• Posting style to reduce flames (Was: Proposal - Remove requirement that

    From Jonas Smedegaard@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 21 09:50:01 2025
    Hi Sam,

    I wasn't going to spawn a thread here in d-vote, but since your wise reflections seems to have inspired at least one Debian Leader now, I
    will do it anyway...

    Quoting Sam Hartman (2025-03-18 23:04:23)
    I find MUA features that allow quoted blocks to be collapsed helpful for
    this reason. (I find notmuch's default Emacs integration gives great
    results for reading interleaved quoting with a screen reader for
    example.)

    However, I have come to the conclusion that for most discussions, top
    quoting is far superior. The interleaved style encourages people to
    respond point-by-point and to lose sight of the overall conversation
    and how/weather their response fits into that.

    I find your point, that interleaved quoting risks derailing the
    conversation, enlightening. Thanks for that.

    I beg to disagree on your conclusion, however, that top-posting is the
    better choice.

    I don't distinguish between interleaved quoting and top-posting, but
    about posting-above-full-quote and posting-below-needed-quote. What I
    mean by that is that it makes sense to me to always post below quoted
    text, but also to actively reflect on what the post really responds to
    and quote only the parts essential to that response.

    Taking your point into account, my advice is therefore not to top-post
    when responding to a post more broadly (as opposed to nitty gritty
    details that risk feeding flames), but to *not* quote at all.

    Kind regards,

    - Jonas

    --
    * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
    * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
    * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones

    [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private --==============750497165506121923=MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Content-Description: signature
    Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"; charset="us-ascii"

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    wsG7BAABCgBvBYJn3SgECRAsfDFGwaABIUcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9u cy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmdxTlqL/DLxM422FbucHd3XGMI5z9VIyDq3qNnnG9lh phYhBJ/j6cNmkaaf9TzGhCx8MUbBoAEhAADOew/+Jp6jvRfUKByelwHe2fK6uy5B /MH7PzMxiAUgzHmAv5S3y3WMQVv9StmBP6AeXfetjXrmo71c8qCTV4HW97L5vNSu r4jpcbJ6XYU8ViSLsaXpwGblbrdD6FDd/oUTyrcokdLRb5HmY0Kt3g5aGTHDaEC9 8PJWDIPxagZX4Jjs4BsbHH5iBlejZ/7439QtOiXoi6SNpdkoEx8S2YHcj3rv+bQz 4SbAry3Vz4y3osdxqAyVAC+h7DGdixkZc2ucXE4GX6NJESetDrZlKCfvRZiYlx69 m7SRNn1+qSg6dHqeWbLrsJjPACZ5P89QeC9FzlftYVR2NhL8FvsQwT7DY41gJb7M d02kCxAjWiYQJ2+VNZyypkQdTF4+FZRLa/vUzqcK
  • From Sean Whitton@21:1/5 to Jonas Smedegaard on Sun Mar 30 11:40:01 2025
    Hello,

    On Fri 21 Mar 2025 at 09:49am +01, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

    I find your point, that interleaved quoting risks derailing the
    conversation, enlightening. Thanks for that.

    Likewise.

    Taking your point into account, my advice is therefore not to top-post
    when responding to a post more broadly (as opposed to nitty gritty
    details that risk feeding flames), but to *not* quote at all.

    Yes, this is the way.

    --
    Sean Whitton

    --=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmfpD+UZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQCWaD/9QuhiQfFPaaUIFoYejxGez vY2ldTl6EL+sujJrlbH9A9cpEjxP4xOBc3dgSezIp659MkIL3wvF8pXXf+V9YwbZ 5fvuRgTN2Hw4dspN7xmhzWhnVeilZTB4lM2djFYqLUcSuyyq6eR7DMVG1GQxh/vH LHkpm17CW4VSSNW8kC2ma0ecFLd8WuLXQvgb5cA354t3BSz33ZT2dVS4WUPsxpoP dnoXvBHqnxk0Oana/sKiCSWYZQnem4PmMrvNWI4fa5cuuCjX4okJ1oXX+od20JuR CO7GMcihfPWUQVMq6H5K1l9zSai3AsMTwtmm4Sx4WBbDNnjN7b0acHlCnIzJLWI1 Ch6iQ0YVrjAiZxZiBTcZ/Vgzx+94nFM8AdZCYYNkj5BDaycHkM2EGQTLa4SBgx5b E0rlhC7DuVOIbYKDaFj+2Ci/oeeJ2ziqi5Tx4Z9qY9+uxy0VjKtns8PdNrXXoX2D 9Nz5crUBX0BE5Qq1pv41lzcQYSRTDVmOED3MLZxcgveM6CTeH/N8wrKZdDkYlptg 1UKfyH+V26ZW3GMhje2JQR/BsWrKS0ihOpgUCZR9M5NO+2EHvpQ1TYbrNw6i53kA 0YIYHPvZ6Qg9eZzFk24FMQoR5anN/RNMO/TOdjjXSV9Ndd5H2v5fFsXbfFFK/f8S wLig6mwU4sfQPrX5qX0xQw==nn30
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Us