-09-13) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
    HAS_PACKAGE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPOOFED_FREEMAIL,
    SPOOFED_FREEMAIL_NO_RDNS,TXREP,XMAILER_REPORTBUG,X_DEBBUGS_CC
    autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 28; hammy, 145; neutral, 36; spammy,
    5. spammytokens:0.959-+--visit, 0.946-+--H*r:bugs.debian.org,
    0.926-8--D*foxmail.com, 0.867-+--H*MI:localdomain,
    0.860-+--H*M:localdomain hammytokens:0.000-+--dget,
    0.000-+--H*M:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*MI:reportbug,
    0.000-+--H*x:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*UA:reportbug
    Return-path: <fumiama@foxmail.com>
    Received: from [2409:8